FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2033562702> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2033562702 endingPage "1151" @default.
• W2033562702 startingPage "1146" @default.
• W2033562702 abstract "Measuring patient-perceived outcomes following orthopaedic procedures have become an important component of clinical research and patient care. General and disease-specific outcomes measures have been developed and applied in orthopaedics to assess the patients' perceived health status. Unfortunately, paper-based, self-administered instruments remain inefficient for collecting data because of: (a) missing data (b) respondent error, and (c) the costs to administer and enter data.To study the comparability of palm-top computer devices and paper-pencil self-administered questionnaires in the collection of health-related quality of life (HRQL) information from patients.The comparability of administering HRQL questionnaires using palm-top computer and traditional paper-based forms was tested in a sample of 96 patients with complaints of hip and/or knee pain. Each patient completed mailed versions of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), and Western Ontario and McMasters University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) three weeks prior to presenting to clinic. At the clinic they were asked to complete the same outcomes measures using the palm-top computer or a paper-and-pencil version.In the analysis, scale distributions, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency and retest reliability of scales were compared across the two data collection methods. Because the baseline characteristics of the groups were not strictly comparable according to age, the data were analyzed for the entire sample and stratified according to age.Few statistically significant differences were found for the means, variances and intra-class correlation coefficients between the methods of administration. While the scale distribution between the two methods was comparable, the internal consistency of the scales was dissimilar.Administration of HRQL questionnaires using portable palm-top computer devices has the potential advantage of decreased cost and convenience. These data lend some support for the comparability of palm-top computers and paper surveys for outcomes measures widely used in the field of orthopaedic surgery. The present study identified the lack of reliability across modes of administration that requires further study in a randomized comparability trial. These mode effects are important for orthopaedic surgeons to appreciate before implementing innovative data-capture technologies in their practices." @default.
• W2033562702 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5014501883 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5014873144 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5016659247 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5025281272 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5035785864 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5051698364 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5063252863 @default.
• W2033562702 creator A5071997990 @default.
• W2033562702 date "2002-11-01" @default.
• W2033562702 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2033562702 title "Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys" @default.
• W2033562702 cites W1862715946 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W1968048691 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W1977767405 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W1987445308 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2015754899 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2021511564 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2045819496 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2051174366 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2058362629 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2067377002 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2110798889 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W2206799008 @default.
• W2033562702 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W2033562702 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00059-1" @default.
• W2033562702 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12472221" @default.
• W2033562702 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2033562702 type Work @default.
• W2033562702 sameAs 2033562702 @default.
• W2033562702 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022012 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022013 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022015 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022016 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022017 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022018 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022019 @default.
• W2033562702 countsByYear W20335627022020 @default.
• W2033562702 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5014501883 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5014873144 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5016659247 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5025281272 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5035785864 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5051698364 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5063252863 @default.
• W2033562702 hasAuthorship W2033562702A5071997990 @default.
• W2033562702 hasBestOaLocation W20335627021 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C191290158 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C197947376 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C105795698 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C114614502 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C129848803 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C133462117 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C142724271 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C17744445 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C185592680 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C1862650 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C191290158 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C197947376 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C198531522 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C199539241 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C204787440 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C2776640315 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C33923547 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C43617362 @default.
• W2033562702 hasConceptScore W2033562702C71924100 @default.
• W2033562702 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2033562702 hasLocation W20335627021 @default.
• W2033562702 hasLocation W20335627022 @default.
• W2033562702 hasOpenAccess W2033562702 @default.
• W2033562702 hasPrimaryLocation W20335627021 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W1990407237 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W2365594754 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W2392405166 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W2575292835 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W2741570494 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W2995453361 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W3001140700 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W3021704418 @default.
• W2033562702 hasRelatedWork W3199583282 @default.

• next