FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029779998> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029779998 endingPage "7" @default.
• W2029779998 startingPage "4" @default.
• W2029779998 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on Fluency and Fluency DisordersArticle1 Sep 2003Stuttering Etiology and Diagnostic Codes: Researchers’ Reflections Luc F. De Nil Luc F. De Nil University of TorontoToronto, Ontario, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/ffd13.1.4 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Adams, M. R. (1985). Laryngeal onset and reaction time of stutterers.In R.F. Curlee & W. H. Perkins (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (pp. 89–104). San Diego: College-Hill. Google Scholar Alfonso, P. J. (1991). Implications of the concepts underlying task—Dynamic modeling on kinematic studies of stuttering.In H. F. M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C. W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering (pp. 79– 100). New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar Bakker, K., & Brutten, G. J. (1987). Labial and laryngeal reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.In H. F. M. Peters & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor dynamics in stuttering (pp. 177–183). New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar Bloodstein, O. (1993). Stuttering: The search for a cause and cure.: Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar Bloodstein, O. (1995). A handbook on stuttering (4 ed.). Chicago: National Easter Seal Society. Google Scholar Caruso, A. J., Abbs, J. H., & Gracco, V. L. (1988). Kinematic analysis of multiple movement coordination during speech in stutterers.Brain, 111, 439–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Curlee, R. F. & Siegel, G. M. (1997). Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar De Nil, L. F., & Abbs, J. H. (1991). Kinaesthetic acuity of stutterers and non-stutterers for oral and non-oral movements.Brain, 114, 2145–2158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar De Nil, L. F., & Bosshardt, H. G. (2001). Studying stuttering from a neurological and cognitive information processing perspective.In H. G. Bosshardt, J. S. Yaruss, & H. F. M. Peters (Eds.), Stuttering: Research, therapy and self-help. Proceedings of the third world congress on fluency disorders (pp. 53–58). Nijmegan, Netherlands: Nijmegan University Press. Google Scholar De Nil, L. F., Kroll, R. M., & Houle, S. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of cerebellar activation during single word reading and verb generation in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.Neuroscience Letters, 302, 77–80. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar De Nil, L. F., Kroll, R. M., Kapur, S., & Houle, S. (2000). A positron emission tomography study of silent and oral reading of single words in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 43, 1038–1053. Google Scholar Forster, D. C., & Webster, W. G. (1991). Concurrent task interference in stutterers: Dissociating hemispheric specialization and activation.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 321–335. Google Scholar Fox, P. T., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Hirsch, T. B., Downs, J. H., Martin, C., Jerabek, P., Glass, Th., Lancaster, J. L., & Glass, T. (1996). A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering.Nature, 382, 158–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Horii, Y. (1984). Phonatory initiation, termination, and vocal frequency change reaction times of stutterers.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 9, 115–124. Google Scholar Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation.: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Loucks, T. M. J. & De Nil, L. F. (2001). Assessing the physiological and behavioural evidence for the role of kinesthesia in speech production.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 25, 152– 169. Google Scholar Loucks, T. M. J., & De Nil, L. F. (2001). Oral kinesthetic deficit in stuttering evaluated by movement accuracy and tendon vibration.In B. Maassen, W. Hulstijn, R. Kent, H. F. M. Peters, & P. H. H. M. Van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech. Proceedings of the Fourth International Speech Motor Conference.: Nijmegan, Netherlands: Uitgeverij Vantilt. Google Scholar Peters, H. F. M., & Van Lieshout, P. H. H. M. (1998). Delayed verbal reactions in people who do and who do not stutter.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 30, 16. Google Scholar Ratner, N. (1997). Stuttering: A psycholinguistic perspective.In R. F. Curlee & G. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed., pp. 97–127). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2 ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinematic Publishers. Google Scholar Smith, A. & Kleinow, J. (2000). Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults.Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 43, 521–536. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Smits-Bandstra, S. M., & De Nil, L. F. (2003, May). Motor learning impairment: A possible cause of stuttering., Poster presented at the Annual Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists.St. John’s, NF. Google Scholar Van Lieshout, P. H., Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H. F. M. (1991). Word size and word complexity: differences in speech reaction time between stutterers and nonstutterers in a picture and word naming task.In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C. W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering (pp. 311–324). New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar Van Lieshout, P. H., Peters, H. F., Starkweather, C. W., & Hulstijn, W. (1993). Physiological differences between stutterers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 55–63. Google Scholar Webster, R. L. (1974). Precision fluency shaping program: Speech reconstruction for stutterers.: Roanoke, VA: Communications Development Corporation. Google Scholar Webster, W. G. (1990). Evidence in bimanual finger-tapping of an attentional component to stuttering.Behavioral Brain Research, 37, 93–100. Google Scholar Webster, W. G. (1997). Principles of human brain organization related to lateralization of language and speech motor functions in normal speakers and stutterers.In W. Hulstijn, H. F. M. Peters, & P. H. H. M. Van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research and fluency disorders (pp. 119–139). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 13Issue 1September 2003Pages: 4-7 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Sep 1, 2003 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesleader-topicsCopyright & Permissions© 2003 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2029779998 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029779998 creator A5015431199 @default.
• W2029779998 date "2003-09-01" @default.
• W2029779998 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2029779998 title "Stuttering Etiology and Diagnostic Codes: Researchers’ Reflections" @default.
• W2029779998 cites W1972468180 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W1977883814 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W1990003238 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2017455040 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2021288841 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2025509009 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2038379490 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2062706232 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2072341850 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2080068570 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W2081172099 @default.
• W2029779998 cites W84855392 @default.
• W2029779998 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/ffd13.1.4" @default.
• W2029779998 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2029779998 type Work @default.
• W2029779998 sameAs 2029779998 @default.
• W2029779998 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2029779998 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2029779998 hasAuthorship W2029779998A5015431199 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C2777413886 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConcept C2781371259 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C138496976 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C138885662 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C145420912 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C15708023 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C15744967 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C2777413886 @default.
• W2029779998 hasConceptScore W2029779998C2781371259 @default.
• W2029779998 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2029779998 hasLocation W20297799981 @default.
• W2029779998 hasOpenAccess W2029779998 @default.
• W2029779998 hasPrimaryLocation W20297799981 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W1972877647 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W1983024454 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2010265499 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2021319565 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2031259514 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2050633151 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2069040010 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W2092859313 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W4243027195 @default.
• W2029779998 hasRelatedWork W4360841634 @default.
• W2029779998 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2029779998 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2029779998 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2029779998 magId "2029779998" @default.
• W2029779998 workType "article" @default.