Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2030129988> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2030129988 endingPage "81" @default.
- W2030129988 startingPage "53" @default.
- W2030129988 abstract "AbstractThirty-four participants with acquired brain injury learned word lists under two forms of vanishing cues – one in which the learning trial instructions encouraged intentional retrieval (i.e., explicit memory) and one in which they encouraged automatic retrieval (which encompasses implicit memory). The automatic instructions represented a novel approach in which the cooperation of participants was actively sought to avoid intentional retrieval. Intentional instructions resulted in fewer errors during the learning trials and better performance on immediate and delayed retrieval tests. The advantage of intentional over automatic instructions was generally less for those who had more severe memory and/or executive impairments. Most participants performed better under intentional instructions on both the immediate and the delayed tests. Although those who were more severely impaired in both memory and executive function also did better with intentional instructions on the immediate retrieval test, they were significantly more likely to show an advantage for automatic instructions on the delayed test. It is suggested that this pattern of results may reflect impairments in the consolidation of intentional memories in this group. When using vanishing cues, automatic instructions may be better for those with severe consolidation impairments, but otherwise intentional instructions may be better.Keywords: Cognitive rehabilitationMethod of vanishing cuesImplicit memoryExplicit memoryAcquired brain injury Notes1Age-adjusted scaled scores (derived from the test manuals) were also considered as the basis for categorising the participants into the executive and memory groups. All participants were classified in the same way whether using raw Tower Test scores or age-adjusted ones, and three participants were differently classified using raw Word List scores compared to age-adjusted ones. When the high-low memory classifications using the age-adjusted scores were used in the analyses instead of those based on the raw scores, there were negligible differences in terms of the outcome of the analysis and the overall pattern of significant/non-significant results was the same.2Galea et al. (Citation2010) used the concepts of procedural and declarative memory, rather than automatic and intentional memory. However, within a process-oriented approach (Jacoby, Citation1991), the emphasis is on process rather than content, and the procedural/declarative distinction is subsumed under the broader automatic/intentional framework." @default.
- W2030129988 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2030129988 creator A5038493168 @default.
- W2030129988 creator A5050671152 @default.
- W2030129988 date "2014-07-28" @default.
- W2030129988 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W2030129988 title "A comparison of automatic and intentional instructions when using the method of vanishing cues in acquired brain injury" @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1503404806 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1967460834 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1969173678 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1969426315 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1970370734 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1977963497 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1982172559 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W1992067685 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2003128414 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2009628111 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2012292507 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2015710228 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2018944686 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2020659132 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2021625970 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2024172303 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2027380211 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2041940874 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2045767666 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2059542077 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2064370237 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2065978720 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2072732849 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2076187298 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2085483909 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2085738023 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2091034979 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2091710594 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2099071333 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2108795312 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2115607807 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2120388393 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2121652994 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2145247789 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2159511869 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W2171409554 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W4232982248 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W4247530695 @default.
- W2030129988 cites W4255378338 @default.
- W2030129988 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.941294" @default.
- W2030129988 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25066788" @default.
- W2030129988 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2030129988 type Work @default.
- W2030129988 sameAs 2030129988 @default.
- W2030129988 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882016 @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882017 @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882020 @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882021 @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882022 @default.
- W2030129988 countsByYear W20301299882023 @default.
- W2030129988 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2030129988 hasAuthorship W2030129988A5038493168 @default.
- W2030129988 hasAuthorship W2030129988A5050671152 @default.
- W2030129988 hasBestOaLocation W20301299882 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C15686315 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C151730666 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C15686315 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C15744967 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C169760540 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C169900460 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C180747234 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C2777267654 @default.
- W2030129988 hasConceptScore W2030129988C86803240 @default.
- W2030129988 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2030129988 hasLocation W20301299881 @default.
- W2030129988 hasLocation W20301299882 @default.
- W2030129988 hasLocation W20301299883 @default.
- W2030129988 hasLocation W20301299884 @default.
- W2030129988 hasOpenAccess W2030129988 @default.
- W2030129988 hasPrimaryLocation W20301299881 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W1491728914 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W1985472811 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2007114331 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2050217276 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2052995928 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2067265876 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2091081954 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2098172486 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2137369694 @default.
- W2030129988 hasRelatedWork W2167126513 @default.
- W2030129988 hasVolume "25" @default.
- W2030129988 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2030129988 isRetracted "false" @default.