FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029127061> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029127061 endingPage "4030" @default.
• W2029127061 startingPage "4030" @default.
• W2029127061 abstract "Purpose. To compare the properties of the visual field index (VFI) to those of mean deviation (MD) in patients with glaucoma. Methods. MD and VFI were calculated in data obtained from an ongoing longitudinal study in which patients with glaucoma (N = 109, 204 eyes) were observed for 9.8 years (median, 21 tests) with static automated perimetry. MD and VFI were compared in one test of each eye, and a subset of 30 tests were selected to compare the VFI with the judgments of eight experts who judged the percentage of the remaining visual field. In series of tests obtained over time, rates of change, statistical significance, evidence of nonlinearity, and variability were compared between both indices. Results. In single tests, MD and VFI were closely related (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). The relationship between both indices appeared linear, except in visual fields with MDs better than -5.0 dB where 29 (22%) of 129 eyes exhibited a ceiling effect (VFI = 100%). Based on this relationship, the predicted VFIs for visual fields with MDs of -5, -10, and -15 dB were 91%, 76%, and 60%, respectively. The percentage of remaining visual field suggested by the VFI exceeded the range of the experts' subjective judgments in 16 (53%) of 30 eyes. In series of tests obtained over time, rates of change with the two indices were closely related (r = 0.79, P < 0.001), and statistically significant reductions over time (P < 0.05) occurred in a similar number of eyes (92 [45%] with MD, and 87 [43%] with VFI). Of the 105 eyes with statistically significant (P < 0.05) negative trend in either MD or VFI, 74 (70%) showed such trends with both indices (κ = 0.69). The variability of MD and VFI increased with damage, and there was no evidence that change over time was more linear with VFI than with MD. Conclusions. The VFI provides a simple and understandable metric of visual field damage, but its estimates of remaining visual field were more optimistic than those of the experts. Rates of change over time with both indices were closely related, but the reliance of the VFI on pattern deviation probability maps caused a ceiling effect that may have reduced its sensitivity to change in eyes with early damage. In this group of patients there was no evidence to suggest that the VFI is either superior or inferior to the MD as a summary measure of visual field damage." @default.
• W2029127061 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5016649583 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5025686495 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5067964100 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5072877743 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5079778841 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5087906809 @default.
• W2029127061 creator A5091239867 @default.
• W2029127061 date "2011-06-08" @default.
• W2029127061 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2029127061 title "Properties of the Statpac Visual Field Index" @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1481376442 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1536887873 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1578617841 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1594929052 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1909506533 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1964642961 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1968811682 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1971022950 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1974946105 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1975287798 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1988851655 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1994117740 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1995593084 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1997013844 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2008785553 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2014038230 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2014388846 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2016762800 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2017977165 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2019979290 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2024081693 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2026209674 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2027338229 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2029844813 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2035780999 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2038127365 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2041280725 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2042098225 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2045519105 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2046687383 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2052028042 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2054923311 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2061841032 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2065289190 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2066208434 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2070161732 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2081618857 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2085340359 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2090561303 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2094182090 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2094803132 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2105839946 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2112401023 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2122218905 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2138205399 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2154214707 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2155245960 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2169776019 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W95159135 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W1928479201 @default.
• W2029127061 cites W2064142190 @default.
• W2029127061 doi "https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6905" @default.
• W2029127061 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21467169" @default.
• W2029127061 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2029127061 type Work @default.
• W2029127061 sameAs 2029127061 @default.
• W2029127061 citedByCount "89" @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612012 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612013 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612014 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612015 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612016 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612017 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612018 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612019 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612020 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612021 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612022 @default.
• W2029127061 countsByYear W20291270612023 @default.
• W2029127061 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5016649583 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5025686495 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5067964100 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5072877743 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5079778841 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5087906809 @default.
• W2029127061 hasAuthorship W2029127061A5091239867 @default.
• W2029127061 hasBestOaLocation W20291270611 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C120934525 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C191290158 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2029127061 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.

• next