FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031567691> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031567691 abstract "A: Why should you get this scarce resource rather than I? B: Because I'm least good you are. A: Ah, hah! There you go, violating Neutrality again! B: How so? As Ackerman made me say on p. 334 in reply to that same exclamation, a claim that one is at least good as someone else doesn't violate his rule of Neutrality.' A: And what he made me say on the same page was something to the effect that I could just see that it did. What I would like to have said is something else. Of course the claim doesn't violate the rule he set it up back p. 11, since that rule refers only to claims of superiority for oneself or one's conception of the good. But it is unreasonable for him to set it up that way. B: He couldn't get the results without that form of the rule. A: I think that's so. But now consider. You just said that you're least good I am. Is that really what you mean? B: Well, to tell you the truth, I said it because that's what everyone round here seems to say that point in the conversation. In fact, I'm not really sure what superior means. If you really want to know, I suspect that I may be intrinsically inferior to you. I'm sure I'm stupider, nastier, and more cowardly, and I'm certainly shorter on patience.... A: Do you think that that sort of thing means intrinsically inferior? B: I seem to have mislaid Ackerman's directions on that. But least it means actually inferior, and Ackerman does say that the great thing about this place, unlike behind that dreary veil, is that you don't have to forget who you are and what you're like. A: But, anyway, if you think you are inferior to me, how can you possibly ground a claim to more of this stuff? B: Well, neither of us has mentioned what the stuff is, and it greatly depends on what it is, what possible connection there could be between its distribution and anyone's superiority (as I think Fishkin pointed out). But let's say: compensation. It's dreary being horrible I am. This material stuff, Plato suggested in an earlier dialogue, will help to make up for it. Can't I say that? It doesn't seem to violate Neutrality. Only claims of one's own superiority do that. A: But what Ackerman should say, surely, is: claims of superiority, period. Mustn't he mean that matters of intrinsic superiority and inferiority are not to be mentioned; that Neutral Dialogue doesn't countenance that idea? But let's" @default.
• W2031567691 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031567691 creator A5061552916 @default.
• W2031567691 date "1983-01-01" @default.
• W2031567691 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2031567691 title "Space Talk: The Conversation Continued" @default.
• W2031567691 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/292443" @default.
• W2031567691 hasPublicationYear "1983" @default.
• W2031567691 type Work @default.
• W2031567691 sameAs 2031567691 @default.
• W2031567691 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2031567691 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031567691 hasAuthorship W2031567691A5061552916 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C2778223634 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C2779581858 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C2779755727 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C111472728 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C138885662 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C177264268 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C17744445 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C199360897 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C199539241 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C27206212 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C2777200299 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C2778223634 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C2779581858 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C2779755727 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C41008148 @default.
• W2031567691 hasConceptScore W2031567691C41895202 @default.
• W2031567691 hasLocation W20315676911 @default.
• W2031567691 hasOpenAccess W2031567691 @default.
• W2031567691 hasPrimaryLocation W20315676911 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W1520638178 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W1556683685 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W1991567302 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2023112779 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2024788057 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2042440881 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2146837138 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2254777343 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2319111791 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2327168885 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2331343988 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2333426060 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2504528299 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2597321935 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2729512330 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W2770515772 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W295115921 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W295329526 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W332841224 @default.
• W2031567691 hasRelatedWork W75958700 @default.
• W2031567691 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2031567691 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2031567691 magId "2031567691" @default.
• W2031567691 workType "article" @default.