FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032510588> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2032510588 endingPage "26" @default.
• W2032510588 startingPage "18" @default.
• W2032510588 abstract "In Brief Objective: Using meta-analytical techniques, the study compared postoperative adverse events and functional outcomes of stapled versus hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following restorative proctocolectomy. Background: The choice of mucosectomy and hand-sewn versus stapled pouch-anal anastomosis has been a subject of debate with no clear consensus as to which method provides better functional results and long-term outcomes. Methods: Comparative studies published between 1988 and 2003, of hand-sewn versus stapled IPAA were included. Endpoints were classified into postoperative complications and functional and physiologic outcomes measured at least 3 months following closure of ileostomy or surgery if no proximal diversion was used, quality of life following surgery, and neoplastic transformation within the anal transition zone. Results: Twenty-one studies, consisting of 4183 patients (2699 hand-sewn and 1484 stapled IPAA) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The incidence of nocturnal seepage and pad usage favored the stapled IPAA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, P < 0.001 and OR = 4.12, P = 0.007, respectively). The frequency of defecation was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.562), nor was the use of antidiarrheal medication (OR = 1.27, P = 0.422). Anorectal physiologic measurements demonstrated a significant reduction in the resting and squeeze pressure in the hand-sewn IPAA group by 13.4 and 14.4 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.018). The stapled IPAA group showed a higher incidence of dysplasia in the anal transition zone that did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.42, P = 0.080). Conclusions: Both techniques had similar early postoperative outcomes; however, stapled IPAA offered improved nocturnal continence, which was reflected in higher anorectal physiologic measurements. A risk of increased incidence of dysplasia in the ATZ may exist in the stapled group that cannot be quantified by this study. We describe a decision algorithm for the choice of IPAA, based on the relative risk of long-term neoplastic transformation. The present meta-analysis compared hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis among 21 studies between 1988 and 2003, comprising 4183 patients. Stapled anastomosis (n = 1484) had significantly improved nocturnal continence with higher anal resting and peak squeeze pressures than those with hand-sewn (n = 2699) anastomosis. The stapled group reported higher incidence of dysplasia in the anal transition zone." @default.
• W2032510588 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5022137060 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5026198545 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5027773961 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5032751131 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5035114294 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5044513022 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5055431287 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5071497199 @default.
• W2032510588 creator A5076036301 @default.
• W2032510588 date "2006-07-01" @default.
• W2032510588 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2032510588 title "A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following Proctocolectomy" @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1965247466 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1966573969 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1967486224 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1968912077 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1969087641 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1972647492 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1977768225 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1979423827 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1982143114 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1988163447 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1994106634 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W1997612705 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2001134890 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2002836463 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2008536818 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2009706064 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2016183176 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2025651303 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2031610329 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2032323415 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2037261446 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2038790305 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2044053804 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2046948168 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2048186278 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2048318184 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2050283903 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2057965062 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2069071759 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2069222383 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2073653997 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2074937337 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2078473009 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2087932641 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2089841557 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2092533301 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2094908063 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2108147146 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2119939282 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2123934455 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2135275635 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2150000105 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2156011201 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2167130223 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2243975268 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2275648668 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2397924597 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2399570323 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2413137404 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2415158352 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2433041708 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W4256467120 @default.
• W2032510588 cites W4360897410 @default.
• W2032510588 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3" @default.
• W2032510588 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1570587" @default.
• W2032510588 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16794385" @default.
• W2032510588 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2032510588 type Work @default.
• W2032510588 sameAs 2032510588 @default.
• W2032510588 citedByCount "320" @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882012 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882013 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882014 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882015 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882016 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882017 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882018 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882019 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882020 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882021 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882022 @default.
• W2032510588 countsByYear W20325105882023 @default.
• W2032510588 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5022137060 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5026198545 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5027773961 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5032751131 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5035114294 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5044513022 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5055431287 @default.
• W2032510588 hasAuthorship W2032510588A5071497199 @default.

• next