Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031295105> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2031295105 endingPage "91" @default.
- W2031295105 startingPage "86" @default.
- W2031295105 abstract "The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) has investigated the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to evaluate several aspects of low back pain in patients. The score includes five categories (25 items) selected from the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36, and a visual analogue scale. Japanese physicians have recently used these scores to evaluate back pain; however, the efficacy has not been fully explored in large-scale studies. In the current study, we used the JOABPEQ to evaluate lumbar spinal disease in 555 patients (with lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar disc degeneration/spondylosis) in multiple spine centers and compared the results based on age, sex, and type of disease.A total of 555 patients who had low back or leg pain were selected in 22 hospitals in Chiba Prefecture. Spine surgeons diagnosed their disease type based on symptoms, physical examination, radiography images, and magnetic resonance imaging. In all, 486 patients were diagnosed with spinal stenosis (239 patients), disc degeneration/spondylosis (143 patients), or disc herniation (104 patients). The other 69 patients were diagnosed with spondylolysis (16 patients) or other diseases (53 patients). The pain score in all patients was evaluated using the JOABPEQ (from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst pain).The age of the patients was 56.1 +/- 13.3 years (mean +/- SD); the age of patients in the disc herniation and disc degeneration/spondylosis group was significantly lower than that in the spinal stenosis group. The average JOABPEQ scores in all patients were, for low back pain, 47.1; lumbar function, 53.6; walking ability, 54.8; social life function, 48.7; and mental health, 48.3. The low back pain score in men was significantly worse than that in women. In contrast, the mental health score in women was significantly higher than that in men. The low back pain score in patients <40 years old and the walking ability score in patients >65 years old were significantly lower than those scores in other patients. Based on the disease type, low back pain, lumbar function, social life function, and mental health scores for patients with disc herniation were significantly worse than for those with spinal stenosis.JOABPEQ scores were evaluated for several lumbar diseases. The average of five categories of JOABPEQ scores in all patients was similarly distributed. However, the average scores in the five categories were significantly different depending on age, sex, and type of disease. Compared with prior mass data (baseline data on the observational cohort of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial in the United States), many data were similar based on the type of disease in the current study. Furthermore, the JOABPEQ is easy to use compared with the SF-36. Hence, we concluded that the JOABPEQ could be used worldwide as a tool for evaluating low back pain." @default.
- W2031295105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5000880751 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5005152328 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5007720145 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5009389425 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5010917785 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5011530088 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5012091563 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5013482603 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5015396057 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5016097167 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5026056774 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5026647632 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5031444645 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5032748048 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5038274081 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5039120103 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5039307853 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5043749347 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5044026829 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5049608115 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5050846261 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5057798611 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5058778165 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5061477648 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5065472017 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5070370750 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5073886889 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5078525396 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5079129658 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5080980467 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5081299624 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5084972964 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5087189516 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5088912591 @default.
- W2031295105 creator A5091328672 @default.
- W2031295105 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2031295105 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2031295105 title "Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease" @default.
- W2031295105 cites W1954265004 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W1983487845 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W1993585602 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W1996434962 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2022181259 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2029423563 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2042217928 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2060091110 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2095049373 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2118516436 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2133692882 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2143655903 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W2318124506 @default.
- W2031295105 cites W4292806894 @default.
- W2031295105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1426-8" @default.
- W2031295105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20151256" @default.
- W2031295105 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2031295105 type Work @default.
- W2031295105 sameAs 2031295105 @default.
- W2031295105 citedByCount "56" @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052012 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052013 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052014 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052015 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052016 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052017 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052018 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052019 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052020 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052021 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052022 @default.
- W2031295105 countsByYear W20312951052023 @default.
- W2031295105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5000880751 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5005152328 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5007720145 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5009389425 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5010917785 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5011530088 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5012091563 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5013482603 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5015396057 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5016097167 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5026056774 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5026647632 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5031444645 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5032748048 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5038274081 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5039120103 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5039307853 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5043749347 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5044026829 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5049608115 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5050846261 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5057798611 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5058778165 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5061477648 @default.
- W2031295105 hasAuthorship W2031295105A5065472017 @default.