FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032608706> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2032608706 endingPage "309" @default.
• W2032608706 startingPage "304" @default.
• W2032608706 abstract "The Audacity of Self-Consciousness Gregory Pardlo (bio) When a friend criticized a poem I was drafting by saying I was “trying too hard,” and that the poem felt “self-conscious,” I took her to mean she thought I was making the fact of the poem’s constructedness too apparent, and that my investment—my desire-formaking—should not be so evident. She used the word sprezzatura, and said she wanted the poem to sound more “natural.” This seemed to be a fair critique. After all, I respect her judgment a great deal. So I tried staging the poem to make it appear like something that happened accidentally, while I wasn’t looking. I found myself pretending I was writing absentmindedly. I found myself trying very hard to sound “natural.” I tried humming while I worked. Of course, this made me all the more self-conscious, and I began to question what it was I was pursuing, and whom it was (in terms of readership) this pretense of naturalness was supposed to please. We have inherited catchphrases like “negative capability,” “disinterestedness,” “the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings,” and “the continual extinction of personality,” and for the most part they’ve served us well as guideposts toward an unaffected or “natural” voice. But these terms come out of the fundamentally small-r romantic belief that the voice scrubbed of overt consciousness should be the voice of poetic sincerity. No poet can deny the idiosyncrasies of his voice, but in pursuing this manner of self-effacement, I’m afraid we ignore how we are replacing one performance of the self for another, more authoritative mask. Readers like to know that behind the poem there is someone who cares about the work profoundly, but poets too often emulate a particular tone or voice in order to convince the reader of their care and solemnity. And what is the voice poets tend to adopt? Too often this is a voice that could be attributed to any number of band aid-colored mannequins in a department store window, trading in the most common notions of beauty and prestige. I’m reminded of the vagrancy laws—the so-called “ugly laws” of the last century that allowed people to be jailed for their conspicuous and distasteful appearance. If, for example, someone was unhygienic or foul smelling, or if someone was disabled in a way that called attention to their “misfortune,” under these laws there would be grounds for removing that person from public view. Such laws were in effect until the 1970s in some states. At stake was not merely an aesthetic concern, but the reminder of social inequality and the failure to provide adequate care and support for all citizens. What was (and is) aesthetically acceptable on our streets and boulevards was that which is politely agreeable, well mannered—that which affirms the dominant norm. Taste, a function of preference, is political. Like it or not this principle applies in American poetry. For what is a “natural voice” but one that does not diverge from the familiar in any way that would call attention to the poet’s social, historical, and cultural difference? If we think of the “natural voice” as a tonal frequency unmarked by the effects of injustice or poverty or abuse, for [End Page 304] example; if we think of the “natural voice” as aspiring to a clinically authorized expression of sincerity, it is hard to ignore how that voice must be profoundly constructed and decidedly unnatural—a voice that affirms the authority that resides at the intersection of white and male. I wonder then, if when we criticize a poem for self-consciously calling attention to its maker, that is, if when we ask a poem to sound more “natural,” we are in effect asking the poet to leave the poem at the kitchen door, so to speak, and quietly go away. I wonder if what we are saying is that we like our poems fully assimilated, and if they are not, that they have the decency to perform their difference in socially acceptable ways, cleansed of all reminders of the social and political tensions that conspire to make that poem..." @default.
• W2032608706 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2032608706 creator A5066990001 @default.
• W2032608706 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2032608706 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2032608706 title "The Audacity of Self-Consciousness" @default.
• W2032608706 cites W2035124028 @default.
• W2032608706 cites W2797740084 @default.
• W2032608706 cites W619225517 @default.
• W2032608706 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cal.2014.0039" @default.
• W2032608706 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2032608706 type Work @default.
• W2032608706 sameAs 2032608706 @default.
• W2032608706 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2032608706 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2032608706 hasAuthorship W2032608706A5066990001 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C134537474 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C186720457 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C2776608160 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C2781160333 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C518914266 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C107038049 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C111472728 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C121332964 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C122980154 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C124952713 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C134537474 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C138885662 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C142362112 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C15744967 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C164913051 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C166957645 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C186720457 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C2776608160 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C2781160333 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C518914266 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C62520636 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C77805123 @default.
• W2032608706 hasConceptScore W2032608706C95457728 @default.
• W2032608706 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2032608706 hasLocation W20326087061 @default.
• W2032608706 hasOpenAccess W2032608706 @default.
• W2032608706 hasPrimaryLocation W20326087061 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2350008002 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2358450291 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2385591142 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2387191684 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2388519347 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2470520517 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2730000974 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W3174346504 @default.
• W2032608706 hasRelatedWork W578712397 @default.
• W2032608706 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2032608706 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2032608706 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2032608706 magId "2032608706" @default.
• W2032608706 workType "article" @default.