FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031463145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031463145 abstract "Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and the predictive value of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in the assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer by meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were identified by systematic searches of PUBMED and COCHRANE databases, published in English. To ensure homogeneity of all included studies, selection criteria were established and all the studies were scored according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria. Meta-analysis was done on the diagnostic performance data from eligible studies. Draw funnel plots to explore the publication bias. Draw forest plots to exclude abnormal data(s). Use Spearman correlation coefficients p, likelihood ratio x2 test and I2 index in order to indicate heterogeneity. Estimate and compare the weighted summary sensitivities (SEs), specificities (SPs), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves of PET and other examinations (measuring the size of tumor). Subgroup analyses were performed to identify heterogeneity potential sources. Do Z test to find significant difference between each results. Results: 27 groups of data in 19 eligible studies were included with a total of 1164 subjects evaluated by 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT and 291 ones evaluated by other examinations. Funnel plots showed the existence of publication bias. Spearman correlation coefficients p, likelihood ratio x2 test and I2 index explored the heterogeneity. The Results of the Weighted Summary: SEPET was significantly higher than SED [83.7% (329/393) vs. 59.0% (98/166), p SPPET was significantly higher than SPD [66.8% (512/766) vs. 40.8% (51/125), p DORPET was significantly higher than DORD (14.02 vs. 1.29, p AUCPET and Q*PET were both significantly higher than AUCD and Q*D (AUCs 0.8838 vs. 0.6046; Q*s 0.8143 vs. 0.5788, p st or 2nd cycle of NAC was a litter better than later with higher SE (p = 0.083). Standardized uptake value (SUV) reduction rate between 40% and 45% as FDG-PET response threshold value was used for its highest SP (p = 0.01), while no significant difference was found comparing SEs and DORs (p > 0.05). Trend of higher SE and lower SP were found at ER negative breast cancers than ER positive ones (SEs 93.94% vs. 83.33%; SPs 35.76% vs. 62.24%), though Z test did not find significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that FDG-PET or PET/CT does have a higher global accuracy in assessing the response for NAC in breast cancer. Comparing with clinical response, metabolic response plays a potential role in directing therapy for breast cancer. Factors which affected the accuracy of FDG-PET assessment included PET timing point, SUV reduction rate as threshold value and ER expression." @default.
• W2031463145 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5011688144 @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5034416132 @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5036031567 @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5037993198 @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5050625539 @default.
• W2031463145 creator A5053204257 @default.
• W2031463145 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2031463145 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2031463145 title "Meta-Analysis: ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer" @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1762109430 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1795764517 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1963755646 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1969319564 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1972112174 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1975260285 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1976128207 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1980211486 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1980580277 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W1993214850 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2006745136 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2012178600 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2025312214 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2032220068 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2036509554 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2038259352 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2051570510 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2058085109 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2060652806 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2068554135 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2078386677 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2082976808 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2083723853 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2084388762 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2086353780 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2087179076 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2090168046 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2109020284 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2113009004 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2116778948 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2118404651 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2132760199 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2139510434 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2147493587 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2153369531 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2156681954 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2159710773 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2163403096 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2167674154 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2177221443 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2433836614 @default.
• W2031463145 cites W2477183992 @default.
• W2031463145 doi "https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2012.325086" @default.
• W2031463145 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2031463145 type Work @default.
• W2031463145 sameAs 2031463145 @default.
• W2031463145 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2031463145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5011688144 @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5034416132 @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5036031567 @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5037993198 @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5050625539 @default.
• W2031463145 hasAuthorship W2031463145A5053204257 @default.
• W2031463145 hasBestOaLocation W20314631451 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C157481446 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C82605166 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C117220453 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C121608353 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C126322002 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C143998085 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C157481446 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C187960798 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C2524010 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C2780439572 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C2989005 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C33923547 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C530470458 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C58471807 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C71924100 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C82605166 @default.
• W2031463145 hasConceptScore W2031463145C95190672 @default.
• W2031463145 hasLocation W20314631451 @default.
• W2031463145 hasOpenAccess W2031463145 @default.
• W2031463145 hasPrimaryLocation W20314631451 @default.
• W2031463145 hasRelatedWork W2004345432 @default.

• next