Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2032852790> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 91 of
91
with 100 items per page.
- W2032852790 endingPage "1680" @default.
- W2032852790 startingPage "1675" @default.
- W2032852790 abstract "This study was designed to identify why the central blood pressure (cSBP) values obtained using the catheter method tend to be higher than brachial systolic blood pressure (bSBP) values obtained using the cuff method.This study enrolled 20 patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) (mean age, 68.9 years; 13 men). Using the catheter method, a pressure guide wire was inserted via the radial artery at the time of CAG to measure the cSBP. The guide wire was then removed and the bSBP was obtained using two methods (the pressure guide wire method and the cuff method). The cSBP obtained with the catheter and the bSBP obtained with the cuff were compared, as were the bSBP obtained with the cuff and the bSBP obtained with the catheter.The cSBP obtained with the catheter was 4.6 mmHg higher than the bSBP obtained with the cuff. The bSBP obtained with the cuff was 8.3 mmHg lower than the bSBP obtained with the catheter. The cSBP obtained with the catheter was 1.7 mmHg lower than the bSBP obtained with the catheter.In elderly patients with evident or suspected coronary heart disease, the finding of a higher cSBP measured using the catheter method than the bSBP obtained using the cuff method is attributable to bSBP underestimation (by 8.3 mmHg) using the cuff method compared to the bSBP directly obtained using the catheter method." @default.
- W2032852790 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2032852790 creator A5014437328 @default.
- W2032852790 creator A5021227934 @default.
- W2032852790 creator A5085714321 @default.
- W2032852790 date "2013-01-01" @default.
- W2032852790 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2032852790 title "Correlation Between the Brachial Blood Pressure Values Obtained Using the Cuff Method and the Central Blood Pressure Values Obtained Invasively" @default.
- W2032852790 cites W1976712582 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W1981286261 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W1985730517 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W1991265000 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2003471009 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2005442313 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2006030331 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2046391810 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2054867909 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2067833505 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2076286718 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2114369401 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2149678655 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2165730407 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2171214492 @default.
- W2032852790 cites W2504267781 @default.
- W2032852790 doi "https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9396" @default.
- W2032852790 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23903498" @default.
- W2032852790 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2032852790 type Work @default.
- W2032852790 sameAs 2032852790 @default.
- W2032852790 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902014 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902015 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902016 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902017 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902018 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902019 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902021 @default.
- W2032852790 countsByYear W20328527902023 @default.
- W2032852790 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2032852790 hasAuthorship W2032852790A5014437328 @default.
- W2032852790 hasAuthorship W2032852790A5021227934 @default.
- W2032852790 hasAuthorship W2032852790A5085714321 @default.
- W2032852790 hasBestOaLocation W20328527901 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C2777604165 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C2778218979 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C3019004856 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C126322002 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C136229726 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C141071460 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C164705383 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C2776820930 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C2777604165 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C2778218979 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C2780017030 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C2781267111 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C3019004856 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C500558357 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C71924100 @default.
- W2032852790 hasConceptScore W2032852790C84393581 @default.
- W2032852790 hasIssue "15" @default.
- W2032852790 hasLocation W20328527901 @default.
- W2032852790 hasLocation W20328527902 @default.
- W2032852790 hasOpenAccess W2032852790 @default.
- W2032852790 hasPrimaryLocation W20328527901 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2032852790 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2067655132 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2077169864 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2078796769 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2151436842 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2312286954 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2363445361 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2418620645 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W2991278255 @default.
- W2032852790 hasRelatedWork W3032419323 @default.
- W2032852790 hasVolume "52" @default.
- W2032852790 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2032852790 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2032852790 magId "2032852790" @default.
- W2032852790 workType "article" @default.