FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029286303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029286303 endingPage "91" @default.
• W2029286303 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2029286303 abstract "Históricamente el ictus se vinculó a concepciones mágico-religiosas. Analizamos la autopercepción del ictus en los pacientes, el conocimiento sobre factores de riesgo vascular (FRV) o desencadenantes, y la eficacia de la comunicación médico-paciente, desde un punto de vista antropológico. Estudio prospectivo de pacientes con ictus, mediante entrevistas en profundidad y observación participante. Excluimos pacientes con una escala de Rankin modificada > 3, afasia o disartria grave. Analizamos la calidad de la información ofrecida por el personal sanitario y su propia valoración, mediante encuestas abiertas. Se entrevistaron 100 pacientes (56 hombres), edad media 61(DE 16). EL 51% tenía un nivel educativo inferior o igual al básico. El 83% no reconocía que ocurría al sufrirlo y sólo el 56% acudió directamente a Urgencias. Un 19% identifica sus FRV y hasta el 57% piensa que lo desencadenó un factor fortuito. El desconocimiento de la enfermedad se asoció con un nivel educativo bajo (OR 2,81;IC 95%:1,14-6,90;p = 0,024). Un 75% no entiende el discurso biomédico, pero un 65% afirma sentirse bien informado. Por otro lado, el 69% del personal sanitario facultativo piensa que los pacientes están bien informados; similar porcentaje considera que el “bajo nivel cultural” dificulta la comunicación. El conocimiento de la enfermedad y sus FRV en los pacientes con ictus es escaso. Suelen percibirlo como algo fortuito asociado a un fuerte impacto emocional. La comunicación médico-paciente es ineficaz, ni profesionales ni pacientes detectan esta realidad. Esta falta de conocimiento de su enfermedad y sus FRV podría influir negativamente en una buena prevención secundaria. Stroke was historically attributed to magical and religious conceptions. We analyse the self-perception of stroke in stroke patients, the knowledge of vascular risk factors (VRF), and doctor-patient communication efficacy from an anthropological perspective. Prospective study of stroke patients by semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Those with modified Rankin Scale > 3, aphasia or severe dysarthria were excluded. The quality of the information from health staff to the patients, as well as the evaluation of this information by the health staff themselves, were analysed. The study included 100 patients (56 men), with a mean age of 61 (SD 16) years. Low educational level was present in 51%. Up to 83% did not know what was happening with the first stroke symptoms, and only 56% went to an emergency department initially. Only 19% could identify all their vascular risk factors (VRF), and up to 57% thought that the cause was due to a fortuitous factor. Poor knowledge of stroke was associated with low educational level (OR: 2.81; 95% CI, 1.14-6.90, P = .024). Up to 75% of the patients did not understand the information provided by their doctor, but 65% felt well informed. Furthermore, up to 69% of physicians thought that patients were well informed; the same percentage felt that low educational level made communication difficult. The knowledge of stroke and its VRF in stroke patients is low. They perceive it as something fortuitous associated to a strong emotional impact. Communication between doctors and stroke patients is relatively poor, although neither physicians nor patients detect this fact. This poor knowledge of stroke and VRF could have a negative influence on secondary prevention compliance." @default.
• W2029286303 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029286303 creator A5010911605 @default.
• W2029286303 creator A5015773721 @default.
• W2029286303 creator A5031771006 @default.
• W2029286303 creator A5086775534 @default.
• W2029286303 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2029286303 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2029286303 title "Estudio sociocultural sobre la autopercepción del ictus y análisis de la comunicación médico-paciente" @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2016187107 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2033112031 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2036768804 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2039962007 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2048993053 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W205495280 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2056808217 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2073196978 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2079052307 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2080641340 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2095361175 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2119372838 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2128297528 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2151715257 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2153878657 @default.
• W2029286303 cites W2332083490 @default.
• W2029286303 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2010.09.017" @default.
• W2029286303 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2029286303 type Work @default.
• W2029286303 sameAs 2029286303 @default.
• W2029286303 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2029286303 countsByYear W20292863032013 @default.
• W2029286303 countsByYear W20292863032015 @default.
• W2029286303 countsByYear W20292863032018 @default.
• W2029286303 countsByYear W20292863032019 @default.
• W2029286303 countsByYear W20292863032023 @default.
• W2029286303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2029286303 hasAuthorship W2029286303A5010911605 @default.
• W2029286303 hasAuthorship W2029286303A5015773721 @default.
• W2029286303 hasAuthorship W2029286303A5031771006 @default.
• W2029286303 hasAuthorship W2029286303A5086775534 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConceptScore W2029286303C138885662 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConceptScore W2029286303C15708023 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConceptScore W2029286303C15744967 @default.
• W2029286303 hasConceptScore W2029286303C71924100 @default.
• W2029286303 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2029286303 hasLocation W20292863031 @default.
• W2029286303 hasLocation W20292863032 @default.
• W2029286303 hasOpenAccess W2029286303 @default.
• W2029286303 hasPrimaryLocation W20292863031 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2609344916 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2780307509 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W4210390885 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W59019880 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2308060692 @default.
• W2029286303 hasRelatedWork W2478882070 @default.
• W2029286303 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2029286303 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2029286303 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2029286303 magId "2029286303" @default.
• W2029286303 workType "article" @default.