FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034006103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034006103 endingPage "80" @default.
• W2034006103 startingPage "53" @default.
• W2034006103 abstract "Little Nothings: The Squire’s Tale and the Ambition of Gadgets Patricia Clare Ingham “The world of the romances,” writes Richard Kieckhefer, “seems at times a vast toy shop stocked with magical delights.”1 Kieckhefer’s popular history of magic in the Middle Ages thus casts the enchanting pull of romances as a fantasy associated with childhood. The toy-shop metaphor may seem odd for the medieval context, however. Following the work of Philippe Ariès, social historians have long surmised that childhood did not properly exist during the Middle Ages, a hard-scrabble time (apparently) little able to afford the trifles of childhood play.2 This assumption has come under important revision in recent years, a move corroborated by the discovery of large numbers of hollow pewter trinkets—many of them obviously children’s toys—found preserved in the riverbed of the Thames. Hollow-cast figurines of knights datable, from their depiction of armor, to c. 1300, presumably for boys; miniature metal tableware and pottery ostensibly for girls; lead-alloy hollow heads—including one that may be a Christ figure, a grotesque, and two that resemble a “caricatured Jewish head” with pointed hat, all of which may have been puppet heads;3 one remarkable hollow-metal miniature [End Page 53] bird or fledgling, originally with moving parts that “enabled the bird to bob and its tongue to go in and out”;4 and significantly, a mold clearly used to produce quantities of toys. On the basis of these findings, Geoff Egan of the British Museum and Hazel Forsyth of the Museum of London hypothesize the mass-production of lead-alloy playthings, “more for a mass market than [as] the privileged treasures of a rich elite.”5 These artifacts suggest not only that childhood existed during the Middle Ages but also that considerable technological skill was dedicated to its entertainments. They also make one wonder why social historians have been so quick to assume a Middle Ages without children or childhood play—an idea that is, relative to the evidence, “virtually baseless,” as Egan puts it.6 On the one hand, these little nothings of medieval social and cultural production, the toys, gadgets, and frivolous entertainments surviving from the period whether in the mud of the Thames or in the pages of medieval romance have been catalogued in the work of such scholars as Kieckhefer, Scott Lightsey, or William Eamon.7 On the other hand, such productions are rarely featured in technological histories, despite the evidence they give of developments in technology. Weberian sociology reserves technological advance for those things associated with production, not leisure, for usable, not “frivolous,” items. Histories of medieval technology stress the innovative power of flying buttresses, windmills, or cannons, yet ignore the drolleries of medieval romance, implicitly viewing them as trivial, not unlike the delicate ceramic glazes or Ming vases fashioned by Asian artists. Max Weber is of course the author of the powerful story of modern disenchantment, positing the historical transformation from a premodern [End Page 54] magical sense of wonder in the world to a modern understanding of the world as accessible to calculation.8 Medieval toys seem disqualified on two counts: not only are they items of play, but they date from the time before widespread technological reckoning. To be sure, there is much to recommend the story of disenchantment, much that resonates with the trackings of culture over the longue durée. Yet Weber’s work cannot help us to assess the productive impulse of this mass market in medieval toys. Criticism of Weber is not new: his earliest Marxist critics, including Christopher Hill and R. H. Tawney, pointed out the errors in his account of Protestantism; more recently Afshin Matin-Asgari, Wolfgang Schluchter, and others have critiqued Weber’s statements about non-Western cultures as predicated on slim knowledge of Islam in its various historical settings.9 In a survey of the field of Islamic Studies, Matin-Asgari points out the ambitious reach of these problems and calls for a rethinking of Weber’s “deeply ethnocentric” fallacy: “defin[ing] societies, or historical eras, primarily in terms of their cultural ‘ethos,’ often articulated in religion,” deserves to be rethought, especially since..." @default.
• W2034006103 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034006103 creator A5018279273 @default.
• W2034006103 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2034006103 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2034006103 title "Little Nothings: The Squire’s Tale and the Ambition of Gadgets" @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1493882943 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1558359436 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1582338476 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1594501748 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1607575401 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W1996705066 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2017017768 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2023631551 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2032970252 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2055165837 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2057874311 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2070371343 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2082509258 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2109532669 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2137271113 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2312578767 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2313210479 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2324846319 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2507992303 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2528350823 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2577942286 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2611968483 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2801491226 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2902443132 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W355888136 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W374474442 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W383621161 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W576059067 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W638284040 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W654671000 @default.
• W2034006103 cites W2512987811 @default.
• W2034006103 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2009.a380141" @default.
• W2034006103 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2034006103 type Work @default.
• W2034006103 sameAs 2034006103 @default.
• W2034006103 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2034006103 countsByYear W20340061032014 @default.
• W2034006103 countsByYear W20340061032015 @default.
• W2034006103 countsByYear W20340061032016 @default.
• W2034006103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034006103 hasAuthorship W2034006103A5018279273 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C143128703 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2777219063 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2777704519 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2779702343 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C2780907072 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C534859617 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C121332964 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C124952713 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C138885662 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C142362112 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C143128703 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C153349607 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C166957645 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C195244886 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C199360897 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2777219063 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2777704519 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2778311575 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2779343474 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2779702343 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C2780907072 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C41008148 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C41895202 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C52119013 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C534859617 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C62520636 @default.
• W2034006103 hasConceptScore W2034006103C95457728 @default.
• W2034006103 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2034006103 hasLocation W20340061031 @default.
• W2034006103 hasOpenAccess W2034006103 @default.
• W2034006103 hasPrimaryLocation W20340061031 @default.
• W2034006103 hasRelatedWork W1993843470 @default.
• W2034006103 hasRelatedWork W2034006103 @default.
• W2034006103 hasRelatedWork W2089351314 @default.
• W2034006103 hasRelatedWork W2273020069 @default.
• W2034006103 hasRelatedWork W2359691639 @default.

• next