FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026959629> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026959629 endingPage "207" @default.
• W2026959629 startingPage "200" @default.
• W2026959629 abstract "In 1898, E.A. Fay published an analysis of nearly 5000 marriages among deaf individuals in America collected during the 19th century. Each pedigree included three-generation data on marriage partners that included at least one deaf proband, who were ascertained by complete selection. We recently proposed that the intense phenotypic assortative mating among the deaf might have greatly accelerated the normally slow response to relaxed genetic selection against deafness that began in many Western countries with the introduction of sign language and the establishment of residential schools. Simulation studies suggest that this mechanism might have doubled the frequency of the commonest forms of recessive deafness (DFNB1) in this country during the past 200 years. To test this prediction, we collected pedigree data on 311 contemporary marriages among deaf individuals that were comparable to those collected by Fay. Segregation analysis of the resulting data revealed that the estimated proportion of noncomplementary matings that can produce only deaf children has increased by a factor of more than five in the past 100 years. Additional analysis within our sample of contemporary pedigrees showed that there was a statistically significant linear increase in the prevalence of pathologic GJB2 mutations when the data on 441 probands were partitioned into three 20-year birth cohorts (1920 through 1980). These data are consistent with the increase in the frequency of DFNB1 predicted by our previous simulation studies and provide convincing evidence for the important influence that assortative mating can have on the frequency of common genes for deafness. In 1898, E.A. Fay published an analysis of nearly 5000 marriages among deaf individuals in America collected during the 19th century. Each pedigree included three-generation data on marriage partners that included at least one deaf proband, who were ascertained by complete selection. We recently proposed that the intense phenotypic assortative mating among the deaf might have greatly accelerated the normally slow response to relaxed genetic selection against deafness that began in many Western countries with the introduction of sign language and the establishment of residential schools. Simulation studies suggest that this mechanism might have doubled the frequency of the commonest forms of recessive deafness (DFNB1) in this country during the past 200 years. To test this prediction, we collected pedigree data on 311 contemporary marriages among deaf individuals that were comparable to those collected by Fay. Segregation analysis of the resulting data revealed that the estimated proportion of noncomplementary matings that can produce only deaf children has increased by a factor of more than five in the past 100 years. Additional analysis within our sample of contemporary pedigrees showed that there was a statistically significant linear increase in the prevalence of pathologic GJB2 mutations when the data on 441 probands were partitioned into three 20-year birth cohorts (1920 through 1980). These data are consistent with the increase in the frequency of DFNB1 predicted by our previous simulation studies and provide convincing evidence for the important influence that assortative mating can have on the frequency of common genes for deafness." @default.
• W2026959629 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5010370816 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5020359971 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5023061786 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5030684064 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5072319446 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5075112348 @default.
• W2026959629 creator A5076258777 @default.
• W2026959629 date "2008-08-01" @default.
• W2026959629 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2026959629 title "A Comparative Analysis of the Genetic Epidemiology of Deafness in the United States in Two Sets of Pedigrees Collected More than a Century Apart" @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1558494600 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1596627530 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1935916792 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1963768450 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1981750477 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1986953863 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W1999410318 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2008110609 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2009581629 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2019304102 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2020693400 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2031501920 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2043730073 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2044923411 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2083725317 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2092890929 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2093693512 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2095046262 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2112708647 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2114236462 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2114929889 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2115643821 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2119744081 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2131514063 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2158585306 @default.
• W2026959629 cites W2167603638 @default.
• W2026959629 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.07.001" @default.
• W2026959629 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2495057" @default.
• W2026959629 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18656178" @default.
• W2026959629 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2026959629 type Work @default.
• W2026959629 sameAs 2026959629 @default.
• W2026959629 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292012 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292013 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292014 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292015 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292016 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292017 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292018 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292019 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292020 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292021 @default.
• W2026959629 countsByYear W20269596292022 @default.
• W2026959629 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5010370816 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5020359971 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5023061786 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5030684064 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5072319446 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5075112348 @default.
• W2026959629 hasAuthorship W2026959629A5076258777 @default.
• W2026959629 hasBestOaLocation W20269596291 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C107130276 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C188997412 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C22593422 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C2777433574 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C501734568 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C514575182 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C104317684 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C107130276 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C126322002 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C144024400 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C149923435 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C188997412 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C22593422 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C2777433574 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C2780493683 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C501734568 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C514575182 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C54355233 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C548259974 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C71924100 @default.
• W2026959629 hasConceptScore W2026959629C86803240 @default.
• W2026959629 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2026959629 hasLocation W20269596291 @default.
• W2026959629 hasLocation W20269596292 @default.

• next