Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029378077> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2029378077 endingPage "2302" @default.
- W2029378077 startingPage "2296" @default.
- W2029378077 abstract "Background There is limited knowledge regarding the relationship between the reason for revising a TKA and the clinical outcome in terms of satisfaction, pain, and function with time. Questions/purposes In a cohort of patients receiving a fully revised TKA, we hypothesized (1) outcomes would differ according to reason for revision at 2 years, (2) outcomes would improve gradually during those 2 years, (3) rates of complications differ depending on the reason for revision, and (4) patients with complications have lower scores. Methods We studied a prospective cohort of 150 patients receiving a fully revised TKA using a single implant system in two high-volume centers at 24 months of followup. VAS satisfaction, VAS pain, The Knee Society Scoring System© (KSS) clinical and functional scores, and complication rate were correlated with their reasons for revision, including septic loosening, aseptic loosening, component malposition, instability, and stiffness. Results The aseptic loosening group showed better outcomes compared with the instability, malposition, and septic loosening groups, which showed intermediate results (p < 0.05). The stiffness group performed significantly worse on all outcome measures. The outcome for patients with a complication, after treatment of the complication, was less favorable. Conclusions The reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcomes. Satisfaction, pain reduction, and functional improvement are better and complication rates are lower after revision TKA for aseptic loosening than for other causes of failure. For component malposition, instability, and septic loosening groups, there may be more pain and a higher complication rate. For stiffness, the outcomes are less favorable in all scores. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence." @default.
- W2029378077 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2029378077 creator A5000567118 @default.
- W2029378077 creator A5002932391 @default.
- W2029378077 creator A5002971759 @default.
- W2029378077 creator A5039989718 @default.
- W2029378077 creator A5065392641 @default.
- W2029378077 date "2013-07-01" @default.
- W2029378077 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2029378077 title "Reason for Revision TKA Predicts Clinical Outcome: Prospective Evaluation of 150 Consecutive Patients With 2-years Followup" @default.
- W2029378077 cites W108902866 @default.
- W2029378077 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2940-8" @default.
- W2029378077 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3676611" @default.
- W2029378077 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23543418" @default.
- W2029378077 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2029378077 type Work @default.
- W2029378077 sameAs 2029378077 @default.
- W2029378077 citedByCount "76" @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772014 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772015 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772016 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772017 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772018 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772019 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772020 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772021 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772022 @default.
- W2029378077 countsByYear W20293780772023 @default.
- W2029378077 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2029378077 hasAuthorship W2029378077A5000567118 @default.
- W2029378077 hasAuthorship W2029378077A5002932391 @default.
- W2029378077 hasAuthorship W2029378077A5002971759 @default.
- W2029378077 hasAuthorship W2029378077A5039989718 @default.
- W2029378077 hasAuthorship W2029378077A5065392641 @default.
- W2029378077 hasBestOaLocation W20293780772 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C126322002 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C141071460 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C1862650 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C188816634 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C201903717 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C2775944032 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C71924100 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C72563966 @default.
- W2029378077 hasConceptScore W2029378077C81182388 @default.
- W2029378077 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2029378077 hasLocation W20293780771 @default.
- W2029378077 hasLocation W20293780772 @default.
- W2029378077 hasLocation W20293780773 @default.
- W2029378077 hasLocation W20293780774 @default.
- W2029378077 hasOpenAccess W2029378077 @default.
- W2029378077 hasPrimaryLocation W20293780771 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W2042664817 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W2111865112 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W2750095015 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W2901892643 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W3116131585 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W3176033318 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W4254169278 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W4281965648 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W4313590353 @default.
- W2029378077 hasRelatedWork W4226344455 @default.
- W2029378077 hasVolume "471" @default.
- W2029378077 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2029378077 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2029378077 magId "2029378077" @default.
- W2029378077 workType "article" @default.