FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031551248> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031551248 endingPage "66" @default.
• W2031551248 startingPage "43" @default.
• W2031551248 abstract "“The Great Pioneer of National Socialist Philosophy”?:Carlyle and Twentieth-Century Totalitarianism David R. Sorensen (bio) Thomas Carlyle occupies a highly unusual place in any discussion of twentieth-century totalitarian political religions. He was the first historian in the nineteenth century to recognize and to re-create the French Revolution as a spiritual as well as a political phenomenon. Well before Alexis de Tocqueville and Jules Michelet, Carlyle understood that the most salient aspect of the Sansculottes’ “Gospel according to Jean-Jacques” was its absolute repudiation of the past and its messianic embrace of a purified future, worshipped and sanctified in popular public rituals, symbols, and liturgies (Works 2: 54).1 In The French Revolution, he unfolded with an equal mixture of scorn and pity the tragic consequences of the Jacobins’ brutal attempts to harness the inchoate religious sentiments of “le peuple” towards the creation of a “new Political Evangel” (Works 2: 128). Yet, by the conclusion of the twentieth century, Carlyle—the first and most prescient prophet of “the totalitarian temptation”2 —was himself bracketed with those “heroic vitalists” who had inspired Nazi and Bolshevik projectors to realize their respective versions of an earthly paradise through unprecedented mass indoctrination and violence.3 His name became associated with the worst excesses of mechanistic social engineering that he had so memorably denounced in his greatest history. In the immediate aftermath of World War II, those who still believed in Carlyle’s message were at an obvious disadvantage in their bids to defend him. His notorious views on slavery, democracy, Negroes, Jews, and Irish Catholics inevitably linked him to the diabolical forces that had ravaged Europe. At best, he could be defended as a misanthropic opponent of Benthamite liberalism who thrived on paradox and Swiftian satire, and who deliberately used inflammatory language to stimulate his opponents and to generate debate. The German philosopher Ernst Cassirer,4 one of his subtlest advocates, pointed out in his posthumously published The Myth of the State that to “read into Carlyle’s work … a definite philosophical construction of the historical process … or a definite political program is precarious and illusive” (191). Others tried to isolate Carlyle from what [End Page 43] Michael Burleigh has called the “dystopian stain” of twentieth-century political religions by confining him in a Victorian context (xi). According to this thesis, he could not have foreseen how the widespread longing for political harmony in his own century would later be exploited and perverted by those who misused science and technology to cleanse history of human-perceived imperfection. Like Nietzsche, with whom he has often been compared, Carlyle could not be blamed for how his writings were interpreted in either Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. Of Nietzsche, Karl Löwith has asserted that the attempt to unburden [him] of … intellectual “guilt,” or even to claim his support against what he brought about is just as unfounded as the reverse effort to make him the advocate of a matter over which he sits in judgment. Both [arguments] crumble before the historical insight that “forerunners” have ever prepared roads for others which they themselves did not travel. (200) In the twenty-first century, such arguments themselves tend to “crumble” under the weight of accumulated barbarism, particularly when they are employed in relation to Carlyle. Responding to the example of Nietzsche, the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski has shrewdly observed, The Nazis told their supermen to read The Will to Power, and it is no good saying that this was a mere chance…. It is not a question of establishing the “guilt” of Nietzsche, who as an individual was not responsible for the use made of his writings; nevertheless, the fact that they were so used is bound to cause alarm and cannot be dismissed as irrelevant to the understanding of what was in his mind. (7–8)5 The Nazis also instructed their followers to read Carlyle, whom the American-born Anglophone fascist William Joyce called “the great pioneer of National-Socialist philosophy” (36). Carlyle’s well-documented ties to Hitler, as well as his lesser-known links to Lenin and Stalin, remain deeply troubling.6 His connections to their violent ideologies should neither be underestimated..." @default.
• W2031551248 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031551248 creator A5019431872 @default.
• W2031551248 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2031551248 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2031551248 title "“The Great Pioneer of National Socialist Philosophy”?: Carlyle and Twentieth-Century Totalitarianism" @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1499327630 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1521627667 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1531857622 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1532639568 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1555211589 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1562965970 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1586682724 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1594976051 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1973322183 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W1979349747 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2042214057 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2074028058 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2093728207 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2112640788 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2326967280 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2477435346 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2797372230 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2909138768 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2968909669 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W3165468630 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W598252326 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W599727763 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W608838652 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W625169345 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W629706322 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W638543509 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W642456972 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W653161877 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W655271424 @default.
• W2031551248 cites W2619114497 @default.
• W2031551248 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2012.0000" @default.
• W2031551248 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2031551248 type Work @default.
• W2031551248 sameAs 2031551248 @default.
• W2031551248 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2031551248 countsByYear W20315512482012 @default.
• W2031551248 countsByYear W20315512482019 @default.
• W2031551248 countsByYear W20315512482022 @default.
• W2031551248 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031551248 hasAuthorship W2031551248A5019431872 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C2776721811 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C2777976675 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C5616717 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C124952713 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C138885662 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C142362112 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C17744445 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C199539241 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C2776721811 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C2777976675 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C5616717 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C74916050 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C94625758 @default.
• W2031551248 hasConceptScore W2031551248C95457728 @default.
• W2031551248 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2031551248 hasLocation W20315512481 @default.
• W2031551248 hasOpenAccess W2031551248 @default.
• W2031551248 hasPrimaryLocation W20315512481 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2028623505 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2031551248 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2567695643 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2570590368 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2798707059 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W4302981904 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W4365807927 @default.
• W2031551248 hasRelatedWork W654606612 @default.
• W2031551248 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2031551248 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2031551248 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2031551248 magId "2031551248" @default.
• W2031551248 workType "article" @default.