FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034005329> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034005329 endingPage "515" @default.
• W2034005329 startingPage "507" @default.
• W2034005329 abstract "Endovascular intervention can provide an alternative method of treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with visceral artery aneurysms at a single university medical center from 1990 to 2003, focusing on the outcome of endovascular therapy. Sixty-five patients with visceral artery aneurysms were identified: 39 splenic (SAA), 13 renal, seven celiac, three superior mesenteric (SMA), and three hepatic. Eleven patients (16.9%) had symptoms attributable to their aneurysms, which included a total of four ruptures (6.2%): three splenic and one hepatic. Management consisted of 18 (27.7%) endo-vascular interventions, nine (13.9%) open surgical repairs, and 38 (58.5%) observations. Mean aneurysm diameter for patients treated expectantly was significantly less than for those who underwent intervention (p = 0.001). Endovascular interventions included 15 (83.3%) embolizations (11 SAA, three renal, one hepatic) and three (16.7%) stent grafts (two SMA, one renal). The initial technical success rate of the endovascular procedures was 94.4% (17/18). However, there were four patients (22.2%) with major endovascular procedure-related complications: one late recurrence requiring open surgical repair, two large symptomatic splenic infarcts, and one episode of severe pancreatitis. These four patients had distal splenic artery aneurysms at or adjacent to the splenic hilum. There were no endovascular procedure-related deaths. Reasons for performing open surgical repair included three SAA ruptures diagnosed at laparotomy and complex anatomy hot amenable to endovascular intervention (six patients). One surgical patient had a postoperative small bowel obstruction treated nonoperatively; and there was one perioperative death in a patient operated on emergently for rupture. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms is a reasonable alternative to open surgical repair in carefully selected patients. Individual anatomic considerations play an important role in determining the best treatment strategy if intervention is warranted. However, four of 11 (36.4%) patients with distal splenic artery aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization developed major complications. Based on our experience, traditional surgical treatment of SAA with repair or ligation and concomitant splenectomy when necessary may be preferred in these cases. Endovascular intervention can provide an alternative method of treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with visceral artery aneurysms at a single university medical center from 1990 to 2003, focusing on the outcome of endovascular therapy. Sixty-five patients with visceral artery aneurysms were identified: 39 splenic (SAA), 13 renal, seven celiac, three superior mesenteric (SMA), and three hepatic. Eleven patients (16.9%) had symptoms attributable to their aneurysms, which included a total of four ruptures (6.2%): three splenic and one hepatic. Management consisted of 18 (27.7%) endo-vascular interventions, nine (13.9%) open surgical repairs, and 38 (58.5%) observations. Mean aneurysm diameter for patients treated expectantly was significantly less than for those who underwent intervention (p = 0.001). Endovascular interventions included 15 (83.3%) embolizations (11 SAA, three renal, one hepatic) and three (16.7%) stent grafts (two SMA, one renal). The initial technical success rate of the endovascular procedures was 94.4% (17/18). However, there were four patients (22.2%) with major endovascular procedure-related complications: one late recurrence requiring open surgical repair, two large symptomatic splenic infarcts, and one episode of severe pancreatitis. These four patients had distal splenic artery aneurysms at or adjacent to the splenic hilum. There were no endovascular procedure-related deaths. Reasons for performing open surgical repair included three SAA ruptures diagnosed at laparotomy and complex anatomy hot amenable to endovascular intervention (six patients). One surgical patient had a postoperative small bowel obstruction treated nonoperatively; and there was one perioperative death in a patient operated on emergently for rupture. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms is a reasonable alternative to open surgical repair in carefully selected patients. Individual anatomic considerations play an important role in determining the best treatment strategy if intervention is warranted. However, four of 11 (36.4%) patients with distal splenic artery aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization developed major complications. Based on our experience, traditional surgical treatment of SAA with repair or ligation and concomitant splenectomy when necessary may be preferred in these cases." @default.
• W2034005329 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5018483426 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5027509958 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5027646769 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5038520211 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5039266264 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5045649022 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5053643783 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5059029967 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5081185854 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5090960045 @default.
• W2034005329 creator A5091540978 @default.
• W2034005329 date "2005-07-01" @default.
• W2034005329 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2034005329 title "Is Endovascular Therapy the Preferred Treatment for All Visceral Artery Aneurysms?" @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1964396371 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1976447110 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1982265860 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1987172215 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1993963934 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W1998496234 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2001043779 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2016583935 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2038238387 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2040795411 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2049272376 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2052229102 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2068412401 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2071337441 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2072517038 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2078022098 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2088240797 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2092962260 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2105945851 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2107044812 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2110552508 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2162519935 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W2403529177 @default.
• W2034005329 cites W4242835945 @default.
• W2034005329 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-005-4725-3" @default.
• W2034005329 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15986089" @default.
• W2034005329 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2034005329 type Work @default.
• W2034005329 sameAs 2034005329 @default.
• W2034005329 citedByCount "162" @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292012 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292013 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292014 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292015 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292016 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292017 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292018 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292019 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292020 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292021 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292022 @default.
• W2034005329 countsByYear W20340053292023 @default.
• W2034005329 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5018483426 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5027509958 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5027646769 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5038520211 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5039266264 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5045649022 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5053643783 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5059029967 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5081185854 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5090960045 @default.
• W2034005329 hasAuthorship W2034005329A5091540978 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2776634560 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2779819216 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2780333324 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C2781046184 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C3018386432 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C126322002 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C126838900 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C141071460 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2775967933 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2776098176 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2776634560 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2778583881 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2779819216 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2780091579 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2780333324 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2780778865 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C2781046184 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C3018386432 @default.
• W2034005329 hasConceptScore W2034005329C71924100 @default.

• next