FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W20294854> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W20294854 endingPage "40" @default.
• W20294854 startingPage "36" @default.
• W20294854 abstract "Abstract Does collaboration on a test, independent of prior collaborative learning, affect test performance? In almost all the descriptions, demonstrations, and studies of collaboration testing and academic achievement, the effect of collaborative learning on achievement is conflated with the effect of collaborative testing alone. The results of this study show that collaborative testing alone has a significant positive association with test performance that varies by the level of cognitive processing reflected in the test question. Introduction Collaborative learning techniques have been widely used at the primary and secondary levels of education for some time now. The effects of collaborative learning are numerous and generalizable across different populations and settings. Perhaps in reaction to this growing body of evidence and because more emphasis is being placed on quality of teaching, increasing numbers of higher education faculty have come to experiment with and adopt collaborative learning. A review of the evidence for collaborative learning reveals than in almost all the descriptions, demonstrations, and studies of collaboration, the effect of collaborative learning on performance is conflated with the possible effect of collaborative testing alone on student achievement. That is, most studies present cases where students either engaged in both collaborative learning and collaborative testing, or more commonly, engaged collaborative learning but were evaluated individually. As a result, there currently is little evidence or knowledge of the effect of collaboration on test performance independent of prior collaborative learning experience or training. This study seeks to answer the question of whether collaborative testing alone affects academic achievement, that is, when students do not also engage in collaborative learning. Literature Review Evidence of collaborative testing effects is sparse. By contrast, a large body of research has documented beneficial effects of collaborative learning across diverse populations and disciplines. Studies have found positive effects among elementary school children (Billington, 1994; Fuchs, Fuchs, Karns, Hamlet, Katzaroff, & Dutka, 1998), developmental students (Ley, Hodges & Young, 1995), and college students (Giraud & Enders, 2000; Gokhale, 1995; Grzelkowski, 1987; Guest & Murphy, 2000; Hanshaw, 1982; Helmericks, 1993; Morgan, 2003; Muir & Tracy, 1999; Nowak, Miller, & Washburn, 1996; Rau & Heyl, 1990; Reinhart, 1999; Russo & Warren, 1999; Sernau, 1995; Zimbardo, Butler, & Wolfe, 2003). Significant effects have been found across disciplines including business (Nowak et al, 1996), education (Morgan, 2003; Muir & Tracy, 1999), English composition (Russo & Warren, 1999), industrial technology (Gokhale, 1995), psychology (Guest & Murphy, 2000; Ley et al, 1995; Zimbardo et al, 2003), science (Hanshaw, 1982), sociology (Grzelkowski, 1987; Helmericks, 1993; Rau & Heyl, 1990; Reinhart, 1999; Sernau, 1995), and statistics (Giraud & Enders, 2000). These studies and others find that collaborative learning leads to gains in both academic and nonacademic areas of student development. Among the many academic gains are improved performance on exams, greater retention of information, greater transfer of knowledge, and increased complexity of thought (Gamson, 1994; Johnson, Johnson, & Stanne, 2000). Additionally, collaborative learning fosters cooperation and connections with others (Muir & Tracy, 1999; Rau & Heyl, 1990), develops skills critical to workplace success such as team building and teamwork skills (Nowak et al, 1996; Russo & Warren, 1999), humanizes the learning experience (Grzelkowski, 1987), eliminates cheating (Grzelkowski, 1987; Ley et al, 1995), and is associated with higher levels of student satisfaction and motivation to learn (Chickering & Gamson, 1991; Fuchs et al, 1998; Giraud & Enders, 2000; Semau, 1995; Slavin, 1980). …" @default.
• W20294854 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W20294854 creator A5001455724 @default.
• W20294854 creator A5077418766 @default.
• W20294854 creator A5082241149 @default.
• W20294854 date "2004-09-22" @default.
• W20294854 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W20294854 title "Collaborative Testing and Test Performance" @default.
• W20294854 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W20294854 type Work @default.
• W20294854 sameAs 20294854 @default.
• W20294854 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W20294854 countsByYear W202948542015 @default.
• W20294854 countsByYear W202948542017 @default.
• W20294854 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W20294854 hasAuthorship W20294854A5001455724 @default.
• W20294854 hasAuthorship W20294854A5077418766 @default.
• W20294854 hasAuthorship W20294854A5082241149 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C130440534 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C138020889 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C2781206393 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W20294854 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C111472728 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C130440534 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C138020889 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C138885662 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C145420912 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C151730666 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C15744967 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C2776035688 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C2777267654 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C2779530757 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C2781206393 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C46312422 @default.
• W20294854 hasConceptScore W20294854C86803240 @default.
• W20294854 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W20294854 hasLocation W202948541 @default.
• W20294854 hasOpenAccess W20294854 @default.
• W20294854 hasPrimaryLocation W202948541 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W1983519409 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W1992131008 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2003552829 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2007217032 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2050441405 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W205551002 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2079940871 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2093521908 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2104269972 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2148372071 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2150075335 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2281850695 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2338928972 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2615830793 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W2916572889 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W3001418352 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W3010060618 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W68459300 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W834417684 @default.
• W20294854 hasRelatedWork W934916300 @default.
• W20294854 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W20294854 isParatext "false" @default.
• W20294854 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W20294854 magId "20294854" @default.
• W20294854 workType "article" @default.