FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031517209> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031517209 endingPage "84" @default.
• W2031517209 startingPage "69" @default.
• W2031517209 abstract "Scottish Journal of Political EconomyVolume 41, Issue 1 p. 69-84 PRODUCTION GAINS: SHOULD THEY COUNT IN HEALTH CARE EVALUATIONS? Jan Abel Olsen, Jan Abel Olsen *Department of Economics, University of Troms, NorwaySearch for more papers by this author Jan Abel Olsen, Jan Abel Olsen *Department of Economics, University of Troms, NorwaySearch for more papers by this author First published: February 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1994.tb01111.xCitations: 8AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Drummond, M. F., Stoddart, G. L. AND Torrance, G. W. (1987). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Drummond, M. F., Brandt, A., Luce, B. AND Rovira, J. (1993). Standardising methodologies for economic evaluation in health care: Practice, problems, and potential. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 9, 1, pp. 26– 36. Gerard, K. (1991). A review of cost utility studies: assessing their policy making relevance. HERU Discussion Paper 11–91. University of Aberdeen. Gerard, K. AND Mooney, G. (1993). QALY league tables: handle with care. Health Economics, 2 pp. 59– 64. Henke, K. D. AND Behrens, C. S. (1986). The economic cost of illness in the Federal Republic of Germany in the year 1980. Health Policy, 6, pp. 119– 143. Hodgson, T. AND Meiners, M. (1982). Cost of illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 60, pp. 429– 462. Luce, B. R. AND Elixhauser, A. (1990). Standards for Socioeconomic Evaluation of Health Care Products and Services. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Mooney, G. (1977). The Valuation of Human Life. Macmillan, London. Mushkin, S. J. (1962). Health as an investment. Journal of Political Economy, LXX 5,2. Nygaard, E. AND Olsen, J. A. (1992). A model for discussing the consequences of including production gains in economic evaluation of health care programmes. Working paper, Folkehelsa, Oslo. Ratcliffe, J. (1993). The measurement of indirect costs in economic evaluation: a critical review. Paper presented to the UK Health Economists' Study Group meeting, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 30th June-2nd July. Rice, D. AND Cooper, B. (1967). The economic value of human life. American Journal of Public Health, 57, pp. 1954– 66. Richardson, J. (1991). Economic Assessment of Health Care: Theory and Practice. The Australian Economic Review pp. 4– 21. Schieber, G. J. AND Poullier, J. P. (1990). Overview of international comparisons of health care expenditures, OECD Social Policy Studies, 7. Swell, A., Gerard, K. AND Donaldson, C. (1987). Cost of illness studies: an aid to decision-making? Health Policy, 8, pp. 317– 323. Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, pp. 1– 30. Williams, A. (1992). Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical? Journal of Medical Ethics, 18, pp. 37– 42. Wiseman, J. (1963). Cost-benefit analysis and health service policy. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 10, pp. 128– 45. Citing Literature Volume41, Issue1February 1994Pages 69-84 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W2031517209 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031517209 creator A5052181611 @default.
• W2031517209 date "1994-02-01" @default.
• W2031517209 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2031517209 title "PRODUCTION GAINS: SHOULD THEY COUNT IN HEALTH CARE EVALUATIONS?" @default.
• W2031517209 cites W1537598136 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W1627560665 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W1974355070 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W1979222700 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W1995405099 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2045974227 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2079199900 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2079286262 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2081169337 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2084466815 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W2165613296 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W4214935841 @default.
• W2031517209 cites W619411938 @default.
• W2031517209 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1994.tb01111.x" @default.
• W2031517209 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W2031517209 type Work @default.
• W2031517209 sameAs 2031517209 @default.
• W2031517209 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2031517209 countsByYear W20315172092014 @default.
• W2031517209 countsByYear W20315172092016 @default.
• W2031517209 countsByYear W20315172092020 @default.
• W2031517209 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031517209 hasAuthorship W2031517209A5052181611 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C144024400 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C160735492 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C161191863 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C17744445 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C199539241 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C2778805511 @default.
• W2031517209 hasConceptScore W2031517209C41008148 @default.
• W2031517209 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2031517209 hasLocation W20315172091 @default.
• W2031517209 hasOpenAccess W2031517209 @default.
• W2031517209 hasPrimaryLocation W20315172091 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W1991916714 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W2013735104 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W2126189245 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W2142127890 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W2182399872 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W2322382814 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W3198614086 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W4225528844 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W4231226515 @default.
• W2031517209 hasRelatedWork W4232745934 @default.
• W2031517209 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W2031517209 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2031517209 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2031517209 magId "2031517209" @default.
• W2031517209 workType "article" @default.