FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031386136> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031386136 abstract "I have read the article “Consequences of spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)” by Suvi Virupaksha [1] with interest. The unpredictable outcome of spilled gallstones that are left un-retrieved during LC is often a cause of future embarrassment for the operating surgeon. So, it comes as a surprise that most instances of unrecovered spilled gallstones are neither documented in the operation notes nor disclosed to the patients.This prospective observational study was carried out in 150 (1 gallbladder polyp, 2 acalculous cholecystitis, and 147 gallstones) patients of LC over a period of one year. There are many glaring inconsistencies in the presented data that merit clarification by the author. The table outlining the ultrasound findings mentioned of 10 patients with solitary gallstone while multiple stones were detected in 135 patients. This amounts to a total of 145 instead of 147 patients with gallstone disease. Similarly, the sum total of patients of the three different groups categorized on the basis of stone size is 156 instead of 147. The author has variably reported the incidence of gallstone spillage in this article (19.04 % in the text and 18.91 % in the table). All the instances of gallstone spillage in this series were secondary to gallbladder perforations, but in the table comparing the results of the present study with international data, the reported incidence of spillage is more than that of gallbladder perforation. The various mechanisms responsible for gallbladder perforation are detailed in a tabular form; however, the numbers mentioned against different mechanisms are quite confusing as they are neither adding up to the total number of patients nor to the percentage of patients with spilled stones. The author has boasted of zero percent incidence of un-retrieved gallstones, but at the same time, mentioned of a patient with port-site wound complication secondary to a left out gallstone in the subcutaneous plane.The author could have analyzed the incidence of spilled stones in relation to the incidence of complicated gallstone disease, aberrant ultrasound findings, and abnormal histopathological reports to predict risk factors for gallbladder perforation and stone spillage. Mention of any special effort made to locate and retrieve the spilled stones during LC, any change in the duration of postoperative antibiotics to counteract the increased risk of infective complications consequent to intraoperative spillage of bile and stones would have been immensely beneficial to the numerous readers keen on mastering the art of this common laparoscopic procedure.The author has summarized the study with a list of suggestions to reduce the rate of stone spillage during LC. Few other additions to this list can be as follows: secure grasping of the neck of the excised gallbladder along with the cystic duct clip during extraction, adequate enlargement of the port site for smooth extrication followed by meticulous examination of the retrieved specimen for integrity of the gallbladder wall. Any defect in the wall should prompt repeat inspection of all the relevant intra-peritoneal recesses as well as the path of extrication of the gallbladder." @default.
• W2031386136 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031386136 creator A5056920787 @default.
• W2031386136 date "2014-08-03" @default.
• W2031386136 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2031386136 title "Data Conflicts: the Dwindling Power of a Study" @default.
• W2031386136 cites W2057841417 @default.
• W2031386136 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-014-1154-y" @default.
• W2031386136 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4376832" @default.
• W2031386136 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25829723" @default.
• W2031386136 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2031386136 type Work @default.
• W2031386136 sameAs 2031386136 @default.
• W2031386136 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2031386136 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031386136 hasAuthorship W2031386136A5056920787 @default.
• W2031386136 hasBestOaLocation W20313861361 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2777148285 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2779388726 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2779640004 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C2780354107 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C120665830 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C121332964 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C126322002 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C127413603 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C141071460 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C191897082 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C192562407 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2776641081 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2777148285 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2778456384 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2778527123 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2779388726 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2779640004 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C2780354107 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C548081761 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C61434518 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C61511704 @default.
• W2031386136 hasConceptScore W2031386136C71924100 @default.
• W2031386136 hasLocation W20313861361 @default.
• W2031386136 hasLocation W20313861362 @default.
• W2031386136 hasLocation W20313861363 @default.
• W2031386136 hasOpenAccess W2031386136 @default.
• W2031386136 hasPrimaryLocation W20313861361 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2136180645 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2216817687 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2323306710 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2743539335 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2746862840 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2946071038 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2949263084 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2955504986 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W2955725829 @default.
• W2031386136 hasRelatedWork W3207471580 @default.
• W2031386136 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2031386136 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2031386136 magId "2031386136" @default.
• W2031386136 workType "article" @default.