FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2031844105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2031844105 endingPage "162" @default.
• W2031844105 startingPage "154" @default.
• W2031844105 abstract "Several types of materials and surgical suture patterns are used in conventional surgery. Their combination with an appropriate knot is the basis for correct tissue apposition and healing. Knot security is essential to prevent loosening or slipping before the suture line is completely closed. Nevertheless, the knot itself is the weakest link in any surgical handling. The aim of this study is to determine and compare the mechanical behavior of four surgical knot types (square knot, surgeon׳s knot, square slipknot and Miller׳s knot) performed with three different suture materials (absorbable monofilament glyconate, non-absorbable monofilament polyamide and absorbable braided polyglycolic acid) in a non-biological experimental in vitro model (a tube of synthetic material with non-linear mechanical behavior). The mechanical properties of each suture material are also compared. Ten samples were mechanically tested for each suture and knot using a uniaxial tensile test until complete sample rupture. The failure Cauchy stress and stretch were calculated. The Cauchy stress at 5%, 10% and 15% strain and standard deviation were compared for each suture and knot type. The results demonstrated that all the suture materials had statistically significant differences in their non-linear mechanical behavior. Absorbable monofilament glyconate was the most compliant suture with the greatest tensile strength, while absorbable braided polyglycolic acid was the stiffest. Regardless of the suture type used, the Miller׳s knot had the greatest failure Cauchy stress and stretch, while the square, surgeon׳s and square slipknot had the lowest. In all cases, the Miller׳s knot was more compliant and had greater tensile strength than the other knots. The square knot, surgeon׳s knot, and square slipknot had statistically significant similarities in their mechanical behavior. Therefore, the Miller׳s knot could be classified as the gold standard and an alternative to the surgical knotting." @default.
• W2031844105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2031844105 creator A5039524199 @default.
• W2031844105 creator A5067490265 @default.
• W2031844105 creator A5076443076 @default.
• W2031844105 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2031844105 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2031844105 title "The Miller׳s knot as an alternative to the surgical knotting? Characterization of the mechanical behavior" @default.
• W2031844105 cites W1594955520 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W1619136845 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W1963971127 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W1975029708 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W1977491110 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2012819876 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2020950253 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2034998195 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2038672848 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2039611308 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2051785349 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2053220483 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2085816405 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2091583882 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2126087005 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2142479957 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W2323445801 @default.
• W2031844105 cites W4245669210 @default.
• W2031844105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.001" @default.
• W2031844105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25058024" @default.
• W2031844105 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2031844105 type Work @default.
• W2031844105 sameAs 2031844105 @default.
• W2031844105 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2031844105 countsByYear W20318441052018 @default.
• W2031844105 countsByYear W20318441052020 @default.
• W2031844105 countsByYear W20318441052022 @default.
• W2031844105 countsByYear W20318441052023 @default.
• W2031844105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2031844105 hasAuthorship W2031844105A5039524199 @default.
• W2031844105 hasAuthorship W2031844105A5067490265 @default.
• W2031844105 hasAuthorship W2031844105A5076443076 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C2779863119 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C2779980959 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C3020183897 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C112950240 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C141071460 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C159985019 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C192562407 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C2777327002 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C2779863119 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C2779980959 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C3020183897 @default.
• W2031844105 hasConceptScore W2031844105C71924100 @default.
• W2031844105 hasFunder F4320323089 @default.
• W2031844105 hasLocation W20318441051 @default.
• W2031844105 hasLocation W20318441052 @default.
• W2031844105 hasOpenAccess W2031844105 @default.
• W2031844105 hasPrimaryLocation W20318441051 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W1613661273 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2009401696 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2051918121 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2052770477 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2057100527 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2333549278 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2402873399 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2407941519 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W2412887287 @default.
• W2031844105 hasRelatedWork W953774232 @default.
• W2031844105 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2031844105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2031844105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2031844105 magId "2031844105" @default.
• W2031844105 workType "article" @default.