FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2028025226> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2028025226 endingPage "11" @default.
• W2028025226 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2028025226 abstract "In 2010, the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies Women's Caucus celebrates its 35th birthday. For thirty-five years, the ASECS Women's Caucus has promoted the study of women, gender, and sexuality by sponsoring panels, opening discussions, and giving out prizes for excellent work in the area. annual luncheon at ASECS has been a place to do business, but also to connect, catch up, and meet new people engaged in the overlapping projects of feminist studies, gender studies, and the study of women's contribution to eighteenth-century life and cultures. To celebrate this anniversary, the current issue of Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation is devoted to The Future of Feminist Theory in Eighteenth-Century Studies, a topic that contributors have taken in a variety of directions. first part of the issue offers shorter, polemical statements about possible directions for the future. Several of the writers respond specifically to the challenge in this issue's call for papers to consider the possibility that feminist theory has a limited future because so many of the barriers have been broken and so much of the work has been done. Joan DeJean assesses the state of feminist work in French studies; Judith P. Zinsser explores feminist issues particular to biography; Melissa Mowry and Alison Conway in different ways think about where theory and historical research need to go in the future; and Ellen Pollak demonstrates the enduring ties between eighteenth-century studies and feminist analysis. second part of this issue points toward possible new directions through scholarly examples. Toni Bowers shows the truly impressive depth of engagement that feminist studies has brought to the novel, and Jennifer Thorn and JoEllen DeLucia explore, through their own practice, emerging interdisciplinary feminist possibilities that reveal the interconnectedness of gender, race, and history. By way of introduction, I want to consider briefly here the future of women writers in eighteenth-century studies. inclusion of women writers (or women artists, philosophers, political agents, or historical actors) into eighteenth-century studies was the foundational issue for feminist studies in our field, and the fact that so few of the essays here focus primarily on this topic suggests how far we have come, although, as DeJean points out, this progress has been uneven across the various disciplines represented at ASECS. In the study of British literature and culture, however, women writers have gone from marginal to indispensable: a Norton or a Longman anthology without sufficient entries by women writers at this point would be more puzzling than offensive, as if the publisher had left out the page numbers. Feminist theory has long addressed a wide range of issues, and its early engagement by eighteenth-century scholars reflects this variety. Certainly, some of the earliest forays into feminist thought in eighteenth-century studies included the critique of male-authored texts as well as the effort to recover women. Yet, arguably, it was the search for women writers, in part with the hope that those women would provide counter-representations to dominant narratives, that turned gender studies into a field and made possible the kind of support and solidarity that one finds in the Women's Caucus, in spite of the highly varied interests of its members. consolidated feminist thought and practice, gave shape to a certain kind of specialization, and established ah enduring foundation for future work. Further, of all the achievements of eighteenth-century feminist theory, the recovery project has probably had the most impact on scholarly and critical practice in the mainstream of eighteenth-century literary studies, with influence on and analogies to other forms of recovery in other disciplines in eighteenth-century studies as a whole. But while recovery has been, and continues to be, indispensable, it has nevertheless framed women writers in ways that sometimes limit our full understanding of their intellectual, historical, and artistic force. …" @default.
• W2028025226 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2028025226 creator A5083626508 @default.
• W2028025226 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2028025226 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2028025226 title "Introduction: Recovering from Recovery" @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1491972703 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1495201879 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1565917411 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1582589400 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1584486187 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W1997068195 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2003620991 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2005007794 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2015587541 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2022760582 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2026145966 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2032328212 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2032427395 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2068716213 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2074416903 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2128158263 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2335412546 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2589016778 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2795528460 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2797857301 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W2947020496 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W3146629021 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W560870674 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W578420620 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W580881067 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W586071961 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W607173926 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W617521870 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W619292300 @default.
• W2028025226 cites W641551747 @default.
• W2028025226 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.0.0026" @default.
• W2028025226 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2028025226 type Work @default.
• W2028025226 sameAs 2028025226 @default.
• W2028025226 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2028025226 countsByYear W20280252262012 @default.
• W2028025226 countsByYear W20280252262018 @default.
• W2028025226 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2028025226 hasAuthorship W2028025226A5083626508 @default.
• W2028025226 hasBestOaLocation W20280252261 @default.
• W2028025226 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2028025226 hasConceptScore W2028025226C95457728 @default.
• W2028025226 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2028025226 hasLocation W20280252261 @default.
• W2028025226 hasOpenAccess W2028025226 @default.
• W2028025226 hasPrimaryLocation W20280252261 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2332941581 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2488258410 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2498735738 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2503791906 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2587147951 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2587265756 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2908402300 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2946980061 @default.
• W2028025226 hasRelatedWork W2947840720 @default.
• W2028025226 hasVolume "50" @default.
• W2028025226 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2028025226 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2028025226 magId "2028025226" @default.
• W2028025226 workType "article" @default.