FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029194493> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029194493 abstract "Abstract Field trials of new methodologies, products or technologies are considered to be an effective way to gauge the true value of such innovations. However it is difficult and expensive to conduct a rigorous field trial, especially in tight, multi-layered reservoirs, and proper design and analyses are critical to accurately interpret the results. In multi-layered reservoirs the production from individual frac stages must often be evaluated with production logs - this additional expense accentuates the need to carefully design the field trial and thoroughly analyze the resulting data to extract as much value as possible. This paper will provide a detailed comparison of well productivity in the Pinedale Anticline as a function of proppant type and subinterval. Well production has been normalized by many parameters, including reservoir kh, kh?P, kh*(Pr2-Pf2), Fh, and also compared by well location to determine the degree to which those techniques provide similar conclusions. In addition to describing how these field results influence proppant selection in the Pinedale Anticline, this paper will describe many aspects of field trial planning, as well as the proper handling of data to assist in the design of future trials. This paper will review the following topics: The results of this study will also be compared to other published field trials to examine well populations, data consistency, and to assess whether studies in similar reservoirs carry similar findings. This paper will summarize the conclusions that are consistent between numerous tight gas field studies in the region, and highlight changes to fracture treatments which have consistently improved well productivity and profitability in these reservoirs. Introduction In many ways, a field trial resembles a legal court trial. Evidence must be carefully examined, and opposing arguments should be considered. Individual pieces of information are seldom 100% convincing; conclusions must be reached from layers of supporting evidence. The jury must decide the verdict based on the confidence in the evidence, and various risk thresholds may be applied ( the preponderance of evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt). One advantage to a field trial is that it can be carefully designed to eliminate or reduce the effect of some variables that could influence the results. This paper will describe the design and analyses of a field trial in the Pinedale Anticline and summarize the supporting evidence the jury may use to select proppant in this field. Background Information During the past five years, the industry has completed over 200 wells in the Pinedale Anticline (PDA), utilizing over 500 million pounds of proppant. However, there is no consensus on the optimal stimulation design, with each operator using different criteria to select proppant. This trial was specifically designed to determine which proppant was most cost-effective in wells completed by Shell Rocky Mountain Production. Design of Field Trial This study compares the production from 446 fracture treatments in 30 new wells completed by Shell between September 2001 and September 2004. During this time, efforts were made to maintain a consistent stimulation design to determine the impact of proppant selection upon stage production and profitability." @default.
• W2029194493 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029194493 creator A5042444616 @default.
• W2029194493 creator A5044871777 @default.
• W2029194493 creator A5045389912 @default.
• W2029194493 date "2007-01-29" @default.
• W2029194493 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2029194493 title "Field Trial Design and Analyses of Production Data From a Tight Gas Reservoir: Detailed Production Comparisons From the Pinedale Anticline" @default.
• W2029194493 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/106151-ms" @default.
• W2029194493 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2029194493 type Work @default.
• W2029194493 sameAs 2029194493 @default.
• W2029194493 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2029194493 countsByYear W20291944932012 @default.
• W2029194493 countsByYear W20291944932013 @default.
• W2029194493 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2029194493 hasAuthorship W2029194493A5042444616 @default.
• W2029194493 hasAuthorship W2029194493A5044871777 @default.
• W2029194493 hasAuthorship W2029194493A5045389912 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C113740612 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C116637073 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C2777447996 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C2778348673 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C2779096232 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C59427239 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C113740612 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C116637073 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C124101348 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C127313418 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C127413603 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C139719470 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C151730666 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C154945302 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C162324750 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C202444582 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C2776436953 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C2777447996 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C2778348673 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C2779096232 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C33923547 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C39432304 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C41008148 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C548081761 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C59427239 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C77928131 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C78762247 @default.
• W2029194493 hasConceptScore W2029194493C9652623 @default.
• W2029194493 hasLocation W20291944931 @default.
• W2029194493 hasOpenAccess W2029194493 @default.
• W2029194493 hasPrimaryLocation W20291944931 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W1998362166 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W2095209471 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W2371612142 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W2378245607 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W2388963214 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W2393199123 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W3184311205 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W4252737224 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W4288873656 @default.
• W2029194493 hasRelatedWork W1965765670 @default.
• W2029194493 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2029194493 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2029194493 magId "2029194493" @default.
• W2029194493 workType "article" @default.