FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029247488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029247488 endingPage "4854" @default.
• W2029247488 startingPage "4851" @default.
• W2029247488 abstract "Triplet-exciton formation through intersystem crossing of photogenerated singlet excitons in fullerene acceptors can compete with charge generation in organic photovoltaic diodes. This article reports the intersystem crossing timescale (τISC) of the most commonly used fullerene acceptors, PC60BM and PC70BM, in solutions and in spin-coated films. These times are on the nanosecond timescale, and are longer than the characteristic times for charge generation (τd). Functionalized fullerene derivatives are frequently used in solution-processed organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs), with power conversion efficiencies now exceeding 10%.1 Although substantial improvements to device efficiencies have been achieved through developing new donor polymers (typically low-bandgap, Eg∼1.6–1.8 eV), [6,6]-phenyl-C61/71-butyric acid methyl esters (PCBM) have remained one of the best electron acceptors since their introduction almost two decades ago.2 In pristine fullerenes very high yields of triplet excitons are formed through efficient intersystem crossing (ISC) of photoexcited singlet excitons driven by the large spin-orbit interactions in the fullerene cage and the small exchange energies (∼0.2 eV).3-6 We report here the ISC times for PCBM, and find that though fast (lower bounds are 0.7 ns for PC70BM and 1.4 ns for PC60BM), these times are longer than the characteristic times for dissociation of photoexcitations in OPVs. This is very important for PV operation, since the generation of triplet excitons on the PCBM domains is expected to have a detrimental effect on device performance. Besides limiting the device lifetime through reacting with oxygen to produce highly reactive radical anion, O2−,7, 8 the PCBM triplets can transfer into low-energy triplets on the donor polymer rather than separating into charge-carriers.9 This is very likely because the PCBM triplet energies (1.5 eV)10 are higher than those of the polymers (typically 0.9–1.2 eV).11 Once formed, the polymer triplets are rapidly quenched to the ground state through triplet-charge annihilation, and thus act as a very substantial loss mechanism.12-14 A schematic of this mechanism and the chemical structures of PCBMs are depicted in Figure 1. The light-absorbing layer of an OPV cell is a finely intermixed thin-film of the donor polymer and fullerene acceptor. The energetic offset at the interface provides the necessary driving force to overcome the strong binding energies (typically ∼ 0.3 eV) of singlet excitons resulting from the low dielectric constants of organic semiconductors (ε ∼ 3).15 These neutral excitations are photogenerated on both the donor polymer and the fullerene domains, and charge generation occurs across the interface. For triplet excitons, the energetic offset required for dissociation is several hundred milli-electronvolts greater than for singlet excitons due to the exchange energy.15 This process is therefore not energetically favourable in OPV systems with high charge-transfer (CT) state energies (as required to maximise open-circuit voltage).16 It is now considered that the superior device performance achieved with fullerene derivatives such as PCBM as the acceptor is due to their ability to grow pure aggregates (about 10 nm) near finely intermixed domains.17-21 The pure fullerene aggregates are considered to generate the necessary delocalised states that can sustain long-range charge separation.22 Here we report the ISC timescale in PCBMs (τISC), and compare them with the timescale at which charges are generated from the dissociation of photogenerated singlet excitons (τd). These are not straightforward to measure because spectral features in transient optical measurements from singlet and triplet states are difficult to observe and to separate. We investigated the exciton dynamics in PC60BM and PC70BM samples using time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy and transient absorption spectroscopy. These samples consisted of dilute solutions (1 mg/ml in various solvents) and thin spin-coated films (∼120 nm thick on quartz substrates). In solution phase, the excitons are localised on a single fullerene and most optical transitions in the visible spectral region are forbidden due to the high structural symmetry.23, 24 Alternatively, the intermolecular interactions in films allow certain optical transitions in the visible including the lowest-energy singlet exciton (S1) state. The ground state absorption and the steady-state PL spectra are shown in Figure 2a. The excited states in these systems are weakly emissive; we measured quantum yields of 0.20% and 0.14% for PC60BM and PC70BM solutions, respectively, and these were below the detection limit for films. For transient absorption spectroscopy, we used home-built non-collinear optical parametric amplifiers to generate broadband probe pulses with an overall spectral range spanning from 520–1600 nm.25 As we show below, this broad spectral range is necessary to distinguish the singlet and triplet absorption features. The samples were photoexcited at between 470–530 nm throughout this work, which corresponds to a spectral region where PCBM actively absorb and contribute to the photocurrent in OPVs.26 Figure 2b shows the time evolution of the PL measured at their peaks. The kinetics were fitted to a mono-exponential decay model with the displayed time constants. The good fits to the model indicate that the PL were resulted from a single excited species, which is most likely the photo-excited singlet excitons based on the short lifetimes. The PL kinetics were not dependent on the probe wavelength, which suggests that the observed PL features corresponded to the same optical transition within the accessible spectral range. We note that a slight reduction to the singlet exciton lifetimes (by ∼100 ps) was observed for solutions with strongly chlorinated solvents (Figure S1). Given that non-radiative decay should not be affected by the choice of solvent, we consider that this is due to faster ISC resulted from the increased spin-orbit interactions. The singlet lifetimes were reduced in films, which is expected because the intermolecular interaction should give rise to non-radiative decay channels. However, the small differences indicate that the dynamics of the singlets are not significantly affected, particularly in PC60BM. We now turn to the transient absorption results for solutions (Figure 3). The negative differential transmission signals observed throughout the spectral range correspond to excited state absorptions. The transient spectra exhibited significant spectral changes as the time delay increased from picoseconds to nanoseconds (panel (a) and (d)). By employing a spectral extraction tool based on a genetic algorithm, we show that a linear combination of two distinct species, shown for both samples in panel (b) and (e), can fully explain the observed dynamics.27 More details about the spectral extraction tool can be found in Supporting Information. The kinetics associated with these extracted spectra are shown in panel (c) and (f), fitted to a mono-exponential decay and growth model based on a shared time constant (see Table 1 for values). The emerging spectrum was long-lived, with lifetimes of 40μs (PC60BM) and 140 μs (PC70BM) (Figure S2). On the basis of these results, we assign the initial excited state (present over picosecond timescales) to photoexcited singlets and the one emerging at later times to triplets. For films, the transient spectra were much broadened compared to those observed for solutions, but exhibited similar spectral changes with time (Figure 4). We employed the same analysis method as for the solution measurements to deconvolute the overlapping spectral features. We show that the overall dynamics also represents a linear combination of two distinct species, which resemble the singlet and triplet absorption spectra and kinetics observed in solutions (see Table 1 for values). This consistency indicates that singlet and triplet excitons are the primary excited states in films. It is clear that the exciton absorption features were broadened as a result of intermolecular interactions in these films. However, the similar kinetic lifetimes suggests that the exciton dynamics were not significantly affected. The time constants extracted from both time-resolved PL and transient absorption measurements correspond to the singlet exciton lifetime, which is given by (kr + knr + kISC)−1, where kr is the radiative decay rate, knr is the non-radiative decay rate, and kISC is the ISC rate. Therefore, the extracted time constants provide a lower bound of the ISC timescales. As evident from the low PL yields, kr is negligible for all samples (>10−6 s−1). Based on the high triplet yields previously observed for other fullerene derivatives in solutions, we consider that the time constants extracted for solutions to be a reasonable estimate of the ISC timescale in these systems. For films, the slight reductions in the time constants were likely resulted from increased non-radiative decay through intermolecular interactions. On the basis of these observations, we estimate an ISC timescale of ∼1.4 ns (PC60BM) and ∼0.7 ns (PC70BM) as the lower-bound values for both solutions and films. We find that these times are comparable to those previously reported for the pristine fullerene molecules. 3, 4 The ISC timescales of PCBM singlet excitons determined here provide important implications for OPVs. As summarised in Figure 1, ISC of photoexcited singlets on the PCBM domains (kISC) is a loss pathway that competes with charge generation (kd). In OPV blends with optimised morphologies, charge generation is typically completed at a much faster timescale.22, 28, 29 It is therefore unlikely that the PCBM singlets generated in these blends have enough time to undergo ISC, and thus this particular loss pathway is avoided. Several recent studies have reported that recombination occurred through the triplet states of the donor polymer when blended with fullerene derivatives such as ICMA and ICBA.13, 30 Although it has been concluded that these polymer triplets were formed via bimolecular recombination of free charges, we note that they could also be formed through ISC of the fullerene singlets if kISC > kd. Further investigation on the ISC timescale of these fullerene derivatives would provide valuable insight on this loss mechanism. As we have noted above, the superior device efficiencies achieved using fullerene derivatives such as PCBM is now attributed to their ability to form both finely intermixed domains and pure aggregates when blended with the polymer. While we believe that this is the primary reason, we consider that the relatively slow ISC rates of PCBMs is also a contributing factor, as it sets an upper bound to the PCBM domain sizes. This should be taken into consideration for the design of future OPV acceptors. Sample Preparation: The solutions were prepared inside a nitrogen glovebox and measured in quartz cuvettes with 1 mm transmitted path length. Films were spin-coated onto Spectrosil quartz substrates that were previously cleaned via successive sonication in acetone and isopropyl alcohol. Spectroscopy: UV-visible absorption spectra were measured with a Hewlett-Packard 8453 UV−vis spectrometer. For PL measurements, the samples were photoexcited using a 470 nm pulsed laser from PicoQuant with pulse width <200 ps at fluence of 5 nJ/cm2. The spectra were measured with a spectrograph (SpectraPro 2500i, Princeton Instruments) coupled with a thermo-electronically cooled CCD camera (PIXIS 100-F, Princeton Instruments). A time-correlated single photon counting setup (Lifespec-ps, Edinburgh Instruments) was used to measure the PL kinetics. An integrating sphere with nitrogen flow was used for measuring the PL quantum yield. The photoexcitation pulses in transient absorption measurements were generated from two different sources. For measurements within 2ns, the excitation pulses were generated using a travelling wave optical parametric amplifier of superflourescence (TOPAS, Light Conversion) seeded with a portion of a Ti:sapphire amplifier system (Spectra-Physics Solstice) operating at 1 kHz. These pulses were delayed using a mechanical delay stage (Newport). Longer time measurements from 1ns onwards were photoexcited using the second harmonic output of a Q-switched Nd:YVO4 laser (ACE; Advanced Optical Technologies Ltd.). These pulses were delayed electronically. To cover a broad spectral range spanning from 520–1600 nm, the probe pulses were generated using home-built non-collinear optical parametric amplifiers (NOPA) each pumped by a portion of the amplifier system. The transient absorption signals measured using probe pulses from these NOPAs (each with 300—500 nm bandwidths) were then merged to provide the broad spectral window. The chirp was carefully corrected such that time zero was consistent between measurements, thereby allowing accurate spectral extraction to be performed on the ensemble. The films were measured under a dynamic vacuum (<1 × 10−5 mbar) during PL and transient absorption measurements. The authors thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability for research funding. S.A-S. thanks the Indo-UK APEX Program for financial support. S.G. acknowledges funding from the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT). As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article." @default.
• W2029247488 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029247488 creator A5037462405 @default.
• W2029247488 creator A5060458159 @default.
• W2029247488 creator A5074696754 @default.
• W2029247488 creator A5090998176 @default.
• W2029247488 date "2014-06-06" @default.
• W2029247488 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2029247488 title "Nanosecond Intersystem Crossing Times in Fullerene Acceptors: Implications for Organic Photovoltaic Diodes" @default.
• W2029247488 cites W182669160 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W1964754116 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W1984625085 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W1990245069 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2005501037 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2014548503 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2016564617 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2018802594 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2024835591 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2037441291 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2055948114 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2058351727 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2071134066 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2087861551 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2092503496 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2102935354 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2103735091 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2114361119 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2130810321 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2134779741 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2167049637 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2313145999 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2314100637 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2320084022 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2326731534 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W2327634605 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W4243463717 @default.
• W2029247488 cites W49106822 @default.
• W2029247488 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400846" @default.
• W2029247488 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4515088" @default.
• W2029247488 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24902831" @default.
• W2029247488 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2029247488 type Work @default.
• W2029247488 sameAs 2029247488 @default.
• W2029247488 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882015 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882016 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882017 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882018 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882019 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882020 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882021 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882022 @default.
• W2029247488 countsByYear W20292474882023 @default.
• W2029247488 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2029247488 hasAuthorship W2029247488A5037462405 @default.
• W2029247488 hasAuthorship W2029247488A5060458159 @default.
• W2029247488 hasAuthorship W2029247488A5074696754 @default.
• W2029247488 hasAuthorship W2029247488A5090998176 @default.
• W2029247488 hasBestOaLocation W20292474881 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C162862793 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C181500209 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C184779094 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C33062035 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C41291067 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C49040817 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C51141536 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C521977710 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C73978554 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C75473681 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C78434282 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConcept C91614233 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C120665830 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C121332964 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C159985019 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C162862793 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C171250308 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C178790620 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C181500209 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C184779094 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C185592680 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C18903297 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C192562407 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C33062035 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C41291067 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C49040817 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C51141536 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C520434653 @default.
• W2029247488 hasConceptScore W2029247488C521977710 @default.

• next