FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032170024> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2032170024 endingPage "649" @default.
• W2032170024 startingPage "644" @default.
• W2032170024 abstract "The American Board of Surgery (ABS) intends to assure high standards for knowledge and experience in every graduate from an approved general surgery program. They have gone to great lengths to devise an optimal remediation process for every candidate failing to reach these standards. But what is the effectiveness of the remediation process? ABS data outlined the history and development of the remediation process up to its current form. A core component of this process is a specifically structured additional year of training at selected institutions. Ten institutions, which were classified as outstanding by the ABS, received a standardized confidential questionnaire to collect data that included the institution’s impetus to administer a remedial year (RY), organization of their RY, specific emphasis points, role of advisors, funding, and choice of RY candidates. Each institution was asked to mail a letter to their RY graduates, asking for their participation in a follow-up study aimed at characterizing the failing candidate. ABS data have been available since 1980. Pass rates for the qualifying written examination (QE) improved steadily from about 63% in 1985 to 78% in 2003. Pass rates for the certifying oral examination (CE) have been consistently around 75% since 1985 with improvement to just above 80% within the last 4 years. In 1995, a new ABS policy was announced requiring an additional year of structured training with specific elements. For the QE, the general pool pass rates continued their steady improvement. Although the results for RY candidates did reveal a 20% improved pass rate, they were still 30 percentage points lower when compared with the general pass rates. No improvement was noted in the CE results. In 2003, ABS enacted the latest policy change, which consists of an alternative pathway for QE. The initial experience for 2003 is disappointing. Less than 10 candidates have taken advantage of this alternative, and pass rates have not improved. The policy for CE was changed to allow 5 attempts (up from 3 attempts) in 5 years, and currently it is too early to determine the impact of this change. Nine of 10 institutions agreed to participate in our study. They identified the essential elements of a successful RY. They also emphasized that CE remediation has to go beyond correction of simple knowledge deficits. And they characterized the ideal candidate for remediation. No RY graduates agreed to participate in the planned follow-up study to characterize the failing candidate. The RY process seems to have a valid potential if specific conditions are met. We do believe that differentiation is needed between the QE and the CE remedial year programs. Because the CE incorporates rhetorical skills, an emphasis should be placed on public speaking and presentation skills in a remedial year for the CE. We recommend several possible avenues for consideration: identifying the resident at risk and intervening during residency, incorporating the RY process into the ongoing practice routine of the individual candidate, and actively recruiting participation of candidates in a needs assessment study." @default.
• W2032170024 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2032170024 creator A5021540223 @default.
• W2032170024 creator A5088736867 @default.
• W2032170024 date "2005-11-01" @default.
• W2032170024 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2032170024 title "The Remedial Year in the General Surgery Board Certification Process: How Effective Is It?" @default.
• W2032170024 cites W2043889244 @default.
• W2032170024 cites W2058692542 @default.
• W2032170024 cites W2092145085 @default.
• W2032170024 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2005.02.001" @default.
• W2032170024 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16293502" @default.
• W2032170024 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2032170024 type Work @default.
• W2032170024 sameAs 2032170024 @default.
• W2032170024 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2032170024 countsByYear W20321700242012 @default.
• W2032170024 countsByYear W20321700242016 @default.
• W2032170024 countsByYear W20321700242017 @default.
• W2032170024 countsByYear W20321700242019 @default.
• W2032170024 countsByYear W20321700242021 @default.
• W2032170024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2032170024 hasAuthorship W2032170024A5021540223 @default.
• W2032170024 hasAuthorship W2032170024A5088736867 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C100207952 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C2777106319 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C71745522 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C100207952 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C111919701 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C141071460 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C17744445 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C199539241 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C2777106319 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C38652104 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C41008148 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C46304622 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C509550671 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C71745522 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C71924100 @default.
• W2032170024 hasConceptScore W2032170024C98045186 @default.
• W2032170024 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2032170024 hasLocation W20321700241 @default.
• W2032170024 hasLocation W20321700242 @default.
• W2032170024 hasOpenAccess W2032170024 @default.
• W2032170024 hasPrimaryLocation W20321700241 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W1449284 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W1971653722 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W1989235247 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W2358356424 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W2371113623 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W2561592465 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W3032770112 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W883342016 @default.
• W2032170024 hasRelatedWork W4290323014 @default.
• W2032170024 hasVolume "62" @default.
• W2032170024 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2032170024 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2032170024 magId "2032170024" @default.
• W2032170024 workType "article" @default.