FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031741036> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031741036 endingPage "74" @default.
• W2031741036 startingPage "56" @default.
• W2031741036 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the central role of communication within teams and jobs satisfaction of the participants in business enterprises. “How communication in the team affects job satisfaction of the team member” shaped the design of the study in developing several propositions. Design/methodology/approach The paper opted for an exploratory study using semi‐structured interviews at two locations, Singapore and Dalian, China. The respondents had taken part in one team, at least, in the past. These respondents were professionals, junior managers, and sales/marketing executives. The data were organized according to the contextual framework developed in the study. The contextual frame was developed by combing attention‐structure with the four phases in a typical team. The concepts and developed constructs were mapped to reach testable propositions. Findings The paper provides an empirical insight on the relationship between formal teams and their members’ job satisfaction. The findings are noted in two stages. First, formal teams, positive attitude to conflicts, effective conflict resolution, and “opinion‐count” of the members positive influence job satisfaction of the member. Second, it appears that “opinion‐count” may have more positive effects than any other concept. Therefore, it is concluded that “opinion‐count” in communication mediates the other effects in team communication for job satisfaction. Research limitations/implications First, the research is based on limited interviews in only two locations, Singapore and Dalian, China; second, the study is a qualitative one. It lacks generalization. Third, it is acknowledged that the author's own interpretation may have influenced the findings ‐‐ it is often unavoidable. Fourth, the number of propositions is limited in the framework. Finally, the participants’ demographic factors are missing from the analysis. For instance, education, age, professional position, technical background, and financial rewards can be included in a future quantitative study. Practical implications It is known that employees’ job satisfaction can lead to better engagement of the employees in the organization. More participation of the employee can be productive for the organization. Since job satisfaction and innovation appear to be highly positively correlated, increasing one can increase the other. Business enterprises lose millions of dollars every year because of the disengagement of their employees. Improving the engagement of employees can improve their productivity. Originality/value Based on inductive methodology, this article links the individual employee's opinion‐count at work place and job satisfaction of the employee. These findings are important in the sense that employees’ engagement at work and well being depends on their satisfaction. Therefore, both the employer and employee can benefit from these findings. The study provides a new solution to an old problem. It suggests that opinion‐count is more effective in increasing job satisfaction than other policies." @default.
• W2031741036 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031741036 creator A5033644568 @default.
• W2031741036 date "2013-02-08" @default.
• W2031741036 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2031741036 title "Positive effects of opinion‐count on job satisfaction of team members in business enterprises" @default.
• W2031741036 cites W1508798800 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W19524887 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W1982632820 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W1994489357 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2005040397 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2021323308 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2025567128 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2038151931 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2044576412 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2052729098 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2055495615 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2060928423 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2066138216 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2075781639 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2081579946 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2087890535 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2100929472 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2118847637 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2120220258 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2121376213 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2124529901 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2128134491 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2128483484 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2147226379 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2156435103 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W2164284962 @default.
• W2031741036 cites W4230154216 @default.
• W2031741036 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311300151" @default.
• W2031741036 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2031741036 type Work @default.
• W2031741036 sameAs 2031741036 @default.
• W2031741036 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362015 @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362016 @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362017 @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362020 @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362022 @default.
• W2031741036 countsByYear W20317410362023 @default.
• W2031741036 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031741036 hasAuthorship W2031741036A5033644568 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C128654540 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C139268390 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C57035238 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C111472728 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C120936955 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C128654540 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C138885662 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C139268390 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C144024400 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C144133560 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C15744967 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C162853370 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C17744445 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C19165224 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C2718322 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C39549134 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C41008148 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C56739046 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C57035238 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C75630572 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C77805123 @default.
• W2031741036 hasConceptScore W2031741036C85973986 @default.
• W2031741036 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2031741036 hasLocation W20317410361 @default.
• W2031741036 hasOpenAccess W2031741036 @default.
• W2031741036 hasPrimaryLocation W20317410361 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W1593772750 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W1986259757 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2057822480 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2080351501 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2080879689 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2164229703 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W305370864 @default.
• W2031741036 hasRelatedWork W4244687816 @default.

• next