FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2027462110> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2027462110 endingPage "88" @default.
• W2027462110 startingPage "83" @default.
• W2027462110 abstract "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the first-line surgical treatment of calculous gall-bladder disease and the benefits over open cholecystectomy are well known. In the early years of LC, the higher rate of bile duct injuries compared with open cholecystectomy was believed to be due to the 'learning curve' and would dissipate with increased experience. The purpose of the present paper was to review a tertiary referral unit's experience of bile duct injuries induced by LC.A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients referred for management of an iatrogenic bile duct injury from 1981 to 2000. For injuries sustained at LC, details of time between LC and recognition of the injury, time from injury to definitive repair, type of injury, use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), definitive repair and postoperative outcome were recorded. The type of injury sustained at open cholecystectomy was similarly classified to allow the severity of injury to be compared.There were 131 patients referred for management of an iatrogenic bile duct injury that occurred at open cholecystectomy (n = 62), liver resection (n = 5) and at LC (n = 64). Only 39% of bile duct injuries were recognized at the time of LC. Following conversion to open operation, half the subsequent procedures were considered inappropriate. When the injury was not recognized during LC, 70% of patients developed bile leak/peritonitis, almost half of whom were referred, whereas the rest underwent a variety of operative procedures by the referring surgeon. The remainder developed jaundice or abnormal liver function tests and cholangitis. An IOC was performed in 43% of cases, but failed to identify an injury in two-thirds of patients. The bile duct injuries that occurred at LC were of greater severity than with open cholecystectomy. Following definitive repair, there was one death (1.6%). Ninety-two per cent of patients had an uncomplicated recovery and there was one late stricture requiring surgical revision.The early prediction that the rate of injury during LC would decline substantially with increased experience has not been fulfilled. Bile duct injury that occurs at LC is of greater severity than with open cholecystectomy. Bile duct injury is recognized during LC in less than half the cases. Evidence is accruing that the use of cholangiography reduces the risk and severity of injury and, when correctly interpreted, increases the chance of recognition of bile duct injury during the procedure. Prevention is the key but, should an injury occur, referral to a specialist in biliary reconstructive surgery is indicated." @default.
• W2027462110 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2027462110 creator A5015276717 @default.
• W2027462110 creator A5017483194 @default.
• W2027462110 creator A5031834231 @default.
• W2027462110 creator A5084102651 @default.
• W2027462110 date "2002-02-01" @default.
• W2027462110 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2027462110 title "Iatrogenic bile duct injury: The scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy" @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1965650461 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1976959612 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1979652541 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1981169974 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1984483062 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1988853720 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1995840911 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W1996907756 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2006851859 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2007938207 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2022997030 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2033631604 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2039455178 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2040264409 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2042358776 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2056187632 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2070873752 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2089608335 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2091490182 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2108847783 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2127706197 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2137522761 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2160499314 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2320131867 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2328676592 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2472592426 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W2636795279 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W3204429343 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W41027254 @default.
• W2027462110 cites W86218247 @default.
• W2027462110 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02315.x" @default.
• W2027462110 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12074081" @default.
• W2027462110 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2027462110 type Work @default.
• W2027462110 sameAs 2027462110 @default.
• W2027462110 citedByCount "98" @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102012 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102013 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102014 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102015 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102016 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102017 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102018 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102019 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102020 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102021 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102022 @default.
• W2027462110 countsByYear W20274621102023 @default.
• W2027462110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2027462110 hasAuthorship W2027462110A5015276717 @default.
• W2027462110 hasAuthorship W2027462110A5017483194 @default.
• W2027462110 hasAuthorship W2027462110A5031834231 @default.
• W2027462110 hasAuthorship W2027462110A5084102651 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2776637226 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2776884468 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2777148285 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2777683338 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2778456037 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C2779777945 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C3020409179 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C126322002 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C141071460 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2776637226 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2776641081 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2776884468 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2777148285 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2777683338 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2778456037 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C2779777945 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C3020409179 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C61434518 @default.
• W2027462110 hasConceptScore W2027462110C71924100 @default.
• W2027462110 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2027462110 hasLocation W20274621101 @default.
• W2027462110 hasLocation W20274621102 @default.
• W2027462110 hasOpenAccess W2027462110 @default.
• W2027462110 hasPrimaryLocation W20274621101 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2084307133 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2201536874 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2235282045 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2356268818 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2371120165 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2372837262 @default.
• W2027462110 hasRelatedWork W2530542116 @default.

• next