SemOpenAlex |

SemOpenAlex

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2033413679> ?p ?o ?g. }

Showing items 1 to 100 of ±105 with 100 items per page.

W2033413679 endingPage "37" @default.
W2033413679 startingPage "32" @default.
W2033413679 abstract "Although obstetricians commonly care for pregnant patients with psychiatric disorders, little has been written about the implications of managing a pregnancy during a prolonged psychiatric hospitalization for severe mental illness. Multidisciplinary care may optimize obstetric and psychiatric outcomes. We describe a severely mentally ill patient at 27 weeks' gestation (G1P0) who was admitted after a suicide attempt. She exhibited intermittently worsening depression and anxiety throughout a 2-month inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, during which her psychiatric and obstetric providers collaborated regarding her care. We review recommendations for antepartum and intrapartum treatment of the acutely suicidal and severely mentally ill patient and, in particular, the evidence that a multidisciplinary coordinated approach to planning can maximize patient physical and mental health and facilitate preparedness for delivery. Although obstetricians commonly care for pregnant patients with psychiatric disorders, little has been written about the implications of managing a pregnancy during a prolonged psychiatric hospitalization for severe mental illness. Multidisciplinary care may optimize obstetric and psychiatric outcomes. We describe a severely mentally ill patient at 27 weeks' gestation (G1P0) who was admitted after a suicide attempt. She exhibited intermittently worsening depression and anxiety throughout a 2-month inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, during which her psychiatric and obstetric providers collaborated regarding her care. We review recommendations for antepartum and intrapartum treatment of the acutely suicidal and severely mentally ill patient and, in particular, the evidence that a multidisciplinary coordinated approach to planning can maximize patient physical and mental health and facilitate preparedness for delivery. Obstetricians regularly care for pregnant women with mental illness; such care largely unfolds without complications. Although major depression affects 3.1-4.9% of women during pregnancy, they rarely require prolonged psychiatric hospitalization.1Gavin N.I. Lohr K.N. Meltzer-Brody S. Gartlehner G. Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 1071-1083Crossref PubMed Scopus (2169) Google Scholar Care for pregnant patients with severe mental illness can be complicated by concerns regarding the appropriate treatment of symptoms relative to risks of exposure during pregnancy. For providers who are not familiar with the treatment of severe mental illness during the perinatal period, this can lead to diversions from obstetric and psychiatric standards of care. To illustrate the issues that arise in such cases, we describe a pregnant woman with longstanding severe mental illness who presented after intentional overdose. We review potential challenges to caring for severely mentally ill women during pregnancy and offer an example of a patient-centered multidisciplinary approach. We will not review psychotropic medication use during pregnancy, which has been addressed in detail elsewhere.2Stewart D.E. Depression during pregnancy.N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 1605-1611Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google ScholarA third-trimester suicide attemptThis married 37-year-old Hispanic woman (G1P0) had a complicated psychiatric history that was significant for recurrent major depressive disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) that resulted in multiple suicide attempts and psychiatric hospitalizations. Before her unplanned pregnancy, she had 4 years of stability on a regimen of paroxetine and lamotrigine. Her medical comorbidities included obesity and likely chronic hypertension. After consultation with her psychiatrist, the patient elected to discontinue her psychotropic medications once pregnancy was diagnosed. She consulted with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) providers at 12 weeks' gestation to discuss medication use, potential implications of pregnancy on her mental illness, and options for pregnancy management. She was counseled that the continuation of psychotropic medications during pregnancy is recommended in cases of severe, recurrent depression. Medication use for pregnant women with such severe mental illness is recommended because of the high risk of relapse with medication discontinuation, with corresponding maternal and fetal risks.3Yonkers K.A. Wisner K.L. Stewart D.E. et al.The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 703-713Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar, 4Cohen L.S. Altshuler L.L. Harlow B.L. et al.Relapse of major depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or discontinue antidepressant treatment.JAMA. 2006; 295: 499-507Crossref PubMed Scopus (746) Google Scholar, 5Viguera A.C. Nonacs R. Cohen L.S. Tondo L. Murray A. Baldessarini R.J. Risk of recurrence of bipolar disorder in pregnant and nonpregnant women after discontinuing lithium maintenance.Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157: 179-184Crossref PubMed Scopus (368) Google Scholar, 6Viguera A.C. Whitfield T. Baldessarini R.J. et al.Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation.Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164: 1817-1824Crossref PubMed Scopus (385) Google Scholar Nevertheless, the patient elected to forego reinitiation of psychiatric medications until 24 weeks of gestation, when she agreed to resume them for worsening symptoms of OCD and depression. In the interim, she had had 2 psychiatric hospitalizations that were triggered, in part, by typical symptoms of pregnancy such as weight gain and fetal movement.At 27 weeks 2 days' gestation, the patient was transferred from a local hospital to our intensive care unit after an intentional overdose. She had been found unconscious by her husband after she had ingested a combination of quetiapine, paroxetine, fluoxetine and clonazepam. Once stabilized, she was transferred to the labor and delivery (L&D) unit for obstetric monitoring. She reported feeling “tired of the pregnancy,” was acutely anxious, worried she was a burden to family, and wondered whether she could care for a baby. On L&D, bedside ultrasound showed an appropriately grown fetus. Initial biophysical profile was 2 of 10, which was suspected to be a transient response to her overdose. Fetal status became reassuring during the period of observation. Because the psychiatry service had determined that the patient lacked the capacity to provide informed consent after the overdose, her husband consented for potential emergency cesarean delivery in the event fetal status had not improved. At this time, she did not have an advanced directive but designated her husband as her medical proxy.Antepartum planningAfter obstetric stabilization, the patient was transferred to the inpatient psychiatric unit where she stayed for the next 2 months. Her obstetric care was transferred from her private obstetrician to the MFM service. Once care was assumed by the MFM service, she had a consistent care team throughout her antepartum admission. Initially, she was treated with a combination of fluoxetine, quetiapine, lorazepam, and haloperidol for acute symptoms of depression and OCD. During the hospitalization, she experienced 2 acute setbacks with suicidal behaviors that necessitated one-to-one supervision for safety. Treatment with electroconvulsive therapy was proposed, but the patient declined. She was then restarted on her prepregnancy regimen of paroxetine and lamotrigine in conjunction with quetiapine. After the change in medications, she improved and transitioned from ambivalence to increased bonding with her fetus and motivation to participate in treatment. During this period of improvement, she reconfirmed her medical proxy. She signed a power of attorney for health care form that formally designated her husband as her primary surrogate decision-maker in the event of her incapacity. She included advanced directives regarding her wishes in the event of need for life-sustaining care.At 31 weeks' gestation, she was diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and started on medical nutritional therapy. The GDM diagnosis was made late because of both the patient's receipt of betamethasone on initial presentation and the initial focus on her psychiatric needs. A hemoglobin A1c test that was performed at the time of her diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test was 5.8%. She had persistent hyperglycemia, despite dietary therapy. Although insulin was the preferred agent, she was started on the oral hypoglycemic medication glyburide because of OCD-related needle intolerance. On this regimen, she achieved adequate glycemic control. The patient was counseled about options for delivery mode and postpartum contraception. At our institution, cesarean delivery on maternal request is not presented typically to women as a preferable choice, but it is considered on an individual basis. This patient expressed her desire for a vaginal delivery and a long-acting reversible contraception method.Multidisciplinary coordination of careA multidisciplinary meeting for collaborative management was organized at 32 weeks' gestation and included members of the MFM, L&D nursing, psychiatry, social work, pediatrics, anesthesiology, hospital administration, and medical ethics teams. Some of these teams initially suggested a planned cesarean delivery might be better for the patient because of her difficulty coping in unpredictable circumstances and her obsessive fear of contamination. Weighing the maternal and fetal benefits of vaginal delivery against the patient's mental illness, the group arrived at the consensus that a trial of labor was preferable in the absence of obstetric indications for cesarean delivery. Because the patient achieved sufficient psychiatric stability to be involved in decisions about her care, her preference for vaginal delivery and subsequent intrauterine contraception carried significant weight. Contingency plans were developed for the management of emergent obstetric events on the psychiatric unit. Induction of labor was planned for 39 weeks' gestation because of her GDM. Although Department of Child and Family Services involvement is not mandatory for all mentally ill patients, this patient's severe mental illness and high risk for self-harm warranted consultation with the Department of Child and Family Services to ensure newborn infant safety. A care plan was developed and distributed.One aspect of the plan involved repeated exposures to typical aspects of L&D. Nonstress tests, which were performed for fetal surveillance because of GDM, increased her comfort with the obstetrics unit and fetal monitoring. She met with anesthesiologists to address her fear of needle contamination; they demonstrated the materials and sterile technique that would be used to provide labor analgesia. The obstetrics team educated her about the evolving pregnancy and labor symptoms.At 33 weeks 2 days' gestation, her blood pressure became mildly elevated, and a 24-hour urine collection revealed 336 mg of protein. Mild preeclampsia was suspected. Because she was psychiatrically stable, she was transferred to the obstetrics antepartum unit with constant psychiatric supervision for safety. At 34 weeks 5 days' gestation, she experienced worsening transaminitis and severe hypertension; repeat urine collection contained 525 mg of protein. A decision was made to proceed with delivery for severe preeclampsia.Key points of the labor plan included (1) a psychiatric nurse to be present in the labor room, (2) an early combined spinal-epidural to minimize pain and avoid pain-induced anxiety, (3) intrapartum telemetry because of Q-T interval prolongation that had recently normalized, (4) premedication with lorazepam before epidural placement to prevent worsening anxiety, (5) parenteral haloperidol (5 mg), lorazepam (2 mg), and benztropine (1 mg) available for acute psychiatric symptoms, and (6) efforts to avoid mechanical restraints (if needed, a left-sided restraint was planned because patients are supine in a 4-point restraint, which could result in inferior vena cava compression by the gravid uterus).Delivery and recoveryAt the time of decision for delivery, the fetus was found to be in a transverse presentation. She consented to an external cephalic version, which was unsuccessful. She subsequently underwent an uncomplicated low transverse cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia that resulted in delivery of a 2645 g male neonate with Apgar scores of 7 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. A ParaGard intrauterine device (IUD; Teva Women's Health Inc, Sellersville, PA) was placed after delivery of the placenta. She tolerated delivery without worsening of psychiatric symptoms and recovered without postoperative complications.During the postpartum period, the patient was seen daily by the psychiatric consult team. She denied any thoughts of harm to herself or her baby and exhibited appropriate behaviors with her son. After a stay in the neonatal intensive care unit for prematurity, her son was discharged to the care of family with a supervision plan that allowed her increasing visitation pending further mental health improvement. Although anxious when informed of the supervision plan, she did not show signs of psychiatric deterioration. This patient had significant familial support; her husband and extended family remained active in her care and were critical in the support of her wellness and autonomy. Close collaboration between psychiatry, MFM, social work, and the patient's family led to a decision on postoperative day 4 to discharge the patient in good condition home with her family with a trial of intensive outpatient psychiatric care. On postoperative day 7, having missed an outpatient follow-up visit, she came to the Emergency Department with worsening depression and suicidal ideation and was hospitalized briefly. After discharge, she complied with her outpatient psychiatric follow-up schedule. When seen for her 6-week postpartum visit, she was gaining confidence in caring for her newborn infant with supervision by the family. At 4 months after delivery, with regular psychiatric treatment, the patient demonstrated improved mental health and had assumed full care of her infant.CommentMental illness can reduce a patient's ability to regulate emotions and adapt to change.7Berking M. Wupperman P. Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012; 25: 128-134Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar This limited ability to adapt to change is of particular concern during the dynamic period of pregnancy; in this example, symptoms worsened when she experienced the onset of fetal movement, an enlarging abdomen, and signs of impending birth. This patient's course may have been substantially different had she continued on her psychotropic medications throughout pregnancy, rather than opting to discontinue them in the first trimester. A crucial component of care for the severely ill pregnant woman includes a discussion of the risk of adverse psychiatric outcomes when medications are discontinued. For patients with such severe mental illness, in addition to medication optimization through collaborative perinatal psychiatric care, a number of steps can be taken to enhance care. Offering anticipatory guidance, safety, and one-on-one teaching via multiple disciplines (psychiatry, nursing, obstetric anesthesia, MFM, and social work) can help patients treat symptoms and participate in their care. Given the importance of entering labor in the healthiest possible mental, physical, and emotional state, we provide several recommendations for achieving this goal.Delivery planningDecision-making regarding the route of delivery is at the crux of delivery planning for severely mentally ill patients. A fundamental goal of obstetric care is to afford patients the least morbid route of delivery for mother and fetus. For women with severe mental illness and possibility of self-harm, an added goal is to maintain patient autonomy and to minimize restrictive measures to the extent their mental health allows. It has been suggested that cesarean delivery is one means by which fear of childbirth can be minimized.8Gregory K.D. Jackson S. Korst L. Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: Whose risks? Whose benefits?.Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29: 7-18Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar Some caregivers have suggested that a mentally ill woman's need for control over timing and route of delivery may justify cesarean delivery. On the other hand, some obstetric providers might argue that vaginal delivery potentially offers increased patient autonomy over a cesarean delivery because of physical restrictions placed on the mother during surgery. Others have reasoned that allowing a choice between cesarean and vaginal delivery is autonomy-enhancing for any woman.9Lyerly A.D. Little M.O. Toward an ethically responsible vaginal birth after cesarean.Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34: 337-344Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar Cesarean delivery on maternal request may be considered in individual circumstances after adequate counseling, although it is not considered a preferable choice at our institution. This is consistent with the general approach to delivery decisions for all women, but it should not imply that no recommendation is given, because providers have an obligation to offer medical recommendations and women may feel abandoned by providers.9Lyerly A.D. Little M.O. Toward an ethically responsible vaginal birth after cesarean.Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34: 337-344Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google ScholarLiterature suggests that mode of delivery is not associated with mental health changes and that worsening mental health is not precipitated by vaginal delivery.10Adams S. Eberhard-Gran M. Sandvik A. Eskild A. Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort of 55,814 women.BJOG. 2012; 119: 298-305Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar There are no data to suggest that worsening mental health is precipitated by cesarean delivery. Additionally, as for women without mental illness, cesarean delivery incurs risks that are greater than with vaginal delivery.8Gregory K.D. Jackson S. Korst L. Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: Whose risks? Whose benefits?.Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29: 7-18Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar Thus, concerns for intra- and postpartum mental health should not influence mode of delivery decisions.10Adams S. Eberhard-Gran M. Sandvik A. Eskild A. Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort of 55,814 women.BJOG. 2012; 119: 298-305Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar, 11Nielsen F.D. Videbech P. Hedegaard M. Dalby Salvig J. Secher N.J. Postpartum depression: identification of women at risk.BJOG. 2000; 107: 1210-1217Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar In our case, despite initial concerns that labor might exacerbate psychiatric symptoms acutely, the team ultimately agreed that cesarean delivery for nonobstetric indications would be a divergence from standard obstetrics practice, particularly in the absence of patient request.Similar to women with schizophrenia, women with other severe mental illnesses may require unique provider efforts to overcome the barriers that are posed by their limited coping ability. Guidelines have been proposed for laboring women with schizophrenia to aid in optimizing their intrapartum course.12Stewart D. Pregnancy and schizophrenia.Can Fam Physician. 1984; 30: 1537-1542PubMed Google Scholar In developing plans for intrapartum care of depressed and anxious women with high potential for recurrent self-harm, we suggest adapting those guidelines as follows:•Provide consistent messaging about the pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum period.•Obstetric and psychiatric providers should work collaboratively to optimize medication regimens. Fetal risks should be weighed against the risk of untreated illness and anticipated maternal psychiatric and obstetric benefits. Psychiatrists with expertise in the use of psychotropic medications during pregnancy (sometimes known as perinatal psychiatrists) should be involved when possible.•Early and adequate pain relief can provide comfort and prevent unnecessary anxiety in a patient whose psychiatric symptoms are triggered by pregnancy-related bodily sensations and pain.•Clarify expectations with the patient, familiarize her with the labor environment, introduce her to the team members and procedures, and explain the feeling of anesthesia to minimize exposures possibly perceived as “new” or “unfamiliar” and prepare her for unfamiliar bodily sensations.•Plan for medications for acute psychiatric symptoms, if necessary, in addition to labor analgesia.•Antenatally, review possible outcomes of the intra- and postpartum periods with the patient and provide her with realistic expectations for recovery.•Before labor, discuss patient preferences for potential intrapartum decisions. Obtain consent if possible. Discuss with the patient and/or her surrogate decision-maker the plans for consent for intrapartum decisions. When possible, the patient should be encouraged to designate formally a health care power of attorney and complete an advanced directive to document her wishes.Further, comprehensive care of the severely mentally ill woman includes planning for the postpartum period, when she is at high risk for psychiatric decompensation.13Munk-Olsen T. Laursen T.M. Mendelson T. Pedersen C.B. Mors O. Mortensen P.R. Risks and predictors of readmission for a mental disorder during the postpartum period.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009; 66: 189-195Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar Our patient transitioned to outpatient care, but many patients with less drastic improvement during pregnancy may require ongoing hospitalization. Planning for postpartum well-being should include consideration of family, cultural, and community resources that may address the severely depressed patient's psychosocial needs.14Clare C.A. Yeh J. Postpartum depression in special populations: a review.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67: 313-323Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar In some communities, mother-infant programs for women with psychiatric disability may enhance the patient's recovery, provide an ongoing source of mental health support, prevent separation of mother and child, and improve her parenting capacity during this fragile postpartum time period.15Buist A. Minto B. Szego K. Samhuel M. Shawyer L. O'Connor L. Mother-baby psychiatric units in Australia: the Victorian experience.Arch Women Ment Health. 2004; 7: 81-87Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar, 16Salmon M. Abel K. Cordingley L. Friedman T. Appleby L. Clinical and parenting skills outcomes following joint mother-baby psychiatric admission.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003; 37: 556-562Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 17Howard M. Battle C.L. Pearlstein T. Rosene-Montella K. A psychiatric mother-baby day hospital for pregnant and postpartum women.Arch Women Ment Health. 2006; 9: 213-218Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar We encourage providers to connect patients with such programs when possible.Autonomy and preventive ethicsIn women with recent acute psychiatric decompensation who have limited decision-making capacity, the obstetric and psychiatric teams must anticipate the possibility of similarly limited capacity during labor. It is important for clinicians to understand the issues of competence and capacity as related to care of the obstetrics patient. Capacity is the ability to participate rationally in medical decision-making; patients may lack the capacity for a variety of possible reasons, including temporary illness.18Leo R.J. Competency and the capacity to make treatment decisions: a primer for primary care physicians.Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 1: 131-141Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Capacity may be determined by the physician and may change with an evolving clinical situation. However, competency is a legal term that refers to the ability to make prudent decisions in one's best interest; a declaration of incompetence effectively denies individual autonomy and requires legal procedures.18Leo R.J. Competency and the capacity to make treatment decisions: a primer for primary care physicians.Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 1: 131-141Crossref PubMed Google Scholar A full discussion of the requirements for competence and capacity, with their legal implications, is beyond the scope of this article and has been published previously.18Leo R.J. Competency and the capacity to make treatment decisions: a primer for primary care physicians.Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 1: 131-141Crossref PubMed Google ScholarPatients with chronic mental illness can exhibit chronic and variably impaired autonomy that can influence medical approaches to obstetric care.19Coverdale J.H. McCullough L.B. Chervenak F.A. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 169-173Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar Nondirective counseling that incorporates patient preferences is advised.19Coverdale J.H. McCullough L.B. Chervenak F.A. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 169-173Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar In this example, obstetric decision-making was guided primarily by patient preference, unless she were to experience a period of impaired decision-making because of psychiatric decompensation. However, we also used a model of preventive ethics that involves clinical strategizing to anticipate and prevent ethical conflict or controversies in the medical decision-making process. We planned for the possibility of impaired decision-making.20McCullough L.B. Coverdale J.H. Chervenak F.A. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 696-702Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar Such a model additionally advises anticipating and minimizing dilemmas regarding intrapartum decision-making by developing plans for precipitous or emergent delivery. Contingency plansshould include both logistical planning (such as equipment readiness on inpatient units other than L&D) and notification systems for obstetric and psychiatric providers in the event of acute issues.The model of preventive ethics additionally includes anticipating intrapartum ethical decision-making for women with severe mental illness by holding advance discussions of patient preferences and provider recommendations.20McCullough L.B. Coverdale J.H. Chervenak F.A. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 696-702Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 21Coverdale J.H. McCullough L.B. Chervenak F.A. Assisted and surrogate decision-making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30: 659-664Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar This process enhances patients' future autonomy by eliciting her values about clinical options, providing education, and negotiating an appropriate treatment plan that is centered around her preferences and clinical needs.21Coverdale J.H. McCullough L.B. Chervenak F.A. Assisted and surrogate decision-making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30: 659-664Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar For this patient, during the antepartum period of stability, we sought her opinions about potential emergency situations and her preferences for delivery mode and postpartum contraception. It is imperative to document in the medical record the patient preferences that are expressed during such a period of lucidity. Typically, patient consent for anesthesia or cesarean delivery would have been sought at the time of such a procedure. However, after consultation with the ethics committee, consensus was that, if the patient were judged to be unable to provide such consent or assent in a time of acute need, her previous statements consenting for such procedures would be deemed an appropriate indication of her wishes. Thus, her preferences that were expressed during a period of psychiatric stability would serve as substitute judgment to guide choices for anesthesia and delivery as warranted by the obstetric situation. This substitute judgment would only be used if the patient lacked the capacity during the moment of need for decision-making or consent. Should she be deemed capable of reasonable medical decision-making, her autonomy would be respected, even if her choices were inconsistent with provider recommendations. Furthermore, this concept of substitute judgment was not intended to supersede the involvement of the patient's surrogate identified decision-maker but was intended to supplement the involvement of her power of attorney to ensure the team was carrying out decisions that were consistent with the patient's expressed preferences.Family planning for mentally ill womenAs with women with any chronic disease, reproductive-aged women with severe mental illness benefit when the potential for pregnancy is addressed by their health care providers, particularly those with perinatal expertise. Additionally, contraception planning is an important component of prenatal and postpartum care. The relative lack of knowledge and low use of co" @default.
W2033413679 created "2016-06-24" @default.
W2033413679 creator A5007960962 @default.
W2033413679 creator A5054096064 @default.
W2033413679 creator A5073956224 @default.
W2033413679 creator A5079827754 @default.
W2033413679 creator A5089582462 @default.
W2033413679 date "2014-01-01" @default.
W2033413679 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
W2033413679 title "Pregnancy in the severely mentally ill patient as an opportunity for global coordination of care" @default.
W2033413679 cites W1971631504 @default.
W2033413679 cites W1972046641 @default.
W2033413679 cites W1988325240 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2009754222 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2010259756 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2035423685 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2036635780 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2040575369 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2042378472 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2043726322 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2047601981 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2052952677 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2054258533 @default.
W2033413679 cites W206324539 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2066961699 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2070573850 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2080603376 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2085270552 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2087521927 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2092454808 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2099302241 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2104302525 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2109651523 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2112599858 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2125086113 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2150371859 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2163114984 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2171348900 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2172102086 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2332695621 @default.
W2033413679 cites W2333811724 @default.
W2033413679 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.029" @default.
W2033413679 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23911382" @default.
W2033413679 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
W2033413679 type Work @default.
W2033413679 sameAs 2033413679 @default.
W2033413679 citedByCount "9" @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792014 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792015 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792016 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792019 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792020 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792021 @default.
W2033413679 countsByYear W20334136792022 @default.
W2033413679 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
W2033413679 hasAuthorship W2033413679A5007960962 @default.
W2033413679 hasAuthorship W2033413679A5054096064 @default.
W2033413679 hasAuthorship W2033413679A5073956224 @default.
W2033413679 hasAuthorship W2033413679A5079827754 @default.
W2033413679 hasAuthorship W2033413679A5089582462 @default.
W2033413679 hasBestOaLocation W20334136791 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C2776674806 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C3019946834 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
W2033413679 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C118552586 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C131872663 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C134362201 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C159110408 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C177713679 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C2776674806 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C2779234561 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C3019946834 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C54355233 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C71924100 @default.
W2033413679 hasConceptScore W2033413679C86803240 @default.
W2033413679 hasIssue "1" @default.
W2033413679 hasLocation W20334136791 @default.
W2033413679 hasLocation W20334136792 @default.
W2033413679 hasOpenAccess W2033413679 @default.
W2033413679 hasPrimaryLocation W20334136791 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2109994796 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2273956082 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2363400180 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2401739700 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2413530964 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2558155956 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2614365095 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W2783428915 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W4250651714 @default.
W2033413679 hasRelatedWork W4252371801 @default.