FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2029885595> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2029885595 endingPage "633" @default.
• W2029885595 startingPage "627" @default.
• W2029885595 abstract "Background Skin testing, correlated with patient history, is the accepted method of identifying clinically relevant aeroallergen sensitivity. Traditionally, intradermal tests are believed to be more sensitive in identifying aeroallergen sensitivity than the epicutaneous and percutaneous methods. Therefore, many allergy practitioners use the epicutaneous or percutaneous method first and, if the results are negative, follow up with intradermal tests. Objectives To compare the epicutaneous, percutaneous, and intradermal methods to determine their sensitivity to patient history and to evaluate the value of intradermal tests when epicutaneous and percutaneous test results are negative. Methods Participants were evaluated for rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and then were skin tested using the prick and Multi-Test II (MTII) methods. Intradermal tests were performed when prick and MTII test results were negative to an aeroallergen. Participants with negative prick and MTII test results and corresponding positive intradermal test results underwent nasal challenges with evaluation by anterior rhinomanometry. Results Compared with patient history, average sensitivity for MTII was 77% and for the prick method was 62%. When MTII results were negative, 17% of intradermal tests corresponded with probable patient histories of allergy but none with positive nasal challenge results. Nasal challenge results were similar to those of the negative control group and significantly different from those of the positive control group (P < .001). Conclusions The MTII tests are more sensitive and equally specific compared with the prick method. When MTII results are negative, positive intradermal test results are unlikely to identify clinically relevant aeroallergen sensitivity. Routine performance of intradermal tests when MTII results are negative is likely to be of low clinical yield. Skin testing, correlated with patient history, is the accepted method of identifying clinically relevant aeroallergen sensitivity. Traditionally, intradermal tests are believed to be more sensitive in identifying aeroallergen sensitivity than the epicutaneous and percutaneous methods. Therefore, many allergy practitioners use the epicutaneous or percutaneous method first and, if the results are negative, follow up with intradermal tests. To compare the epicutaneous, percutaneous, and intradermal methods to determine their sensitivity to patient history and to evaluate the value of intradermal tests when epicutaneous and percutaneous test results are negative. Participants were evaluated for rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and then were skin tested using the prick and Multi-Test II (MTII) methods. Intradermal tests were performed when prick and MTII test results were negative to an aeroallergen. Participants with negative prick and MTII test results and corresponding positive intradermal test results underwent nasal challenges with evaluation by anterior rhinomanometry. Compared with patient history, average sensitivity for MTII was 77% and for the prick method was 62%. When MTII results were negative, 17% of intradermal tests corresponded with probable patient histories of allergy but none with positive nasal challenge results. Nasal challenge results were similar to those of the negative control group and significantly different from those of the positive control group (P < .001). The MTII tests are more sensitive and equally specific compared with the prick method. When MTII results are negative, positive intradermal test results are unlikely to identify clinically relevant aeroallergen sensitivity. Routine performance of intradermal tests when MTII results are negative is likely to be of low clinical yield." @default.
• W2029885595 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2029885595 creator A5020876182 @default.
• W2029885595 creator A5052407087 @default.
• W2029885595 creator A5055820255 @default.
• W2029885595 creator A5074485088 @default.
• W2029885595 date "2005-06-01" @default.
• W2029885595 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2029885595 title "Role of intradermal skin tests in the evaluation of clinically relevant respiratory allergy assessed using patient history and nasal challenges" @default.
• W2029885595 cites W1503104588 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W1977801998 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W1988917156 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W1993588238 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W1997414673 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2008157858 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2031598223 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2037985250 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2045756352 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2057743832 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2060212282 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2066870449 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2071104731 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2072495699 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2078144114 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2087038627 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2093230062 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2119709031 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2146167450 @default.
• W2029885595 cites W2264171217 @default.
• W2029885595 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61319-1" @default.
• W2029885595 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15984593" @default.
• W2029885595 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2029885595 type Work @default.
• W2029885595 sameAs 2029885595 @default.
• W2029885595 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952012 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952014 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952015 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952016 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952017 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952018 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952019 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952020 @default.
• W2029885595 countsByYear W20298855952021 @default.
• W2029885595 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2029885595 hasAuthorship W2029885595A5020876182 @default.
• W2029885595 hasAuthorship W2029885595A5052407087 @default.
• W2029885595 hasAuthorship W2029885595A5055820255 @default.
• W2029885595 hasAuthorship W2029885595A5074485088 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C207480886 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C2778391694 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C2778937273 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C2779279117 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C2780510475 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C141071460 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C16005928 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C203014093 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C207480886 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C2778311950 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C2778391694 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C2778937273 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C2779279117 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C2780510475 @default.
• W2029885595 hasConceptScore W2029885595C71924100 @default.
• W2029885595 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2029885595 hasLocation W20298855951 @default.
• W2029885595 hasLocation W20298855952 @default.
• W2029885595 hasOpenAccess W2029885595 @default.
• W2029885595 hasPrimaryLocation W20298855951 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W105661948 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W1770795843 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W1986190391 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W2018245697 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W2093685379 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W2159856790 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W2165461973 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W2243454005 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W3081645102 @default.
• W2029885595 hasRelatedWork W4213241407 @default.
• W2029885595 hasVolume "94" @default.
• W2029885595 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2029885595 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2029885595 magId "2029885595" @default.
• W2029885595 workType "article" @default.