FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026493100> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026493100 endingPage "264.e7" @default.
• W2026493100 startingPage "257" @default.
• W2026493100 abstract "Objective To compare the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3 approaches to managing elevated blood pressure (BP) in adolescents in the United States: no intervention, “screen-and-treat,” and population-wide strategies to lower the entire BP distribution. Study design We used a simulation model to combine several data sources to project the lifetime costs and cardiovascular outcomes for a cohort of 15-year-old U.S. adolescents under different BP approaches and conducted cost-effectiveness analysis. We obtained BP distributions from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004 and used childhood-to-adult longitudinal correlation analyses to simulate the tracking of BP. We then used the coronary heart disease policy model to estimate lifetime coronary heart disease events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Results Among screen-and-treat strategies, finding and treating the adolescents at highest risk (eg, left ventricular hypertrophy) was most cost-effective ($18000/QALY [boys] and $47000/QALY [girls]). However, all screen-and-treat strategies were dominated by population-wide strategies such as salt reduction (cost-saving [boys] and $650/QALY [girls]) and increasing physical education ($11000/QALY [boys] and $35000/QALY [girls]). Conclusions Routine adolescents BP screening is moderately effective, but population-based BP interventions with broader reach could potentially be less costly and more effective for early cardiovascular disease prevention and should be implemented in parallel. To compare the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3 approaches to managing elevated blood pressure (BP) in adolescents in the United States: no intervention, “screen-and-treat,” and population-wide strategies to lower the entire BP distribution. We used a simulation model to combine several data sources to project the lifetime costs and cardiovascular outcomes for a cohort of 15-year-old U.S. adolescents under different BP approaches and conducted cost-effectiveness analysis. We obtained BP distributions from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004 and used childhood-to-adult longitudinal correlation analyses to simulate the tracking of BP. We then used the coronary heart disease policy model to estimate lifetime coronary heart disease events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Among screen-and-treat strategies, finding and treating the adolescents at highest risk (eg, left ventricular hypertrophy) was most cost-effective ($18000/QALY [boys] and $47000/QALY [girls]). However, all screen-and-treat strategies were dominated by population-wide strategies such as salt reduction (cost-saving [boys] and $650/QALY [girls]) and increasing physical education ($11000/QALY [boys] and $35000/QALY [girls]). Routine adolescents BP screening is moderately effective, but population-based BP interventions with broader reach could potentially be less costly and more effective for early cardiovascular disease prevention and should be implemented in parallel." @default.
• W2026493100 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5012286167 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5020815537 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5022037416 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5024182885 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5077513309 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5084857746 @default.
• W2026493100 creator A5086681800 @default.
• W2026493100 date "2011-02-01" @default.
• W2026493100 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2026493100 title "Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Blood Pressure Screening in Adolescents in the United States" @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1515801835 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W180141685 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1967241751 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1985614519 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1993480627 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1997686650 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W1998609175 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2000182266 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2008227566 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2013248460 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2020137017 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2027399810 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2028683954 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2034294525 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2043951092 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2044673406 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2050025296 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2070492041 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2085522500 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2086437366 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2098044998 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2107899584 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2119768278 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2120050520 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2125439931 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2125730125 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2130105937 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2137253991 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2138424257 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2138955883 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2139480984 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2140232165 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2145045425 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2145987399 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2148897749 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2155598961 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2156121263 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2159405284 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2160547085 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2164238491 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2170714183 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2288605373 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2314707437 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W2462223300 @default.
• W2026493100 cites W252825069 @default.
• W2026493100 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.058" @default.
• W2026493100 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4007283" @default.
• W2026493100 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20850759" @default.
• W2026493100 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2026493100 type Work @default.
• W2026493100 sameAs 2026493100 @default.
• W2026493100 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002012 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002013 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002014 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002015 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002016 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002017 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002018 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002020 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002021 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002022 @default.
• W2026493100 countsByYear W20264931002023 @default.
• W2026493100 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5012286167 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5020815537 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5022037416 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5024182885 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5077513309 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5084857746 @default.
• W2026493100 hasAuthorship W2026493100A5086681800 @default.
• W2026493100 hasBestOaLocation W20264931002 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C2779874844 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2026493100 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.

• next