FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034290711> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034290711 endingPage "17" @default.
• W2034290711 startingPage "3" @default.
• W2034290711 abstract "Freakery, Cult Films, and the Problem of Ambivalence David Church (bio) Cult Films Acquire a Select but Devoted group of fans who engage in repeated screenings, ritual behaviors, and specific reading strategies. These fans, or cultists, gain subcultural capital by championing their object choices as more unique and supposedly less accessible than mass-marketed cinema. This sense of uniqueness is reflected by the films' perceived difference from mainstream, non-cult movies. Yet, seldom discussed by cult film scholars is the significance of disability in the conceptualization of cult cinema, which I discuss in this article through two intertwined premises. The first premise explores how representations of disability as freakish spectacle, inspired by a long and problematic history of unequal viewing relations, are a common feature in many films taken up as cult objects. In this respect, I focus on cult films that feature performers with visible physical disabilities. These films, such as Tod Browning's Freaks (1932), exemplify the freak show atmosphere that developed around the midnight movie and its cultish kin. My second premise argues that in order to support a subcultural attitude of difference, cult film reception often uses signifiers culturally associated with the stigmatization of disabled bodies. This specifically includes the portioning off of cult films as freakish anomalies, a distinction echoing socially prevalent attitudes that separate abnormal bodies from normal ones. Ableist perceptions of disability as abnormal and deviant thereby form a context for asserting the alleged abnormalcy and deviance of cult films themselves. Cultists may use disability as a metaphor for their perceived sense of rebellion, but this temporary identification does little to challenge the social inequalities still faced by those traditionally linked to freakery: people with disabilities. Although cultists viewing freakery can ritualistically find pleasure in a bodily ambivalence that may potentially serve transgressive purposes in other contexts, said ambivalence facilitates a conservative response to freakery when set within the context of cult reception. The oppositional sense of aesthetic/subcultural difference through which cultists champion their object choices as mainstream cinema's other encourages the reception of abnormality as a socially deviant otherness. Although this binary logic seemingly allows few avenues for escape, a greater cultural awareness of the fluidity and variation within broad categories such as disability and cult may provide a productive alternate view. Freakery and Ambivalence In normative society, freakery is premised on unequal viewing and social relations. A non-disabled audience retains the power to subject a non-normative body (traditionally, that of a person with disabilities) to the ableist gaze as entertaining spectacle, enjoying a mixture of shock, horror, wonder, and pity. Although it has taken many different cultural forms [End Page 3] throughout history, freakery's viewing dynamic is still very much with us in contemporary society, allowing non-normative bodies to remain largely inseparable from the specter of freakery in the popular consciousness. People with disabilities are frequently silenced, placed on display, curiously examined, and subjected to hostile, embarrassed, or pitying reactions from non-disabled people. David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder note that the unequal viewing relations associated with the freak show can thus be considered, in many ways, an exaggerated form of the more subtle, everyday stigmatization endured by people with disabilities (Exploitations). The connotation of spectacular objectification surrounding the term freak emphasizes the body's precedence over all other aspects of the enfreaked individual's identity. This possibly explains why few people with disabilities have attempted to reclaim the term as a label of pride in the same way that the terms crip and cripple (which arguably connote spectacle to a lesser degree) have been reappropriated for political empowerment. Mitchell and Snyder continue, The contemporary disabled body exists by virtue of a visual residue from the freak show past through a contrast that continues to conjure up the freak as potent image in our interpretive reservoir. Our [i.e., disabled people's] humanization is trapped in the necessity of referencing dehumanizing representations of prior histories. (Exploitations) Without a greater social acceptance of disability that could help despectacularize abnormal bodies, freakery thus continues to have potentially harmful consequences for people with disabilities. Disability historians and scholars most often read the freak show as a..." @default.
• W2034290711 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034290711 creator A5068949460 @default.
• W2034290711 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2034290711 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2034290711 title "Freakery, Cult Films, and the Problem of Ambivalence" @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1511154379 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1527052695 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1548283138 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1573317522 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1581070290 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1591983546 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1773808605 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1975019062 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1980654761 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1990053020 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W1993885093 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2005440828 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2033146879 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2067886807 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2312467670 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2935098481 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W2948947538 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W3139649950 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W3204251480 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W362933448 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W567216800 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W586182940 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W595744252 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W604664418 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W610013999 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W621373860 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W625465060 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W629047068 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W653069312 @default.
• W2034290711 cites W103444091 @default.
• W2034290711 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jfv.2011.0003" @default.
• W2034290711 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2034290711 type Work @default.
• W2034290711 sameAs 2034290711 @default.
• W2034290711 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2034290711 countsByYear W20342907112013 @default.
• W2034290711 countsByYear W20342907112014 @default.
• W2034290711 countsByYear W20342907112015 @default.
• W2034290711 countsByYear W20342907112021 @default.
• W2034290711 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034290711 hasAuthorship W2034290711A5068949460 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C2776932993 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C2780493273 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConcept C519580073 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C107038049 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C138885662 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C142362112 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C144024400 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C153349607 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C17744445 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C199539241 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C2776932993 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C2778311575 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C2780493273 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C41895202 @default.
• W2034290711 hasConceptScore W2034290711C519580073 @default.
• W2034290711 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2034290711 hasLocation W20342907111 @default.
• W2034290711 hasOpenAccess W2034290711 @default.
• W2034290711 hasPrimaryLocation W20342907111 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W1513671448 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2064108806 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2488611379 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2562538093 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2564013296 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2625619988 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2950936175 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2990711741 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W2991299042 @default.
• W2034290711 hasRelatedWork W4249215705 @default.
• W2034290711 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2034290711 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034290711 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034290711 magId "2034290711" @default.
• W2034290711 workType "article" @default.