FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034267199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034267199 endingPage "741" @default.
• W2034267199 startingPage "736" @default.
• W2034267199 abstract "Malalignment has been frequently reported after intramedullary stabilization of distal tibia fractures. Nails have also been associated with knee pain in several studies. Historically, plate fixation has resulted in increased risks of infection and nonunion. Our purposes were to compare plate and nail stabilization for distal tibia shaft fractures by assessing complications and secondary procedures. We hypothesized that nails would be associated with more malalignment and nonunion.Randomized, prospective study.Level I trauma center.One hundred four skeletally mature patients with extra-articular distal tibia shaft fractures with a mean age of 38 years (range, 18-95 years) and mean Injury Severity Score of 13.5 (range, 9-50). The majority had high-energy injuries.Patients were randomized to a reamed intramedullary nail (n = 56) or a large fragment medial plate (n = 48). Forty fractures (39%) were open. Twenty-eight (27%) had concomitant fibula fractures that were stabilized.Malunion, nonunion, infection, and secondary operations.The two treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to age, gender, Injury Severity Score, fracture pattern, and presence of open fracture. Six patients (5.8%) developed deep infection with equal numbers in the two groups. Eighty-three percent of infections occurred after open fracture (P < 0.001). Four patients (7.1%) developed nonunion after nailing versus two (4.2%) after plating (P = 0.25) with a trend for nonunion in patients who had distal fibula fixation (12% versus 4.1%, P = 0.09). All nonunions occurred after open fracture (P = 0.0007); the primary union rate for closed fractures was 100%. Primary angular malalignment of 5° or greater occurred in 13 patients with nails (23% of all nails) and four with plates (8.3% of all plates; P = 0.02 for plates versus nails). Six additional patients experienced malalignment after immediate weightbearing against medical advice. Valgus was the most common deformity (n = 16). Malunion was more common after open fracture (55%, P = 0.04). Eighty-five percent of patients with malalignment after nailing did not have fibula fixation. Eleven patients underwent 15 secondary procedures after plating, five of which were for prominent implant removal. This was not significantly different from patients treated with nailing: 10 patients had 14 procedures and five for prominent implant removal.High primary union rates were noted after surgical treatment of distal tibia shaft fractures with both nonlocked plates and reamed intramedullary nails. Rates of infection, nonunion, and secondary procedures were similar. Open fractures had higher rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion. Intramedullary nailing was associated with more malalignment versus plating. Fibula fixation may facilitate reduction of the tibia at the time of surgery. The effect of fibula fixation on tibia healing deserves further study. Economic assessment and functional outcomes data for this population will help to enhance our treatment decision-making." @default.
• W2034267199 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034267199 creator A5069861258 @default.
• W2034267199 creator A5070920471 @default.
• W2034267199 creator A5074284663 @default.
• W2034267199 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W2034267199 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2034267199 title "Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Plate versus Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Distal Tibia Shaft Fractures" @default.
• W2034267199 cites W169378885 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W192716767 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W196498463 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1965840127 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1974526785 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1976198521 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1980695354 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1981938470 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1988211810 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W1990284953 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2002285685 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2004776593 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2008446199 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2012094011 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2012789521 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2013486837 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2020497040 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2020692749 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2022509684 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2026775213 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2036927877 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2056682840 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2068722579 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2072427350 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2082088038 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2082387415 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2082447145 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2089046828 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2089560383 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2100246228 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2100792975 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2105763159 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2143366616 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2143865702 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2161938484 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2172276986 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2941084132 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W2947147947 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W4242158314 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W4293108385 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W4378593645 @default.
• W2034267199 cites W6986078 @default.
• W2034267199 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e318213f709" @default.
• W2034267199 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21904230" @default.
• W2034267199 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2034267199 type Work @default.
• W2034267199 sameAs 2034267199 @default.
• W2034267199 citedByCount "242" @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992012 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992013 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992014 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992015 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992016 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992017 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992018 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992019 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992020 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992021 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992022 @default.
• W2034267199 countsByYear W20342671992023 @default.
• W2034267199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034267199 hasAuthorship W2034267199A5069861258 @default.
• W2034267199 hasAuthorship W2034267199A5070920471 @default.
• W2034267199 hasAuthorship W2034267199A5074284663 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C2779779000 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C8337478 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C92162645 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C141071460 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C190385971 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C2777236700 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C2779330695 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C2779779000 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C3017944768 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C71924100 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C8337478 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C85004164 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C92162645 @default.
• W2034267199 hasConceptScore W2034267199C99454951 @default.
• W2034267199 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2034267199 hasLocation W20342671991 @default.
• W2034267199 hasLocation W20342671992 @default.
• W2034267199 hasOpenAccess W2034267199 @default.

• next