FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2027068461> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2027068461 endingPage "2080" @default.
• W2027068461 startingPage "2063" @default.
• W2027068461 abstract "While compressed sensing (CS)-based algorithms have been developed for the low-dose cone beam CT (CBCT) reconstruction, a clear understanding of the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose at low-dose levels is needed. In this paper, we qualitatively investigate this subject in a comprehensive manner with extensive experimental and simulation studies. The basic idea is to plot both the image quality and imaging dose together as functions of the number of projections and mAs per projection over the whole clinically relevant range. On this basis, a clear understanding of the tradeoff between the image quality and imaging dose can be achieved and optimal low-dose CBCT scan protocols can be developed to maximize the dose reduction while minimizing the image quality loss for various imaging tasks in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Main findings of this work include (1) under the CS-based reconstruction framework, image quality has little degradation over a large range of dose variation. Image quality degradation becomes evident when the imaging dose (approximated with the x-ray tube load) is decreased below 100 total mAs. An imaging dose lower than 40 total mAs leads to a dramatic image degradation, and thus should be used cautiously. Optimal low-dose CBCT scan protocols likely fall in the dose range of 40–100 total mAs, depending on the specific IGRT applications. (2) Among different scan protocols at a constant low-dose level, the super sparse-view reconstruction with the projection number less than 50 is the most challenging case, even with strong regularization. Better image quality can be acquired with low mAs protocols. (3) The optimal scan protocol is the combination of a medium number of projections and a medium level of mAs/view. This is more evident when the dose is around 72.8 total mAs or below and when the ROI is a low-contrast or high-resolution object. Based on our results, the optimal number of projections is around 90 to 120. (4) The clinically acceptable lowest imaging dose level is task dependent. In our study, 72.8 mAs is a safe dose level for visualizing low-contrast objects, while 12.2 total mAs is sufficient for detecting high-contrast objects of diameter greater than 3 mm." @default.
• W2027068461 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2027068461 creator A5018120191 @default.
• W2027068461 creator A5026332974 @default.
• W2027068461 creator A5058225724 @default.
• W2027068461 creator A5066232843 @default.
• W2027068461 date "2012-03-30" @default.
• W2027068461 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2027068461 title "A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT" @default.
• W2027068461 cites W1972150100 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W1973581605 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W1983275710 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W1988679857 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W1993323376 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2011315295 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2024575266 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2034974381 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2042653706 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2042776093 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2045059592 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2048841289 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2052547439 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2053790843 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2068640565 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2071099763 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2082419455 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2090769594 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2091229147 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2095024285 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2096309518 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2107733279 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2112095335 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2119259145 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2129638195 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2141983208 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2142743510 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2145096794 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2149400409 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W2157812230 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W3106045672 @default.
• W2027068461 cites W4250955649 @default.
• W2027068461 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/2063" @default.
• W2027068461 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3352686" @default.
• W2027068461 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22459913" @default.
• W2027068461 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2027068461 type Work @default.
• W2027068461 sameAs 2027068461 @default.
• W2027068461 citedByCount "74" @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612012 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612013 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612014 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612015 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612016 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612017 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612018 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612019 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612020 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612021 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612022 @default.
• W2027068461 countsByYear W20270684612023 @default.
• W2027068461 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2027068461 hasAuthorship W2027068461A5018120191 @default.
• W2027068461 hasAuthorship W2027068461A5026332974 @default.
• W2027068461 hasAuthorship W2027068461A5058225724 @default.
• W2027068461 hasAuthorship W2027068461A5066232843 @default.
• W2027068461 hasBestOaLocation W20270684612 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C141379421 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C149857219 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C2987700449 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C3018399558 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConcept C9267231 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C11413529 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C115961682 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C126838900 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C141379421 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C149857219 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C154945302 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C159985019 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C192562407 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C19527891 @default.
• W2027068461 hasConceptScore W2027068461C204323151 @default.

• next