FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032557452> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2032557452 endingPage "717" @default.
• W2032557452 startingPage "689" @default.
• W2032557452 abstract "China Men, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, and the Question of Citizenship Brook Thomas (bio) I The middle chapter of Maxine Hong Kingston’s China Men is called “The Laws.” Summarizing legislation and court decisions that have affected those of Chinese descent living in the United States, it further complicates the already difficult task of determining the genre of a book that self-consciously resists pre-set categories. Narrated by a Chinese-American woman who succeeds in simultaneously honoring her male ancestors and challenging their patriarchal customs, China Men celebrates their imaginative and physical efforts to establish and transform a new home despite resistance to their presence. Part autobiography, part retelling and alteration of Chinese and European legends and works of fiction, the book also turns out to be a chronicle of legal history. Not knowing quite what to do with Kingston’s second book, the publishers label it “Nonfiction/Literature.” One blurb on the paperback cover calls it “a history,” while another says that it consists of “myths and stories.” This defiance of easy generic classification is appropriate for a book about a narrator’s effort to understand how people from a country whose name evokes the notion of “center” landed “in a country where [they] are eccentric people.” 1 Kingston’s placement of her chapter on the laws at the formal center of her book should also remind [End Page 689] those in the field of literary studies intent on “political” criticism about the need to pay careful attention to legal history. According to Catherine Gallagher, by turning to the “micro-politics of daily life” such criticism has “displaced or supplemented” traditional “important economic and political agents and events” with “people and phenomena that once seemed wholly insignificant, indeed outside of history: women, criminals, the insane, sexual practices, and discourses, fairs, festivals, plays of all kinds.” 2 Kingston’s bizarre story of an “eccentric” people in the United States might seem a literary example of the sort of criticism that Gallagher advocates, since even though she places “The Laws” in the middle of her book, she makes clear from what surrounds the chapter that a summary of the most traditional of political events cannot possibly give an adequate account of the experience of those of Chinese ancestry in the United States. But if Kingston dramatizes the need to “supplement” traditional economic and political analysis with what one of the book’s blurbs calls “the lode of a culture’s deepest realities,” the central location of “The Laws” suggests that to “displace” such analysis is to risk providing inadequate descriptions of the “micro-politics of daily life.” As Kingston makes clear, laws may not completely determine the shape of people’s lives, but they do affect how they can be fashioned. Citizenship laws are a case in point. Unfortunately, however, when those following “the new direction being taken in American literary studies” turn their attention to questions of citizenship, they rarely pay attention to legal determinations, and when they do they almost always emphasize the law’s power to repress. 3 Kingston also calls attention to a history of legal repression by listing various Chinese exclusion acts. But she lists positive examples as well. In doing so she honors the imaginative efforts of Chinese immigrants who learned quickly how to appropriate the American legal system to their advantage. 4 For instance, under the year 1898 she notes: Another victory. The Supreme Court decision in The United States v. Wong Kim Ark stated that a person born in the United States to Chinese parents is an American. The decision has never been reversed or changed, and it is the law on which most Americans of Chinese ancestry base their citizenship today. (CM 155–56) This essay looks at both this 1898 Supreme Court case and Kingston’s 1980 work of the literary imagination. By bringing legal and literary [End Page 690] analysis together, I offer an understanding of a potential within United States citizenship that we would not get if they were kept apart. I start with Wong Kim Ark and end with China Men, since Kingston’s vision of citizenship is in part dependent upon conditions made possible..." @default.
• W2032557452 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2032557452 creator A5013924893 @default.
• W2032557452 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2032557452 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2032557452 title "China Men, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, and the Question of Citizenship" @default.
• W2032557452 cites W1487184894 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W1591248375 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W160867179 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W1966042355 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W1968475919 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W1993472475 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2011263221 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2021516363 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2049322644 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2056093356 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2070131762 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2110947994 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2140645778 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2165474034 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2313055745 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2340492505 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2464375077 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W258262682 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2796268412 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2797911048 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W2799997130 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W3022900184 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W3108895270 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W393776506 @default.
• W2032557452 cites W580880484 @default.
• W2032557452 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.1998.0046" @default.
• W2032557452 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2032557452 type Work @default.
• W2032557452 sameAs 2032557452 @default.
• W2032557452 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2032557452 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2032557452 hasAuthorship W2032557452A5013924893 @default.
• W2032557452 hasBestOaLocation W20325574522 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C2780781376 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C519517224 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C57473165 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C144024400 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C17744445 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C18903297 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C191935318 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C199539241 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C2777351106 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C2780781376 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C519517224 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C57473165 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C74916050 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C7991579 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C86803240 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C94625758 @default.
• W2032557452 hasConceptScore W2032557452C95457728 @default.
• W2032557452 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2032557452 hasLocation W20325574521 @default.
• W2032557452 hasLocation W20325574522 @default.
• W2032557452 hasOpenAccess W2032557452 @default.
• W2032557452 hasPrimaryLocation W20325574521 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2349360650 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2362215868 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2368219923 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2380329063 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2387202816 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2390391588 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2391832217 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2394206999 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2032557452 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2032557452 hasVolume "50" @default.
• W2032557452 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2032557452 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2032557452 magId "2032557452" @default.
• W2032557452 workType "article" @default.