FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2033408806> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2033408806 endingPage "478" @default.
• W2033408806 startingPage "474" @default.
• W2033408806 abstract "Nursing and Residential CareVol. 13, No. 10 Clinical ReviewAddressing pain in wound care and dressing removalMaureen BenbowMaureen BenbowSearch for more papers by this authorMaureen BenbowPublished Online:16 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/nrec.2011.13.10.474AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View articleAbstractPain and trauma during dressing removal causes distress and delays healing, which is why it is a priority for health professionals. Maureen Benbow explains how you can help to minimize it. References Andrews EH, Khan TA, and Majid HA (1985) Adhesion to Skin Part 1. Peel tests with hard and soft machines.J Mat Sci 20(10): 3621–3630 Crossref, Google ScholarBenbow M and Iosson G. (2004) A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds. British Journal of Nursing. 13(2): 105–109 Google ScholarCancer Research UK (2011) The skin. http://cancerhelp.cancerresearchuk.org/type/skin-cancer/about/the-skin (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarCoulling S (2005) Nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge of pain after surgery. Nurs Stand 19(34): 41–49 Crossref, Google ScholarDallam L, Smyth C, Jackson BS, Krinsky R, O’Dell C, Rooney J, Badillo C, Amella E, Ferrara L, Freeman K (1995) Pressure ulcer pain: assessment and quantification. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 22(5): 211–218 Google ScholarDavies P and Rippon M (2008) Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care. J Wound Care. 17(11 Suppl): 3–31 Google ScholarEuropean Wound Management Association. (2002) Position Document: Pain at wound dressing changes. Medical Education Partnership Ltd, London Google ScholarHacking R and O’Connor D (2006) Anatomy and physiology of ageing. http://www.frca.co.uk/article.aspx?articleid=100697 (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarHerlihy B and Maebius NK (2000) The Human Body in Health and Illness. 3rd Edn. W B Saunders Company, London Google ScholarHofman D, Ryan TJ, Arnold F, Cherry GW, Lindholm C, Bjellerup M, Glynn C (1997) Pain in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 6(5): 222–224 Link, Google ScholarJoseph D (1997) When healing is a pain. Nursing Times 93(16): 85–86 Google ScholarLangøen A. (2010). Innovations in care of the skin surrounding pressure ulcers. Wounds International. 4:1; http://woundsinternational.com/article.php?articleid=9608&page=1&print (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarMudge E and Orsted H (2010) Wound infection and pain management made easy. http://www.woundsinternational.com/article.php?contentid=123&articleid=8902&page=2&print (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarPhillips PL, Wolcott RD, Fletcher J, Schultz GS (2010). Biofilms made easy. Wounds International, 1:3 http://www.woundsinternational.com/article.php?articleid=8851&page=1 (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarPosnett J and Franks PJ (2007) The costs of skin breakdown and ulceration in the UK. In: Skin Breakdown: the silent epidemic. Smith & Nephew Foundation Hull: 6–12. Google ScholarRippon M, White R, Davies P (2007) Skin adhesives and their role in wound dressings. Wounds UK. 3(4):76–86. http://less-pain.com/documents/evidence/WC-R-014.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarTokumura F, Ohyama K., Fujisawa H, Suzuki M, Nukatsuka H (1999) Time-dependent changes in dermal peeling force of adhesive tapes. Skin Research and Technology. 5(1): 33–36 Google ScholarTurner TD (1979) Hospital usage of absorbent dressings. Pharmaceutical Journal 222: 421–426 Google ScholarWorld Union of Wound Healing Societies. (2004) Principles of best practice. Minimising pain at wound dressing-related procedures. http://www.wuwhs.org/datas/2_1/2/A_consensus_document_-_Minimising_pain_at_wound_dressing_related_procedures.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarWhite RA (2008) Multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings. Wounds UK, 4:1; http://less-pain.com/documents/evidence/WC-W-016.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2011) Google ScholarWinter G (1962) Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 193: 293–294 Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byVascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Treatment of a Complex Abdominal Wound with Vitamin C and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells14 April 2021 | Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Vol. 34, No. 7Nurses’ Education, Confidence, and Competence in Appropriate Dressing ChoiceAdvances in Skin & Wound Care, Vol. 32, No. 10 1 October 2011Volume 13Issue 10ISSN (print): 1465-9301ISSN (online): 2052-2932 Metrics History Published online 16 August 2013 Published in print 1 October 2011 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download" @default.
• W2033408806 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2033408806 creator A5088473008 @default.
• W2033408806 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2033408806 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2033408806 title "Addressing pain in wound care and dressing removal" @default.
• W2033408806 cites W2016672721 @default.
• W2033408806 cites W2076950376 @default.
• W2033408806 cites W2347096514 @default.
• W2033408806 cites W3008382603 @default.
• W2033408806 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/nrec.2011.13.10.474" @default.
• W2033408806 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2033408806 type Work @default.
• W2033408806 sameAs 2033408806 @default.
• W2033408806 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2033408806 countsByYear W20334088062021 @default.
• W2033408806 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2033408806 hasAuthorship W2033408806A5088473008 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C2993807428 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C2993997175 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C3019806175 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C141071460 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C159110408 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C160735492 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C162324750 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C1862650 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C2983098980 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C2993807428 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C2993997175 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C3019806175 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C42219234 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C50522688 @default.
• W2033408806 hasConceptScore W2033408806C71924100 @default.
• W2033408806 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2033408806 hasLocation W20334088061 @default.
• W2033408806 hasOpenAccess W2033408806 @default.
• W2033408806 hasPrimaryLocation W20334088061 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W130910681 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W1577606083 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W1985421715 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W2010340652 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W2113035746 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W2324688651 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W2331423233 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W2966227943 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W3124724260 @default.
• W2033408806 hasRelatedWork W4288047174 @default.
• W2033408806 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2033408806 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2033408806 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2033408806 magId "2033408806" @default.
• W2033408806 workType "article" @default.