Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031254114> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2031254114 endingPage "127" @default.
- W2031254114 startingPage "97" @default.
- W2031254114 abstract "It remains an elusive goal to integrate economic and productive uses of land, whilst avoiding biophysical constraints and environmental risks as well as being sensitive to the wishes of immediate stakeholders and broader society. We review a number of approaches that have been used to order land use data, and present them to planners and decision makers in a more integrated way. We note that for every numeric planning methodology there are numerous criticisms, which have led to a strategic retreat of numeracy from the public and political spheres. It seems that the art of planning is again more powerful than the science of planning. Many parts of the mountainlands of New Zealand's South Island are in transition. Traditional land uses such as pastoral sheep farming are under economic and environmental pressures. Much of the change is slow, painful and confrontational, and there can be more losers than winners. While we seek to redress such ecological imbalances, it is becoming apparent that visions are needed, rather than maintaining a fond hope of retreating to the land uses of yesteryear. In a pilot study on 225 000 ha of the Mackenzie Basin, we developed and compared a number of future land use scenarios, using the LUPIS “rating and weighting” decision support tool. LUPIS develops scenarios by using the interaction of spatial data, planning rules and a socially-based voting process. Using a number of social preferences obtained from workshops and seminars, we obtained the likely land use make-up based on the voting patterns of three groups, viz. a technocrat, a green and a forest-green group. In all scenarios, the incumbent pastoral land use declined from its present 83% occupancy to a range of 9–26%. Production forestry could increase from its present <1% to a range of 13–34%. Conservation and recreation could increase from its present 6% to a range of 30–40% of the land area. As a pilot project, this sought to prove the methodology at a practical scale. It did not seek to enter the full consultation process required of a proper scenario development for future planning needs. Because of this, the study has already attracted its fair share of criticism. Nevertheless it has allowed ordered, numeric and transparent planning procedures to once again be the subject of critical discussion. Scenario development using numeric procedures may yet be taken up by regional government and local farmer groups, as a way of looking into the future of land use at a broader scale than the individual farm management unit." @default.
- W2031254114 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2031254114 creator A5030707132 @default.
- W2031254114 creator A5076276295 @default.
- W2031254114 date "1995-02-01" @default.
- W2031254114 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2031254114 title "Transitions in land use and the problems of planning: a case study from the mountainlands of New Zealand" @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1410257041 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1537251354 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1668418461 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1972779200 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1983620156 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W1998287582 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2006432506 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2007585058 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2019635351 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2031647819 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2058815290 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2073431900 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2078673076 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2091606393 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2093420862 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2171837823 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2498941739 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2519757973 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2528396499 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W254350088 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W265805343 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W3125104443 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W336168312 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W591259124 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W612585149 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W638321642 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2052276086 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2474642077 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2524202079 @default.
- W2031254114 cites W2524612236 @default.
- W2031254114 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4797(95)90101-9" @default.
- W2031254114 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
- W2031254114 type Work @default.
- W2031254114 sameAs 2031254114 @default.
- W2031254114 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W2031254114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2031254114 hasAuthorship W2031254114A5030707132 @default.
- W2031254114 hasAuthorship W2031254114A5076276295 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C133979268 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C184603391 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C2776515129 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C2776873942 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C4792198 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C520049643 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C10138342 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C107826830 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C127413603 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C133979268 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C144024400 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C144133560 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C147176958 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C162324750 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C17744445 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C182306322 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C184603391 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C19165224 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C199539241 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C205649164 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C2776515129 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C2776873942 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C4792198 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C520049643 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C91375879 @default.
- W2031254114 hasConceptScore W2031254114C94625758 @default.
- W2031254114 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2031254114 hasLocation W20312541141 @default.
- W2031254114 hasOpenAccess W2031254114 @default.
- W2031254114 hasPrimaryLocation W20312541141 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2011729447 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2066170553 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2105397468 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2356554400 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2357029666 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W2370495529 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W3152561130 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W3196101543 @default.
- W2031254114 hasRelatedWork W4241371082 @default.