FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2033420392> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2033420392 endingPage "374" @default.
• W2033420392 startingPage "367" @default.
• W2033420392 abstract "(1) Evaluate hearing results in patients managed with external auditory canal reconstruction; (2) compare results to the expectations from treatment with surgical; placement of an osteo-integrated bone-conduction device (BAHA system); (3) assess complications of both interventions; (4) evaluate the medical cost-effectiveness of each avenue of management at 2005 rates for billings based upon relative value units (RVUs).(1) Retrospective chart review for 36 ears in 29 pediatric patients who underwent surgical canal reconstruction at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital in a major urban center with assessment of management techniques and surgical and audiologic outcomes. (2) Retrospective chart review of six pediatric patients who underwent BAHA placement in a major urban center with assessment of management techniques and surgical and audiologic outcomes. (3) Cost reassessment at 2005 billings rates based upon RVUs for canal reconstruction versus BAHA system and comparative analysis.(1) The average post-operative hearing loss in the right ear was 34.3 dB left ear was 31.6 dB. The average gain per ear was 17.3 dB. (2) Twenty-seven (93%) of EAC reconstruction patients required some form of amplification post-operatively. (3) Data available for three of the BAHA patients reflected the predicted average gain in dB (predicted 34.3 dB, observed 31.8 dB). (4) Early complications of canal reconstruction included removal of the packing by the patient, post-operative bleeding and post-operative hematoma. (5) Late complications included recurrent canal stenosis, recurrent otitis externa, canal prolapse and canal cholesteatoma. (6) Uncomplicated external auditory canal reconstruction cost $51,505.98 or $2909.94/dB of hearing gain based upon billings fro RVUs. (7) Uncomplicated two-staged BAHA system placement cost $42,448.85 or $1237.57/dB of hearing gain based upon billings for RVUs. (8) Uncomplicated single-staged BAHA system placement cost $28,341.00 or $826.27/dB of hearing gain based upon billings for RVUs.Study results indicate that even with significant investments in EAC reconstruction, most patients still required some form of amplification. There are also significant risks of early and late complications from the reconstructive procedure. Studies indicate and our results support that the osteo-integrated bone-conduction device (BAHA system) can achieve truly acceptable hearing (<or=15 dB) in school-aged children with normal bone curves, and it can match the bone-curves for children with sensorineural hearing loss. The two-staged BAHA system placement may be provided at almost one-third the cost to the medical system, on a decibel-for-decibel basis. The single-stage BAHA system placement yields even greater cost savings at just over one-quarter of the cost of surgical EAC reconstruction on a decibel-for-decibel basis. Additionally, there are fewer complications and fewer follow-up visits for the care of the implant system. This is an added value to the parents and patient for the savings in opportunity costs related to the lost time at work and school for office visits and peri-operative care. Overall, it appears that osteo-integrated bone-conduction devices may provide a higher quality of outcome for patients while resulting in significant economic savings." @default.
• W2033420392 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2033420392 creator A5076383785 @default.
• W2033420392 creator A5089407589 @default.
• W2033420392 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W2033420392 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2033420392 title "Canal atresia: “Surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited”" @default.
• W2033420392 cites W1981512769 @default.
• W2033420392 cites W2035208754 @default.
• W2033420392 cites W2443460324 @default.
• W2033420392 cites W4300748232 @default.
• W2033420392 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.003" @default.
• W2033420392 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17196671" @default.
• W2033420392 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2033420392 type Work @default.
• W2033420392 sameAs 2033420392 @default.
• W2033420392 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922012 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922013 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922014 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922015 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922016 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922017 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922018 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922019 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922020 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922021 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922022 @default.
• W2033420392 countsByYear W20334203922023 @default.
• W2033420392 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2033420392 hasAuthorship W2033420392A5076383785 @default.
• W2033420392 hasAuthorship W2033420392A5089407589 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2776603339 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2776689041 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2777085111 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2778841284 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2779812621 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C2780725665 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C126838900 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C141071460 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C167135981 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2776603339 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2776689041 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2777085111 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2778841284 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2779812621 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2780007028 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C2780725665 @default.
• W2033420392 hasConceptScore W2033420392C71924100 @default.
• W2033420392 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2033420392 hasLocation W20334203921 @default.
• W2033420392 hasLocation W20334203922 @default.
• W2033420392 hasOpenAccess W2033420392 @default.
• W2033420392 hasPrimaryLocation W20334203921 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W1975543127 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W1977191320 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2033420392 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2106232266 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2393986060 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2520873898 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2611968595 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2886078307 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W2989611403 @default.
• W2033420392 hasRelatedWork W4321749309 @default.
• W2033420392 hasVolume "71" @default.
• W2033420392 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2033420392 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2033420392 magId "2033420392" @default.
• W2033420392 workType "article" @default.