Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031142972> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W2031142972 endingPage "23" @default.
- W2031142972 startingPage "13" @default.
- W2031142972 abstract "The aim of this study was to determine whether Subjective Interpretation of paper markings is a reliable method for identifying the relative occlusal force content of tooth contacts.295 clinicians selected the Most Forceful and Least Forceful occlusal contacts in six occlusal-view photographs of articulating paper marks that were later compared against computerized occlusal analysis relative occlusal force measurements of the same tooth contacts. Means and standard deviations were calculated by years in clinical practice and by number of occlusion courses taken. A Chi-square analysis was also performed.The mean correct for 295 participant dentists was 1.53 (+/- 1.234). There were no significant differences found for years in practice (P>0.16) or number of occlusion courses taken (P>0.75). The Chi-square analysis showed a sensitivity of 12.6%, a specificity of 12.4%, a positive predictive value of 12.58%, and a negative predictive value of 12.42%. Chance was calculated at 12.5% correct.Subjective Interpretation is an ineffective clinical method for determining the relative occlusal force content of tooth contacts. The reported low scores obtained from a large group of participant dentists suggest clinicians are unable to reliably differentiate high and low occlusal force from looking at articulating paper marks. This longstanding method of visually observing articulating paper marks for occlusal contact force content should be replaced with a measurement-based, objective method." @default.
- W2031142972 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2031142972 creator A5030544921 @default.
- W2031142972 creator A5051130267 @default.
- W2031142972 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W2031142972 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2031142972 title "Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings" @default.
- W2031142972 cites W130056676 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W1992352578 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W1995575612 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W2004663840 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W2014792373 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W2099596387 @default.
- W2031142972 cites W2475675967 @default.
- W2031142972 doi "https://doi.org/10.1179/0886963413z.0000000001" @default.
- W2031142972 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24660642" @default.
- W2031142972 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2031142972 type Work @default.
- W2031142972 sameAs 2031142972 @default.
- W2031142972 citedByCount "54" @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722015 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722016 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722017 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722018 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722019 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722020 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722021 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722022 @default.
- W2031142972 countsByYear W20311429722023 @default.
- W2031142972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2031142972 hasAuthorship W2031142972A5030544921 @default.
- W2031142972 hasAuthorship W2031142972A5051130267 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C2776268601 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C2910043486 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C3019719930 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C126322002 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C141071460 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C15744967 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C1862650 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C199343813 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C2776268601 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C2779974597 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C2910043486 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C29694066 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C3019719930 @default.
- W2031142972 hasConceptScore W2031142972C71924100 @default.
- W2031142972 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2031142972 hasLocation W20311429721 @default.
- W2031142972 hasLocation W20311429722 @default.
- W2031142972 hasOpenAccess W2031142972 @default.
- W2031142972 hasPrimaryLocation W20311429721 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W161154196 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2186508699 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2216417833 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2328658080 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2329226522 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2400441502 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2999343398 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W3116295004 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W4290599986 @default.
- W2031142972 hasRelatedWork W2184054086 @default.
- W2031142972 hasVolume "32" @default.
- W2031142972 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2031142972 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2031142972 magId "2031142972" @default.
- W2031142972 workType "article" @default.