FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2028742034> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2028742034 endingPage "906" @default.
• W2028742034 startingPage "901" @default.
• W2028742034 abstract "To assess institutional and patient compliance with quality of life (QL) instruments in RTOG clinical trials. To assess feasibility of using the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT), Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ), and Changes in Urinary Function (CUF) QL instruments in a prostate clinical trial and to compare patient self-report of symptoms to medical professional ratings of the same symptoms using the RTOG acute toxicity rating scales.Three self-assessment QL instruments, the FACT, the SAQ, and CUF, were to be administered to patients on a Phase II locally advanced prostate trial at specified time points. Specific instructions for both data managers and for patients on when, how, and why to fill out the questionnaires were included.Sixty-seven percent (24 out of 36) of patients accrued to RTOG 90-20 completed both the initial FACT and SAQ. Eighty-five percent completed FACT at end of RT and 73% at 3 months. Eighty-one percent completed SAQ at end of treatment, while 69% completed this form at 3 months. Compliance drops off thereafter. Seventy-five percent of patients who had their symptom of dysuria rated by a medical professional as 0 on the RTOG toxicity rating scale self-reported the same. Only 56% of patient self-reports on FACT regarding diarrhea were in agreement with the medical professional's RTOG rating of 0 toxicity. The measures were determined to be in moderate agreement when the patient evaluated a symptom as a 1 on the FACT and the medical professional rated the same symptom as a 0 on the RTOG toxicity rating scale. There was moderate agreement in 13% of patients with dysuria and 31% of patients with diarrhea. Low agreement occurred when the patient evaluated a symptom as a 2 or 3 on the FACT and the medical professional rated the same symptom as a 0 on the RTOG scale. Low agreement occurred in 13% of both patients reporting dysuria and diarrhea. Differences between how medical professionals and patients were able to rate erectile function make direct comparisons difficult, but the trend towards significant discrepancies is still noteworthy.Quality of life assessments are necessary and attainable in RTOG clinical trials. Compliance rates for both institutional and patient participation were acceptable at initial and 3 month follow-up. Reasons for noncompliance were predominantly institution related and not patient related. Strategies to address both institution and patient compliance have been developed and implemented within the RTOG. Serious disagreement between patient self-reports of symptoms on the FACT QL scale and medical professional ratings on the RTOG acute toxicity rating scales of the same symptoms was 13% at 3 months follow-up. This warrants continued use of QL self-assessments in clinical trials." @default.
• W2028742034 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5005691073 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5026425735 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5030653008 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5039180386 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5041429646 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5055720969 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5057333651 @default.
• W2028742034 creator A5068710491 @default.
• W2028742034 date "1995-11-01" @default.
• W2028742034 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2028742034 title "RTOG's first quality of life study—RTOG 90-20: A phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole for locally advanced prostate cancer" @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2012934217 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2026086873 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2042389643 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2057233538 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2076590365 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2105258029 @default.
• W2028742034 cites W2282303968 @default.
• W2028742034 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02002-5" @default.
• W2028742034 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7591900" @default.
• W2028742034 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2028742034 type Work @default.
• W2028742034 sameAs 2028742034 @default.
• W2028742034 citedByCount "74" @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342012 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342013 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342014 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342015 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342017 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342018 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342019 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342022 @default.
• W2028742034 countsByYear W20287420342023 @default.
• W2028742034 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5005691073 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5026425735 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5030653008 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5039180386 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5041429646 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5055720969 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5057333651 @default.
• W2028742034 hasAuthorship W2028742034A5068710491 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C2776845205 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C121608353 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C126322002 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C138496976 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C15744967 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C159110408 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C1862650 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C195910791 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C2776845205 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C2779951463 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C2780192828 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C509974204 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C535046627 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C71924100 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C77411442 @default.
• W2028742034 hasConceptScore W2028742034C83849319 @default.
• W2028742034 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2028742034 hasLocation W20287420341 @default.
• W2028742034 hasLocation W20287420342 @default.
• W2028742034 hasOpenAccess W2028742034 @default.
• W2028742034 hasPrimaryLocation W20287420341 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W1778235618 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2007640804 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2057698464 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2088463812 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2122329366 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2384708512 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W2755052350 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W3021633275 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W3171454233 @default.
• W2028742034 hasRelatedWork W3216213721 @default.
• W2028742034 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2028742034 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2028742034 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2028742034 magId "2028742034" @default.
• W2028742034 workType "article" @default.