FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2033071449> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2033071449 endingPage "81" @default.
• W2033071449 startingPage "46" @default.
• W2033071449 abstract "The Feminist Quest for Identity: Bntish Imperial Suffragism and Global Sisterhood 1900-19151 Antoinette Burton In the late twentieth century, there are few practitioners of feminist politics who have not been forced to confront the arguments which link feminist attitudes to racist and classist ideologies.2 Indeed, anyone seeking to understand feminisms and their implications for either collective action or sodal theory must acknowledge that, despite the essential role of gendered analyses in the work of sodal, political and cultural transformation , feminist movements do not and cannot condud their theoretical critiques from any kind of privileged vantage point. In fact, it is precisely because of the embeddedness of feminists past and present in their own cultures, national assumptions, and geopolitical formations that women's movements must constantly recognize that they, too, are products of the discrete historical circumstances in which they think, live and work for change.3 Feminisms are, to borrow from Caroline Ramazanoglu, themselves the cultural product(s) of a particular historical period.4 Despite the apparently self-evident nature of this daim, the historical relationship of feminisms to European imperialist ideologies remains largely unexamined by historians of western feminist movements. This is not from want of attention to imperialism's unpad on gender relations either at home or in the colonial arena.5 Nor does it stem from a lack of stated recognition of the fact that early western women's movements were shaped by imperial attitudes.6 In the European context this kind of recognition has chiefly taken the form of short and incisive analyses, such as Mariana Valverde's review of Sheila Jeffrey's The Sexuality Debates or Valerie Amos and Pratibha Parmar's equally important call for a challenge to imperial feminism.7 Such demands and others like them have been answered over the past decade by feminists in a variety of fields who share a deep concern about the ethnocentric pitfalls of feminist scholarship and who have not failed to address, among other things, the problems of exclusion in feminist thought.8 But what passes for consensus about the racist traditions of western European feminisms, at any rate, lacks supporting historical evidence and analysis.9 Critical feminist work in a variety of disdplines points again and again to the need for re-examining early female emandpators and for understanding their relationships with their imperial cultures10 and to the larger European/American imperial enterprises. © 1991 Journal of Women's History, Vol 3 No. 2 (Fall) 1991 Antoinette Burton 47 As Amos and Parmar pointed out in 1984, the movement for female emandpation in Britain was closely linked to theories of radal superiority and Empire.11 Despite their insistence that nineteenth century western feminism was imperial, however, its historically imperial context remains one of the most negleded charaderistics of modern British feminisms . The birth of the women's movement in the late 1850s, with the emergence of women's reform groups, feminist periodicals, and, by 1867, the first women's suffrage petition to the House of Commons, coindded with the unleashing of Palmerstonian imperial confidence and a creeping colonialism which, within two decades, would make greater Britain a full-fledged formal empire.12 As the women's movement won one victory —the opening up of university education, the Married Women's Prop erty Ad—after another, the British government annexed the Punjab, Disraeli bought the Suez canal, and adventurers and financiers scrambled across Africa. Middle-class British feminisms13 and the British empire thus came of age more or less simultaneously. But the late Victorian and Edwardian women's movements share more than just chronological coinddence with empire. As I have suggested elsewhere, middle-class British feminists matured during an imperial age and partidpated in many of the assumptions of the imperial culture in which they lived and in which they sought female emandpation in its wide variety of forms.14 Despite the diversity of feminist programs during the period 1865 to 1915—from education to suffrage to the crusade against prostitution—bourgeois women with different shades of feminist'' commitment shared a self-image of themselves as the rightful dtizens of an imperial nation. Many of them justified women's equality on the grounds that, as..." @default.
• W2033071449 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2033071449 creator A5052384298 @default.
• W2033071449 date "1991-01-01" @default.
• W2033071449 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2033071449 title "The Feminist Quest for Identity: British Imperial Suffragism and Global Sisterhood 1900-1915" @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1488138475 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1511298626 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1516518760 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1525179934 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1543121981 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1606978102 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1966982641 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1968837288 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1973571557 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1976171407 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1976799007 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1983630748 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1987351853 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1993835237 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W1995345066 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2013824291 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2019093947 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2021701608 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2024368093 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2033664310 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2047283045 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2051080924 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2053278115 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2058157834 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2070069013 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2074222663 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2094322701 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2097378995 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2100958086 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2334175157 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2797856371 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W2797983035 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W31663878 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W434742271 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W580580578 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W634641251 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W647805346 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W648667254 @default.
• W2033071449 cites W656596106 @default.
• W2033071449 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2010.0098" @default.
• W2033071449 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W2033071449 type Work @default.
• W2033071449 sameAs 2033071449 @default.
• W2033071449 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2033071449 countsByYear W20330714492012 @default.
• W2033071449 countsByYear W20330714492021 @default.
• W2033071449 countsByYear W20330714492023 @default.
• W2033071449 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2033071449 hasAuthorship W2033071449A5052384298 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C201960208 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C2777688943 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C2779563681 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C531593650 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C63063934 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C107038049 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C107993555 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C138885662 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C144024400 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C158071213 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C166957645 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C17744445 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C19165224 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C199539241 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C201960208 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C2777688943 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C2778355321 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C2779343474 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C2779563681 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C531593650 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C63063934 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C94625758 @default.
• W2033071449 hasConceptScore W2033071449C95457728 @default.
• W2033071449 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2033071449 hasLocation W20330714491 @default.
• W2033071449 hasOpenAccess W2033071449 @default.
• W2033071449 hasPrimaryLocation W20330714491 @default.
• W2033071449 hasRelatedWork W1597265668 @default.
• W2033071449 hasRelatedWork W1946080426 @default.
• W2033071449 hasRelatedWork W2031153046 @default.

• next