FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034211196> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034211196 endingPage "e510" @default.
• W2034211196 startingPage "e505" @default.
• W2034211196 abstract "Introduction In premolar extraction cases, root parallelism is recommended to preserve the stability of space closures. The influence of the degree of root parallelism on relapse of tooth extraction spaces has been a controversial topic in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the angle between the long axes of the canine and the second premolarin patients with and without stability of extraction-space closures. Methods A sample of 56 patients, treated with 4 premolar extractions, was divided into 2 groups: group 1, consisting of 25 patients with reopening of extraction spaces; and group 2, consisting of 31 patients without reopening of extraction spaces. Panoramic radiographs of each patient were analyzed at the posttreatment and 1-year posttreatment stages. The data were statistically analyzed by using chi-square tests, t tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results The results showed that the groups did not differ regarding the angle between the canine and the second premolar, and there was no correlation between angular changes and reopening of extraction spaces, showing that dental angular changes are not determining factors for relapse, and other factors should be investigated. Conclusions The final angle and the posttreatment changes observed in the angle between the long axes of the canine and the second premolar showed no influence on the relapse of extraction spaces. In premolar extraction cases, root parallelism is recommended to preserve the stability of space closures. The influence of the degree of root parallelism on relapse of tooth extraction spaces has been a controversial topic in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the angle between the long axes of the canine and the second premolarin patients with and without stability of extraction-space closures. A sample of 56 patients, treated with 4 premolar extractions, was divided into 2 groups: group 1, consisting of 25 patients with reopening of extraction spaces; and group 2, consisting of 31 patients without reopening of extraction spaces. Panoramic radiographs of each patient were analyzed at the posttreatment and 1-year posttreatment stages. The data were statistically analyzed by using chi-square tests, t tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation coefficients. The results showed that the groups did not differ regarding the angle between the canine and the second premolar, and there was no correlation between angular changes and reopening of extraction spaces, showing that dental angular changes are not determining factors for relapse, and other factors should be investigated. The final angle and the posttreatment changes observed in the angle between the long axes of the canine and the second premolar showed no influence on the relapse of extraction spaces." @default.
• W2034211196 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5004012588 @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5004065206 @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5017469390 @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5025075978 @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5060954503 @default.
• W2034211196 creator A5080306343 @default.
• W2034211196 date "2011-06-01" @default.
• W2034211196 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2034211196 title "Influence of root parallelism on the stability of extraction-site closures" @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1526378667 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1966746855 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1970653253 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1981278127 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1984052288 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1986148458 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1990139341 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W1994591980 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2001895989 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2011070002 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2035726147 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2061191806 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2063608150 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2066701905 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2071246598 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2072063875 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2088238660 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2091269087 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2093236285 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2095206353 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2100416185 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2119077496 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2130080744 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2142753702 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2162178393 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W2166521042 @default.
• W2034211196 cites W4243633263 @default.
• W2034211196 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.019" @default.
• W2034211196 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21640862" @default.
• W2034211196 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2034211196 type Work @default.
• W2034211196 sameAs 2034211196 @default.
• W2034211196 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962012 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962014 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962016 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962017 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962020 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962021 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962022 @default.
• W2034211196 countsByYear W20342111962023 @default.
• W2034211196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5004012588 @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5004065206 @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5017469390 @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5025075978 @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5060954503 @default.
• W2034211196 hasAuthorship W2034211196A5080306343 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C112972136 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C173608175 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C2781172179 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C4725764 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C112972136 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C117220453 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C119857082 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C173608175 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C185592680 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C199343813 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C202271784 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C2524010 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C2780641865 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C2781172179 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C29694066 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C33923547 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C41008148 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C43617362 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C4725764 @default.
• W2034211196 hasConceptScore W2034211196C71924100 @default.
• W2034211196 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2034211196 hasLocation W20342111961 @default.
• W2034211196 hasLocation W20342111962 @default.
• W2034211196 hasOpenAccess W2034211196 @default.
• W2034211196 hasPrimaryLocation W20342111961 @default.
• W2034211196 hasRelatedWork W1985246353 @default.
• W2034211196 hasRelatedWork W2002593867 @default.

• next