FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034197572> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034197572 abstract "The empirical studies presented by Mossholder, Bennett and Martin (1998) and Chen, Meindl and Hui (1998) are important contributions to our growing awareness of the role of procedural justice in organizations. The Chen et al. (1998) study demonstrates that, although situational factors can determine the distribution of rewards within an organization, they do not override the effects of culture and cultural norms. The Mossholder et al. (1998) study demonstrates that, while the context of procedural justice can explain job satisfaction at the unit level, it cannot account for organizational commitment by individual employees. Together, the papers provide a powerful statement of the way in which law, and legal metaphors, are shaping organizations. From a macro theoretical point of view these empirical studies provide important glimpses into larger social processes which link law, organizations and society. Foremost, perhaps, is the observation that our growing interest in procedural justice within organizations serves as a confirmation, of sorts, of Max Weber's original thesis about the increased rationalization of human experience in modern society and the important role of both law and organizations in that process. A second, but equally important theme represented in these works, is Coleman's (1974) observation about the rising importance of business organizations in society and their displacement of the Church and the State in defining individual identity. Weber suggested that the rational-legal authority system is the dominant institution in modem society. The organization, particularly the bureaucratic organization, best exemplifies this authority because organizations are rational in the sense that they are directed to instrumental goals, and they are legal in their emphasis on formal and explicit rules and procedures. The process of rationalization entails a movement from informal controls based on normative principles of socialization, to formal controls based on explicit rules and regulations. This is the basis of what Sitkin and Bies (1994) have called 'legalistic organization'. A number of macro organization theorists, particularly within institutional theory, have described the diffusion of legalistic organizational practices across North American organizations. Baron, Dobbin and Jennings (1986) provide an account of the spread of formal personnel practices through large U.S. corporations during and after the Second World War. Similarly, Edelman (1990) has demonstrated the expansion of due process in the American workplace. This move toward formal rules and a legal metaphor for thinking about organizations is even reflected in the language used in North American corporations which is becoming increasingly like the 'legalese' we see in contracts and legal opinions (Stutman and Putnam, 1994). Evidence for the increasing legalization of organizational behavior is provided in both empirical studies presented here. The Mossholder et al. (1998) study, in fact, forms a conclusion already familiar to the legal community-that in matters of fairness and equity, justice must" @default.
• W2034197572 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034197572 creator A5079805136 @default.
• W2034197572 date "1998-03-01" @default.
• W2034197572 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2034197572 title "Legalistic organizations: a comment on empirical investigations into procedural justice in organizations" @default.
• W2034197572 cites W1523271407 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2000416441 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2018944729 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2023539364 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2034897320 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2061561935 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2063418967 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W2156843631 @default.
• W2034197572 cites W3123546047 @default.
• W2034197572 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199803)19:2<143::aid-job903>3.0.co;2-0" @default.
• W2034197572 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2034197572 type Work @default.
• W2034197572 sameAs 2034197572 @default.
• W2034197572 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2034197572 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034197572 hasAuthorship W2034197572A5079805136 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C2779149496 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C2779359184 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C52438962 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C83030740 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C9114305 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C111472728 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C120936955 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C138885662 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C139621336 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C144024400 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C151730666 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C17744445 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C190253527 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C199539241 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C26760741 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C2779149496 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C2779343474 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C2779359184 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C39549134 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C51575053 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C52438962 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C83030740 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C86803240 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C9114305 @default.
• W2034197572 hasConceptScore W2034197572C94625758 @default.
• W2034197572 hasLocation W20341975721 @default.
• W2034197572 hasOpenAccess W2034197572 @default.
• W2034197572 hasPrimaryLocation W20341975721 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W1554440580 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W1801306668 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W188357369 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W1997736926 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2023523399 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2067857772 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2136401262 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2163403386 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2167921422 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2231783291 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2492865133 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2800685321 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W290255823 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2940570586 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W3099216967 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W3125799736 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W3125899662 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W3176955213 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W51736642 @default.
• W2034197572 hasRelatedWork W2780046997 @default.
• W2034197572 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034197572 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034197572 magId "2034197572" @default.
• W2034197572 workType "article" @default.