Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2027332422> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2027332422 endingPage "285" @default.
- W2027332422 startingPage "273" @default.
- W2027332422 abstract "Accounting literature is replete with quantitative models that use financial ratios to identify the probability of a going concern qualification. These studies, however, ignore qualitative cues that auditors use to identify going concern problems and mitigating factors (sound financial plans etc.) that auditors take into account in their choice of report. Tests whether, in the presence of financial distress, non‐financial cues play an important role in auditors’ choice. Results indicate that non‐financial variables can be used to discriminate between the auditor’s decision to issue the going concern qualified versus the clean report. Helps company management understand how auditors evaluate their clients and the importance of the qualitative criteria used in their evaluation. Can be used to predict the most probable outcome prior to the external audit. Second, facilitates understanding of the non‐financial red flags that could trigger the going concern report. Third, can be used to analyze potential acquisition targets, and, if the acquisition target is still otherwise desirable, be used in pricing negotiations. Fourth, can be applied to aspects of the firm’s own division’s operations in order to enable the internal audit department to better allocate its own investigational and problem‐solving resources. Finally, the fact that qualitative factors have power in predicting the going concern modified report suggests that company decision makers can evaluate others even if the auditor for political or other reasons has chosen not to render a modified report." @default.
- W2027332422 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2027332422 creator A5067357233 @default.
- W2027332422 creator A5067665714 @default.
- W2027332422 date "1999-08-01" @default.
- W2027332422 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2027332422 title "The usefulness of off‐balance sheet variables as predictors of auditors’ going concern opinions: an empirical analysis" @default.
- W2027332422 cites W1501579857 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W1559339763 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2006680549 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2020377294 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2021005948 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2023944948 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2047394535 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2083027321 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2253849159 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2320676937 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2323469645 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W2327213212 @default.
- W2027332422 cites W3121569405 @default.
- W2027332422 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909910280190" @default.
- W2027332422 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W2027332422 type Work @default.
- W2027332422 sameAs 2027332422 @default.
- W2027332422 citedByCount "43" @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222012 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222013 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222014 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222015 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222016 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222017 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222018 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222020 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222021 @default.
- W2027332422 countsByYear W20273324222022 @default.
- W2027332422 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2027332422 hasAuthorship W2027332422A5067357233 @default.
- W2027332422 hasAuthorship W2027332422A5067665714 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C170856484 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C183206440 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C2777823127 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConcept C41282006 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C10138342 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C121955636 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C144133560 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C162118730 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C170856484 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C17744445 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C182306322 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C183206440 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C199521495 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C199539241 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C199776023 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C2777823127 @default.
- W2027332422 hasConceptScore W2027332422C41282006 @default.
- W2027332422 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2027332422 hasLocation W20273324221 @default.
- W2027332422 hasOpenAccess W2027332422 @default.
- W2027332422 hasPrimaryLocation W20273324221 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2068785946 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2174494939 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2178935300 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2392050030 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2562095567 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W2985194302 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W306070083 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W3182926319 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W3205653508 @default.
- W2027332422 hasRelatedWork W4221079057 @default.
- W2027332422 hasVolume "14" @default.
- W2027332422 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2027332422 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2027332422 magId "2027332422" @default.
- W2027332422 workType "article" @default.