Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026694497> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W2026694497 endingPage "25" @default.
- W2026694497 startingPage "19" @default.
- W2026694497 abstract "Abstract As the interest in and the use of object-oriented (OO) development continues to grow, the question of adoption is raised by organizations. Should OO technology be integrated with existing, structured techniques (i.e., evolution)? Or, should current methods be replaced completely by OO technology (i.e., revolution)? At this point in time, there are no agreed upon answers to these questions. In the literature, some contend evolution is best; others contend revolution is best. This article examines this issue by identifying, discussing, and comparing the arguments made by each side of the “evolution versus revolution” argument. Overall, neither side presents an overwhelmingly convincing argument. Several contradictions exist in the arguments, and many unresolved issues remain." @default.
- W2026694497 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2026694497 creator A5051610108 @default.
- W2026694497 date "1997-04-01" @default.
- W2026694497 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2026694497 title "Adopting object-oriented technology: Evolution or revolution?" @default.
- W2026694497 cites W1482832235 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W1976752411 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W1984560806 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W1998460870 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2018845709 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2030289771 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2048055472 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2048888755 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2073916058 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2083096892 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2085460002 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2091823842 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2120788827 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2145459199 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2165518763 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2183506890 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2184282700 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W2912076533 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W3160479391 @default.
- W2026694497 cites W4242644698 @default.
- W2026694497 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0164-1212(96)00046-5" @default.
- W2026694497 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
- W2026694497 type Work @default.
- W2026694497 sameAs 2026694497 @default.
- W2026694497 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2026694497 countsByYear W20266944972014 @default.
- W2026694497 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2026694497 hasAuthorship W2026694497A5051610108 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConceptScore W2026694497C127413603 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConceptScore W2026694497C201995342 @default.
- W2026694497 hasConceptScore W2026694497C41008148 @default.
- W2026694497 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2026694497 hasLocation W20266944971 @default.
- W2026694497 hasOpenAccess W2026694497 @default.
- W2026694497 hasPrimaryLocation W20266944971 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2347751889 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2365875681 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2369610788 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2370734038 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2386867665 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2389979976 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2472693093 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2509653321 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2026694497 hasRelatedWork W843032451 @default.
- W2026694497 hasVolume "37" @default.
- W2026694497 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2026694497 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2026694497 magId "2026694497" @default.
- W2026694497 workType "article" @default.