FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034216787> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034216787 endingPage "277" @default.
• W2034216787 startingPage "257" @default.
• W2034216787 abstract "Abstract For two decades, the Central and Eastern European party politics has been characterized by the widespread inability of parties to secure stable political support (reflected in high levels of electoral volatility) to allow their presence in government for consecutive terms. This paper investigates the factors that trigger support for incumbent parties in post-communist countries. In doing so, it examines the effect of individual evaluations at the systemic level (i.e. satisfaction with democracy, government activity), partisan attachment (i.e. preference), and objective indicators of individual economic success (i.e. the level of income) on the vote for incumbents. This cross-national analysis is conducted at the individual-level in six post-communist countries chosen on the basis of the most similar system design. The study uses data from election surveys at two different moments in time (mid-1990s and the first elections of the 2000s) and combines bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. The results indicate that partisanship and positive evaluations of the government explain most of the vote for incumbents. Apart from these visible patterns, there are some other valuable results in specific countries understandable solely within the larger domestic political context. Keywords: incumbentselectoral supportpolitical partiespost-communist countries Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Eric Uslaner, Kenneth Newton, Tom van der Meer, Philipp Reichert, and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their valuable comments, constructive criticism, and suggestions on earlier versions of the article. The author is also grateful to the Netherlands Institute of Government for the support provided in conducting my research and publishing its results. Notes Most of these countries had multi-party competition in the inter-war period. The reason I do not emphasize these categories is that they are more useful at the conceptual level than in empirical terms. There are visible overlaps between them in individual evaluations, one example is provided in the sub-section about satisfaction with democracy. Hungary has only one Chamber and a mixed electoral system that combines proportional representation on lists with single member districts. The question in this case referred to the vote for party lists. The Social-Democratic Party was in government in 1992–1996 and 2000–2004 with different labels: the Party of Social Democracy in Romania (PDSR) and the Social-Democratic Party (PSD) following the merger with the Social-Democratic Party from Romania in 2001. Variables in the models are dummies. I also ran the analysis with the initial coding (i.e. multiple categories or ordinal values) and the results are similar. For the sake of consistency and simplicity, I stick to the use and interpretation of dichotomous variables. Additional informationNotes on contributorsSergiu Gherghina Sergiu Gherghina is PhD Researcher at the Department of Political Science, University of Leiden. His main research interests include party politics in new democracies, legislative behavior, and democratization." @default.
• W2034216787 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034216787 creator A5080488743 @default.
• W2034216787 date "2011-09-01" @default.
• W2034216787 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2034216787 title "Does government performance matter? Electoral support for incumbents in six post-communist countries" @default.
• W2034216787 cites W1502532850 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W178701232 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W1975582252 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W1976631032 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W1988433948 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W1998914991 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2040159308 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2046411627 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2048810856 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2049965034 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2051549045 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2056773410 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2057793388 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2063339706 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2065501634 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2073871843 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2076440205 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2077636920 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2079277662 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2091733320 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2096735723 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2097908050 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2098352118 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2103519322 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2104069788 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2104863076 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2106070533 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2117260126 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2121881827 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2136977554 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2140252845 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2150796138 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2291341743 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2314463799 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2329103711 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2489205538 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2494725678 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2497397816 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2497482216 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W2916246958 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W4230735952 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W4230927399 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W4232065910 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W4300532131 @default.
• W2034216787 cites W4301411233 @default.
• W2034216787 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2011.597144" @default.
• W2034216787 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2034216787 type Work @default.
• W2034216787 sameAs 2034216787 @default.
• W2034216787 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872012 @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872013 @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872015 @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872016 @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872017 @default.
• W2034216787 countsByYear W20342167872018 @default.
• W2034216787 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034216787 hasAuthorship W2034216787A5080488743 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C2778701210 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C542948173 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C111919701 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C138885662 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C138921699 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C151730666 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C162324750 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C17744445 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C199539241 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C2778137410 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C2778701210 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C2779343474 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C41008148 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C41895202 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C542948173 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C555826173 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C7991579 @default.
• W2034216787 hasConceptScore W2034216787C86803240 @default.

• next