FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034009932> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034009932 endingPage "757" @default.
• W2034009932 startingPage "749" @default.
• W2034009932 abstract "Background Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular imaging have been published, but compliance in practice has been incomplete, with persistent high rates of inappropriate use. The aim of this study was to show the efficacy of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative to favorably influence the appropriate use of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a large cardiovascular practice. Methods In this prospective study, a multiphase CQI initiative was implemented, and its impact on ordering patterns for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography and SPECT MPI was assessed. Between November and December 2010, a baseline analysis of the application of appropriate use criteria to indications for outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic studies (n = 203) and SPECT MPI studies (n = 205) was performed, with studies categorized as “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” “uncertain,” or “unclassified.” The CQI initiative was then begun, with (1) clinician education, including didactic lectures and case-based presentations with audience participation; (2) system changes in ordering processes, with redesigned image ordering forms; and (3) peer review and feedback. A follow-up analysis was then performed between June and August 2012, with categorization of indications for transthoracic echocardiographic studies (n = 206) and SPECT MPI studies (n = 206). Results At baseline, 73.9% of echocardiographic studies were categorized as appropriate, 16.7% as inappropriate, 5.9% as uncertain, and 3.4% as unclassified. Similarly, for SPECT MPI studies 71.7% were categorized as appropriate, 18.5% as inappropriate, 7.8% as uncertain, and 1.9% as unclassified. Separate analysis of the two most important categories, appropriate and inappropriate, demonstrated a significant improvement after the CQI initiative, with a 63% reduction in inappropriate echocardiographic studies (18.5% vs 6.9%, P = .0010) and a 46% reduction in inappropriate SPECT MPI studies (20.5% vs 11.1%, P = .010). Conclusions This study demonstrates the effective and persistent positive impact of a CQI initiative to reduce inappropriate ordering of cardiovascular imaging. Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular imaging have been published, but compliance in practice has been incomplete, with persistent high rates of inappropriate use. The aim of this study was to show the efficacy of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative to favorably influence the appropriate use of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a large cardiovascular practice. In this prospective study, a multiphase CQI initiative was implemented, and its impact on ordering patterns for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography and SPECT MPI was assessed. Between November and December 2010, a baseline analysis of the application of appropriate use criteria to indications for outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic studies (n = 203) and SPECT MPI studies (n = 205) was performed, with studies categorized as “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” “uncertain,” or “unclassified.” The CQI initiative was then begun, with (1) clinician education, including didactic lectures and case-based presentations with audience participation; (2) system changes in ordering processes, with redesigned image ordering forms; and (3) peer review and feedback. A follow-up analysis was then performed between June and August 2012, with categorization of indications for transthoracic echocardiographic studies (n = 206) and SPECT MPI studies (n = 206). At baseline, 73.9% of echocardiographic studies were categorized as appropriate, 16.7% as inappropriate, 5.9% as uncertain, and 3.4% as unclassified. Similarly, for SPECT MPI studies 71.7% were categorized as appropriate, 18.5% as inappropriate, 7.8% as uncertain, and 1.9% as unclassified. Separate analysis of the two most important categories, appropriate and inappropriate, demonstrated a significant improvement after the CQI initiative, with a 63% reduction in inappropriate echocardiographic studies (18.5% vs 6.9%, P = .0010) and a 46% reduction in inappropriate SPECT MPI studies (20.5% vs 11.1%, P = .010). This study demonstrates the effective and persistent positive impact of a CQI initiative to reduce inappropriate ordering of cardiovascular imaging." @default.
• W2034009932 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034009932 creator A5023869974 @default.
• W2034009932 creator A5030152416 @default.
• W2034009932 creator A5047367793 @default.
• W2034009932 creator A5072082254 @default.
• W2034009932 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2034009932 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2034009932 title "Improving Appropriate Use of Echocardiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative" @default.
• W2034009932 cites W1964193097 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2006909935 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2022541544 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2038459443 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2039358045 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2051149027 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2076563884 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2096315574 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2201062491 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2484592406 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2616111235 @default.
• W2034009932 cites W2901929978 @default.
• W2034009932 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.03.002" @default.
• W2034009932 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24726335" @default.
• W2034009932 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2034009932 type Work @default.
• W2034009932 sameAs 2034009932 @default.
• W2034009932 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322015 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322016 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322017 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322019 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322020 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322022 @default.
• W2034009932 countsByYear W20340099322023 @default.
• W2034009932 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034009932 hasAuthorship W2034009932A5023869974 @default.
• W2034009932 hasAuthorship W2034009932A5030152416 @default.
• W2034009932 hasAuthorship W2034009932A5047367793 @default.
• W2034009932 hasAuthorship W2034009932A5072082254 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C198783460 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C2777389994 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C2778405248 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C2780441642 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C126322002 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C126838900 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C146957229 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C162324750 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C164705383 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C187736073 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C194828623 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C19527891 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C198783460 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C2777389994 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C2778405248 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C2780441642 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C2989005 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C3020110884 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C71405471 @default.
• W2034009932 hasConceptScore W2034009932C71924100 @default.
• W2034009932 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2034009932 hasLocation W20340099321 @default.
• W2034009932 hasLocation W20340099322 @default.
• W2034009932 hasOpenAccess W2034009932 @default.
• W2034009932 hasPrimaryLocation W20340099321 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W1994831203 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2088576528 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2187875485 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2321182487 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2330427125 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2769604300 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2795319685 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W2886009098 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W3189843545 @default.
• W2034009932 hasRelatedWork W4237148380 @default.
• W2034009932 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2034009932 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034009932 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034009932 magId "2034009932" @default.
• W2034009932 workType "article" @default.