FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026896502> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026896502 endingPage "1274" @default.
• W2026896502 startingPage "1270" @default.
• W2026896502 abstract "Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. HoLEP is a transurethral procedure that uses the holmium laser fiber (wavelength 2,140 nm) to dissect whole prostatic lobes off of the surgical capsule in retrograde fashion, while maintaining excellent hemostasis. The lobes are removed from the bladder by a purpose built transurethral morcellator, which means that large volume prostates can be enucleated endoscopically. We compared this procedure with transurethral prostate resection (TURP) in a randomized trial by evaluating outcomes in patients with a prostate volume of 40 to 200 ml on transrectal ultrasound.A total of 61 patients with urodynamically proved bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to TURP or HoLEP. Perioperative parameters recorded included resectoscope, laser, electrocautery, morcellation and catheter time, hospital stay, bladder irrigation, volume blood transfusion the rate and resected tissue weight. Patients were followed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively with peak urinary flow rate measurement and quality of life and American Urological Association symptom scores. Patients also underwent urodynamic assessment at 6 months with measurement of peak detrusor pressure at maximal flow, post-void residual volume and prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. Continence, potency and all adverse events were recorded at each visit.HoLEP was superior to TURP in terms of mean catheter time (17.7 +/- 0.7 vs 44.9 +/- 10 hours) and hospital stay (27.6 +/- 2.7 vs 49.9 +/- 5.6 hours) but it required more time to perform (62.1 +/- 5.9 vs 33.1 +/- 3.7 minutes). More prostate tissue was removed in the HoLEP group (40.4 +/- 5.7 vs 24.7 +/- 3.4 gm). HoLEP was also superior to TURP in terms of relieving urodynamic obstruction at 6 months of followup (postoperative detrusor pressure at maximum flow 20.8 +/- 2.8 vs 40.7 +/- 2.7 cm H2O). HoLEP and TURP led to significant improvements in peak flow rates, symptom scores and quality of life scores compared with baseline and there was no significant difference between the 2 procedures with respect to these parameters at 12 months. Fewer adverse events were recorded in the HoLEP group.HoLEP is superior to TURP for relieving bladder outlet obstruction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. It allows more rapid catheter removal and hospital discharge. It requires more time to perform than TURP but more prostate tissue is removed, resulting in similar efficiency in tissue retrieval. HoLEP is equivalent to TURP in relieving men of lower urinary tract symptoms and in improving peak urinary flow rates at 12 months of followup." @default.
• W2026896502 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5001703973 @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5036766039 @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5042732152 @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5045625231 @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5046182137 @default.
• W2026896502 creator A5055523862 @default.
• W2026896502 date "2003-10-01" @default.
• W2026896502 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2026896502 title "A Randomized Trial Comparing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Glands (40 to 200 Grams)" @default.
• W2026896502 cites W1972503461 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W1991660046 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W1999185547 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2013006722 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2027849704 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2041802832 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2044155827 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2044679603 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2076181751 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2089692149 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2091646128 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2110984181 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2126644512 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2141022095 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W2148922824 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W3015768894 @default.
• W2026896502 cites W4297626827 @default.
• W2026896502 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000086948.55973.00" @default.
• W2026896502 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14501739" @default.
• W2026896502 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2026896502 type Work @default.
• W2026896502 sameAs 2026896502 @default.
• W2026896502 citedByCount "285" @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022012 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022013 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022014 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022015 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022016 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022017 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022018 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022019 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022020 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022021 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022022 @default.
• W2026896502 countsByYear W20268965022023 @default.
• W2026896502 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5001703973 @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5036766039 @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5042732152 @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5045625231 @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5046182137 @default.
• W2026896502 hasAuthorship W2026896502A5055523862 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C188261085 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2776547966 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2777562237 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2777957205 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2779478474 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2780070792 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2780768273 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C2910468371 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C121608353 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C126322002 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C126894567 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C141071460 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C188261085 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2776235491 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2776547966 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2777562237 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2777957205 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2779466945 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2779478474 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2780070792 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2780768273 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C2910468371 @default.
• W2026896502 hasConceptScore W2026896502C71924100 @default.
• W2026896502 hasIssue "4 Part 1" @default.
• W2026896502 hasLocation W20268965021 @default.
• W2026896502 hasLocation W20268965022 @default.
• W2026896502 hasOpenAccess W2026896502 @default.
• W2026896502 hasPrimaryLocation W20268965021 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2086053156 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2270907260 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2361226225 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2371954747 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2414475439 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W3009448823 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W4310532409 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W4311230875 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W4382462402 @default.
• W2026896502 hasRelatedWork W2110280633 @default.

• next