FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032314963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2032314963 endingPage "645.e1" @default.
• W2032314963 startingPage "638" @default.
• W2032314963 abstract "Purpose To determine whether glaucoma subspecialty training, formal risk estimation, or patient age has an impact on physician treatment recommendations in cases of ocular hypertension. Design Experimental study. Methods Members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (118) and American Glaucoma Society (58) were recruited. Each physician was first asked how many young and old patients with ocular hypertension he or she would treat to prevent someone from progressing to glaucoma (number needed to treat). The physicians then reviewed 100 simulated cases of patients with ocular hypertension and reported their likelihood to treat each case. Half of these cases were presented with an estimated risk of conversion to glaucoma within 5 years and half were presented without an estimate. The treatment recommendations were analyzed to determine whether subspecialty status or the presence of a risk calculation had any impact on treatment recommendations. Results Both glaucoma specialists and non-glaucoma specialists were more likely to recommend treatment in cases for which a risk calculation was provided (P = .001). Furthermore, non-glaucoma specialists were more likely to recommend treatment for ocular hypertensive patients than were glaucoma specialists (P < .001). Finally, both groups indicated they were more likely to treat young patients than old. Conclusions Both provision of a risk estimate and lack of glaucoma subspecialty training were associated with physicians being more likely to treat ocular hypertension. These findings have implications with regard to ways in which the treatment of ocular hypertensive patients could be modified and possibly made more consistent with available evidence. To determine whether glaucoma subspecialty training, formal risk estimation, or patient age has an impact on physician treatment recommendations in cases of ocular hypertension. Experimental study. Members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (118) and American Glaucoma Society (58) were recruited. Each physician was first asked how many young and old patients with ocular hypertension he or she would treat to prevent someone from progressing to glaucoma (number needed to treat). The physicians then reviewed 100 simulated cases of patients with ocular hypertension and reported their likelihood to treat each case. Half of these cases were presented with an estimated risk of conversion to glaucoma within 5 years and half were presented without an estimate. The treatment recommendations were analyzed to determine whether subspecialty status or the presence of a risk calculation had any impact on treatment recommendations. Both glaucoma specialists and non-glaucoma specialists were more likely to recommend treatment in cases for which a risk calculation was provided (P = .001). Furthermore, non-glaucoma specialists were more likely to recommend treatment for ocular hypertensive patients than were glaucoma specialists (P < .001). Finally, both groups indicated they were more likely to treat young patients than old. Both provision of a risk estimate and lack of glaucoma subspecialty training were associated with physicians being more likely to treat ocular hypertension. These findings have implications with regard to ways in which the treatment of ocular hypertensive patients could be modified and possibly made more consistent with available evidence." @default.
• W2032314963 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2032314963 creator A5032325357 @default.
• W2032314963 creator A5041973012 @default.
• W2032314963 creator A5042154323 @default.
• W2032314963 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2032314963 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2032314963 title "The Impact of Physician Subspecialty Training, Risk Calculation, and Patient Age on Treatment Recommendations in Ocular Hypertension" @default.
• W2032314963 cites W1964347831 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W1976984512 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W1988680223 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W1993090024 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W1994239478 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2000702318 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2005553483 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2006500266 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2010674719 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2019030153 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2022477602 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2033264701 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2062246954 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2063829909 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2073612827 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2085884907 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2119686812 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2120711134 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2124376741 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2167033697 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W2329930013 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W31739655 @default.
• W2032314963 cites W397522434 @default.
• W2032314963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.032" @default.
• W2032314963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21742305" @default.
• W2032314963 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2032314963 type Work @default.
• W2032314963 sameAs 2032314963 @default.
• W2032314963 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2032314963 countsByYear W20323149632014 @default.
• W2032314963 countsByYear W20323149632017 @default.
• W2032314963 countsByYear W20323149632018 @default.
• W2032314963 countsByYear W20323149632022 @default.
• W2032314963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2032314963 hasAuthorship W2032314963A5032325357 @default.
• W2032314963 hasAuthorship W2032314963A5041973012 @default.
• W2032314963 hasAuthorship W2032314963A5042154323 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C2776521421 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C2781092963 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C118487528 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C2776521421 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C2778527774 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C2780642338 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C2781092963 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C512399662 @default.
• W2032314963 hasConceptScore W2032314963C71924100 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320306811 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320310103 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320332162 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320332177 @default.
• W2032314963 hasFunder F4320337350 @default.
• W2032314963 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2032314963 hasLocation W20323149631 @default.
• W2032314963 hasLocation W20323149632 @default.
• W2032314963 hasOpenAccess W2032314963 @default.
• W2032314963 hasPrimaryLocation W20323149631 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W1945693830 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W1969739287 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W1975088893 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2002544312 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2010738176 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2020609742 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2377183459 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2970161030 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W2998956409 @default.
• W2032314963 hasRelatedWork W3031932723 @default.
• W2032314963 hasVolume "152" @default.
• W2032314963 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2032314963 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2032314963 magId "2032314963" @default.
• W2032314963 workType "article" @default.