FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2027804576> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2027804576 endingPage "194" @default.
• W2027804576 startingPage "188" @default.
• W2027804576 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A retrospective review. Objective. To compare the radiographical and clinical profiles between 2 surgical approaches for the correction of sagittal plane spinal deformity. Summary of Background Data. Sagittal plane decompensation is the radiographical parameter that carries the greatest impact on adverse outcomes. Surgical correction methods are heterogeneous, and opposing views pervade the spine community in consideration of the most effective approach and techniques to achieve correction. Methods. A total of 33 cases with sagittal spinal deformity were assessed according to their surgical approach, posterior only versus combined anteroposterior group. Comparison was based on the demographic data, and radiographical parameters included pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis. Results. Twenty two subjects were identified for the posterior-only and 11 subjects for the anteroposterior group. Average age was 58.7 years in the posterior-only and 55.7 years for the combined approach. Preoperative mean sagittal vertical axis was 186.6 and 147.7 mm, for the posterior-only and combined approaches, respectively (P = 0.1). Preoperative mean pelvic tilt was 34.2° for the posterior-only and 36.9° for the combined approach group (P = 0.5). A greater operative time for the combined approach was significant, 535 versus 333 minutes for the posterior-only approach (P < 0.001). In the posterior-only group, 8 of 22 patients and 7 of 11 patients in the combined-approach cohort experienced a postoperative complication (P = 0.16). The average follow-up was 41.8 and 47.7 months for the posterior-only and combined approaches, respectively (P = 0.4). Conclusion. A posterior-only or combined surgical approach had comparable radiographical outcomes. Higher morbidity was significant in regard to operative time in the combined-approach group. Deciding on the approach best suited for achieving correction in the sagittal plane likely resides on the surgeon's experience and expertise. Opposing views pervade the spine community on the most effective surgical approach for sagittal plane correction. A comparison between 33 cases treated for sagittal spinal deformity according to their surgical approach was performed. Radiographical parameters analyzed were not significant between groups; increased operative time was significant for the combined group." @default.
• W2027804576 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5000807957 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5001051149 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5031098760 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5049740332 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5051085985 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5057360267 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5058809446 @default.
• W2027804576 creator A5059990999 @default.
• W2027804576 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2027804576 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2027804576 title "Comparative Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Osteotomies for the Correction of Sagittal Plane Spinal Deformity in Adults" @default.
• W2027804576 cites W1977734596 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2007072550 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2013023534 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2020863706 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2025093540 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2025922068 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2027788451 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2040497219 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2049001898 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2059871323 @default.
• W2027804576 cites W2113533695 @default.
• W2027804576 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318266b816" @default.
• W2027804576 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22772573" @default.
• W2027804576 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2027804576 type Work @default.
• W2027804576 sameAs 2027804576 @default.
• W2027804576 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2027804576 countsByYear W20278045762014 @default.
• W2027804576 countsByYear W20278045762015 @default.
• W2027804576 countsByYear W20278045762016 @default.
• W2027804576 countsByYear W20278045762017 @default.
• W2027804576 countsByYear W20278045762018 @default.
• W2027804576 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5000807957 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5001051149 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5031098760 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5049740332 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5051085985 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5057360267 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5058809446 @default.
• W2027804576 hasAuthorship W2027804576A5059990999 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2778721985 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2779418094 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2780329765 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2780901121 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C2992931878 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C126838900 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C141071460 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C164705383 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C167135981 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C178910020 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2778721985 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2779418094 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2779982284 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2780329765 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2780901121 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C29694066 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C2992931878 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C36454342 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C44575665 @default.
• W2027804576 hasConceptScore W2027804576C71924100 @default.
• W2027804576 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2027804576 hasLocation W20278045761 @default.
• W2027804576 hasLocation W20278045762 @default.
• W2027804576 hasOpenAccess W2027804576 @default.
• W2027804576 hasPrimaryLocation W20278045761 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2027804576 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2053735013 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2077923184 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2123075435 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2789998363 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2906658448 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2952968153 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W3117486995 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W4214807965 @default.
• W2027804576 hasRelatedWork W2586247790 @default.
• W2027804576 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2027804576 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2027804576 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2027804576 magId "2027804576" @default.
• W2027804576 workType "article" @default.