FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2030078882> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2030078882 endingPage "621" @default.
• W2030078882 startingPage "621" @default.
• W2030078882 abstract "Background: Patients' loved ones often make end-of-life treatment decisions, but the accuracy of their substituted judgments and the factors associated with accuracy are poorly understood. Objective: To assess the accuracy of judgments made by surrogate decision makers; ascertain the beliefs, practices, and clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with accuracy of surrogates' decisions; assess the preferences of patients for life-sustaining treatments; and compare differences in accuracy across diagnoses. Design: Cross-sectional paired interviews. Setting: Outpatient practices of three university hospitals. Patients: 250 patients with terminal diagnoses of congestive heart failure, AIDS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (50 patient-surrogate pairs in each group) and 50 general medical patients and their surrogates. Measurements: The accuracy of surrogate predictions was measured by using scales based on 10 potential treatments in each of three hypothetical clinical scenarios. Results: Preferences varied according to mode of treatment and scenario. On average, surrogates made correct predictions in 66% of instances. Accuracy was better for the permanent coma scenario than for the scenarios of severe dementia or coma with a small chance of recovery (P < 0.001). In a binary logit model, the accuracy of substituted judgments was positively associated with the patient having spoken with the surrogate about end-of-life issues (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3]), the patient having private insurance (OR, 1.4 [CI, 1.1 to 1.7]), the surrogate's level of education (OR, 1.5 [CI, 1.2 to 1.9]), and the patient's level of education (OR, 1.7 [CI, 1.4 to 2.2]). Accuracy was negatively associated with the patient's belief that he or she would live longer than 10 years (OR, 0.6 [CI, 0.5 to 0.7]), surrogate experience with life-sustaining treatment (OR, 0.4 [CI, 0.3 to 0.5]), surrogate participation in religious services (OR, 0.67 [CI, 0.50 to 0.91]), and a diagnosis of heart failure (OR, 0.6 [CI, 0.5 to 0.8]). Age, ethnicity, marital status, religion, and advance directives were not associated with accuracy. Conclusions: The accuracy of substituted judgments is associated with multiple clinically apparent patient and surrogate factors. This information can help clinicians identify conditions under which substituted judgments are likely to be accurate or inaccurate and can help target populations for education designed to improve the accuracy of surrogate decision making." @default.
• W2030078882 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5009791775 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5030762636 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5037162509 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5044802821 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5048927454 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5067104242 @default.
• W2030078882 creator A5071270866 @default.
• W2030078882 date "1998-04-15" @default.
• W2030078882 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2030078882 title "The Accuracy of Substituted Judgments in Patients with Terminal Diagnoses" @default.
• W2030078882 cites W123436534 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1505034167 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W170970116 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1977988586 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1983897914 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1985769962 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1989181818 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1989917485 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2000826477 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2003557270 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2010113059 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2016022016 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2020214980 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2033839380 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2035131854 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2044987352 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2074200156 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2077211833 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2083754880 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2095526348 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2125673224 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2155940715 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2167327554 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2176965193 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2226456737 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2283181605 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2335179008 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2444277876 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2475335472 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W1967092342 @default.
• W2030078882 cites W2090965393 @default.
• W2030078882 doi "https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00002" @default.
• W2030078882 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9867782" @default.
• W2030078882 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2030078882 type Work @default.
• W2030078882 sameAs 2030078882 @default.
• W2030078882 citedByCount "282" @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822012 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822013 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822014 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822015 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822016 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822017 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822018 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822019 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822020 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822021 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822022 @default.
• W2030078882 countsByYear W20300788822023 @default.
• W2030078882 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5009791775 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5030762636 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5037162509 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5044802821 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5048927454 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5067104242 @default.
• W2030078882 hasAuthorship W2030078882A5071270866 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C100136789 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C141341695 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C100136789 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C120665830 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C121332964 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C126322002 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C141341695 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C142724271 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C143095724 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C151956035 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C156957248 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C1862650 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C534262118 @default.
• W2030078882 hasConceptScore W2030078882C71924100 @default.
• W2030078882 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2030078882 hasLocation W20300788821 @default.
• W2030078882 hasLocation W20300788822 @default.
• W2030078882 hasOpenAccess W2030078882 @default.
• W2030078882 hasPrimaryLocation W20300788821 @default.

• next