FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2027395342> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2027395342 endingPage "130" @default.
• W2027395342 startingPage "122" @default.
• W2027395342 abstract "Compared with conventional microsurgical technique, the full endoscopic (FE) interlaminar approach is a more minimally invasive technique for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniations. Its efficacy and safety have been confirmed by numerous studies. However, a steep learning curve with the use of such a complex technique is a major concern for the initial adoption of this technique.To evaluate the learning curve of using an FE interlaminar technique for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation.A prospective study of patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent discectomy via interlaminar approach assisted by FE instruments.Thirty patients with lumbar disc herniation underwent discectomy using an interlaminar endoscopic-only approach between 2008 and 2009.The patients were divided into three groups of 10 sequential cases each. Group A consisted of the first 10 cases, Group B the subsequent 10 cases, and Group C the last 10 cases. The clinical evaluation data included operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) leg and back pain scores, complications, and rate of conversion to an open.All patients were observed prospectively for 1.61 ± 0.22 years (range, 1.2-2.0 years). There was no measurable intraoperative bleeding and postoperative infections in the three groups. Compared with Group A, the operative time in Group B was significantly decreased (p < .001). The patients in Group C had much less operative time than in Group B (p = .002). There was no significant difference with length of hospital stay in the three groups (p = .897). The improvement of VAS leg and back pain scores in each group was similar: there was a significant improvement (p < .01) at 3 months after surgery when compared with preoperative scores, but there was no statistical difference (p > .05) in the VAS leg and back pain scores between 3 months after surgery and final follow-up. The complication rate was 12.5% for Group A, 10% for Group B, and 0% for Group C. The need for conversion to an open procedure for Group A was 20% compared with zero cases in both Groups B and C. There were no symptomatic recurrences in our study.Excellent clinical and minimally invasive outcomes can be obtained in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation via the interlaminar approach assisted by FE technique. However, attention must be paid to the steep learning curve by using this complex technique. Imprecise anatomic orientation and manipulation inside the spinal canal are key factors in the steep learning curve. Obtaining microsurgical experience, attending workshops, and suitable patient selection can help shorten the learning curve and decrease the complications." @default.
• W2027395342 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2027395342 creator A5006784886 @default.
• W2027395342 creator A5044554353 @default.
• W2027395342 creator A5063396957 @default.
• W2027395342 creator A5076547827 @default.
• W2027395342 creator A5080323037 @default.
• W2027395342 date "2011-02-01" @default.
• W2027395342 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2027395342 title "An evaluation of the learning curve for a complex surgical technique: the full endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar disc herniations" @default.
• W2027395342 cites W1526011022 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W1964070904 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W1973956163 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W1984536493 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W1999902557 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2015499689 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2019213684 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2032397127 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2033921976 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2041689528 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2057010008 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2058132607 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2060663061 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2075236750 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2079307991 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2079523615 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2081360302 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2082752047 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2110152581 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2127870064 @default.
• W2027395342 cites W2143100083 @default.
• W2027395342 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.12.006" @default.
• W2027395342 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21296295" @default.
• W2027395342 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2027395342 type Work @default.
• W2027395342 sameAs 2027395342 @default.
• W2027395342 citedByCount "137" @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422012 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422013 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422014 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422015 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422016 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422017 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422018 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422019 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422020 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422021 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422022 @default.
• W2027395342 countsByYear W20273953422023 @default.
• W2027395342 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2027395342 hasAuthorship W2027395342A5006784886 @default.
• W2027395342 hasAuthorship W2027395342A5044554353 @default.
• W2027395342 hasAuthorship W2027395342A5063396957 @default.
• W2027395342 hasAuthorship W2027395342A5076547827 @default.
• W2027395342 hasAuthorship W2027395342A5080323037 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C2992636618 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C3019496433 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C141071460 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C14184104 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C188816634 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C2776008035 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C2992636618 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C3019496433 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C44575665 @default.
• W2027395342 hasConceptScore W2027395342C71924100 @default.
• W2027395342 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2027395342 hasLocation W20273953421 @default.
• W2027395342 hasLocation W20273953422 @default.
• W2027395342 hasOpenAccess W2027395342 @default.
• W2027395342 hasPrimaryLocation W20273953421 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W1995310763 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2050435684 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2081090297 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2103583599 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2277700242 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2348716264 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2393592617 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2897628182 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2920722503 @default.
• W2027395342 hasRelatedWork W2264365359 @default.
• W2027395342 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2027395342 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2027395342 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2027395342 magId "2027395342" @default.
• W2027395342 workType "article" @default.